Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 58073
|
 |
« Reply #18030 on: Sunday, May 4, 2025, 18:25:40 » |
|
Stop it with your transparency!
@Batch - I presume they are trying to get the actual deal made public that was struck with the Council. I presume the Council have a say in whether that is allowed or not as it likely holds confidential/commercially sensitive information they are not keen on having public.
Maybe so.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG
TOLD YOU SO
Offline
Posts: 8657
|
 |
« Reply #18031 on: Sunday, May 4, 2025, 19:15:50 » |
|
Fair play to Bob though, he's proved if he can't get his mental gymnastics to justify the situation, he'll just make something up.
If all else fails he can log in to the Robinz account and make it look like two of him are arguing the same point.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9757
|
 |
« Reply #18032 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 07:18:24 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Bob1978
|
 |
« Reply #18033 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 07:41:24 » |
|
Fair play to Bob though, he's proved if he can't get his mental gymnastics to justify the situation, he'll just make something up.
If all else fails he can log in to the Robinz account and make it look like two of him are arguing the same point.
Pretty stupid if you can’t have a deciding vote -nothing will ever get done.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob1978
|
 |
« Reply #18035 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 07:49:30 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob1978
|
 |
« Reply #18036 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 07:55:52 » |
|
Is the 384 responses representative of the fan base, representative of the trust, representative of displaced season ticket holders or just unrepresentative?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9757
|
 |
« Reply #18037 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 07:56:19 » |
|
It's representative of those who responded
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Bob1978
|
 |
« Reply #18038 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:04:06 » |
|
It's representative of those who responded
Which is about the same number who protested with SO69 so I will draw my own conclusions.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10219
Git facked
|
 |
« Reply #18039 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:05:33 » |
|
Great work from the Trust, it really does show that the majority of the fan base truly does not support this redevelopment or the current board.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Quagmire
Online
Posts: 4942
Arthur Fouler
|
 |
« Reply #18040 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:07:05 » |
|
Which is about the same number who protested with SO69 so I will draw my own conclusions.
So are you implying that no one else other than those that protested have responded to the Trust? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Audrey
Offline
Posts: 20481
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
 |
« Reply #18041 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:13:18 » |
|
Fuck me, even the Trust can’t spell the name of our best ever player correctly.
It’s ROGERS not RODGERS
FFS
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9757
|
 |
« Reply #18042 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:16:11 » |
|
Which is about the same number who protested with SO69 so I will draw my own conclusions.
It's close to the Hungerford attendances as well! You might be onto something 
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9757
|
 |
« Reply #18043 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:17:41 » |
|
Fuck me, even the Trust can’t spell the name of our best ever player correctly.
It’s ROGERS not RODGERS
FFS
That's 100% on me. No harm intended
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Freddies Ferret 2.0
Offline
Posts: 55
|
 |
« Reply #18044 on: Monday, May 5, 2025, 08:24:02 » |
|
Which is about the same number who protested with SO69 so I will draw my own conclusions.
I would be interested to know what conclusions you would have drawn if the report showed overwhelming favour for redevelopment? I suppose you would view it as fair representation?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|