Questions for the Advisory Board

[Berniman]

Yeah, sorry if that wasn't clear.

I just wondered how they would know that she has had meetings with potential buyers.

Again, not that I don't believe it, and I hope it's true they're actively talking to potential buyers of the club.

I think this is being misconstrued as this is happening now/recently..  I am pretty sure this happened last year.  I might be completely wrong and something has happened more recently, but I think this was back in the day when people mentioning people in suits at match days etc.

[horlock07]

I think this is being misconstrued as this is happening now/recently..  I am pretty sure this happened last year.  I might be completely wrong and something has happened more recently, but I think this was back in the day when people mentioning people in suits at match days etc.

I think this is one of the main problems with these cryptic messages going out on SM from SO69 (which still makes me think of a paramilitary organisation when ever I see it written  ) I've no doubt that they are sincere and sourced from somewhere but they are equally easy, in the absence of any primary evidence, to be disregarded (if the reader so wishes) as conjecture and shit stirring.

[Batch]

I think this is being misconstrued as this is happening now/recently..  I am pretty sure this happened last year.  I might be completely wrong and something has happened more recently, but I think this was back in the day when people mentioning people in suits at match days etc.

OH. How disappointing if so. That's not how it read! They probably need to clear that up.

[RobertT]

OH. How disappointing if so. That's not how it read! They probably need to clear that up.

Not necessarily.  Even if it relates to actions a year ago, it paints a picture of a shareholder wanting their money back, or not having any great degree of commitment to keeping those shares.

[TheSpiritof69]

I think this is one of the main problems with these cryptic messages going out on SM from SO69 (which still makes me think of a paramilitary organisation when ever I see it written  ) I've no doubt that they are sincere and sourced from somewhere but they are equally easy, in the absence of any primary evidence, to be disregarded (if the reader so wishes) as conjecture and shit stirring.

Not sure we have a habit of posting cryptic messages...

For clarity: we've been informed that interested parties have previously met with Chris Kiely and/or are required to meet with Chris Kiely during initial interest. Chris Kiely owns 0% of STFC.

[Nemo]

I'm not sure that distinguishing between Chris Kiely and his own wife is really the key point here. Both are listed as persons of significant control on the website (belatedly).

[Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG]

Not sure we have a habit of posting cryptic messages...

For clarity: we've been informed that interested parties have previously met with Chris Kiely and/or are required to meet with Chris Kiely during initial interest. Chris Kiely owns 0% of STFC.

Like within last month? six? year?

[Legends-Lounge]

Yeah, sorry if that wasn't clear.

I just wondered how they would know that she has had meetings with potential buyers.

Again, not that I don't believe it, and I hope it's true they're actively talking to potential buyers of the club.

‘Potential’ buyers, be careful what you wish for. Unless of course it’s our arch wheeler & dealer, insider schmoozing and M&A guru Bathford.

[Legends-Lounge]

Not necessarily.  Even if it relates to actions a year ago, it paints a picture of a shareholder wanting their money back, or not having any great degree of commitment to keeping those shares.

Well as it stands they’re likely to be worth as much as they were twelve months ago as they’ll be in twelve years time the way things stand, unless in the absence of a dividend they’re getting numerated via the ubiquitous ‘administration’ expenditure.

[TheSpiritof69]

Like within last month? six? year?

Year I'd say but can't be sure. Same goes for involvement with footballing decisions I think (manager appointments etc). The mystery man who met Holloway is still a mystery.

[Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG]

Damn. Was hoping for something a bit more recent than that. Still though.....

[Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG]

and on the mystery man, I assumed was Zav.

[tans]

Year I'd say but can't be sure. Same goes for involvement with footballing decisions I think (manager appointments etc). The mystery man who met Holloway is still a mystery.

Zav in his pink y-fronts

[TheSpiritof69]

and on the mystery man, I assumed was Zav.

A sensible guess you'd think.

[tans]

Does he have his own office at the CG? Thats what i heard along the grapevine