Batch
Not a Batch
 Offline
Posts: 57701
|
 |
« Reply #18480 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 08:36:59 » |
|
Come on James, you know full well they wouldnt have been able to answer this question
Isnt that the same question stfc_manc asked here  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9734
|
|
« Reply #18481 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 09:18:22 » |
|
Members of the Trust board were on the Official Supporters Club broadcast earlier today. They made a point of declaring their neutrality. They need a minimum of half of all the eligible voters to cast their vote, with 75% voting in favour for a "Yes" vote to pass. The participants explained that they do not want to influence the vote:
to be really helpful, it's 24mins in |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Boydy
Offline
Posts: 264
|
|
« Reply #18482 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 09:27:39 » |
|
I'm not sure I agree with the trust board declaring their neutrality. The trust is about protecting the interests of the fans of the club, as the board should they not be duty bound to state one way or another how the fans interests are best protected?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Online
Posts: 15045
|
|
« Reply #18483 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 09:40:13 » |
|
I'm not sure I agree with the trust board declaring their neutrality. The trust is about protecting the interests of the fans of the club, as the board should they not be duty bound to state one way or another how the fans interests are best protected?
Good point, by definition they can't and shouldn't be neutral. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Quagmire
Offline
Posts: 4903
Arthur Fouler
|
|
« Reply #18484 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 09:53:13 » |
|
Yeah, must say I’m disappointed that they are staying neutral. Expected them to come out and say what they recommend.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57701
|
|
« Reply #18485 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 10:01:18 » |
|
Are they trying not to back themselves into a "being unreasonable" corner with a free and unbiased vote?
I'd hope and think that if they had received extra assurances, proof of funds, etc then they'd share it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Matchworn Shirts
For Sale
Offline
Posts: 7410
|
|
« Reply #18486 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:01:05 » |
|
I still think the plans might get the OK. There are still so many people (despite all that has gone on) who are still taken in by Clementes' jackanory. Add to those who believe the income will actually be spent on the playing staff and it could be a dangerous mix
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG
TOLD YOU SO
Offline
Posts: 8407
|
|
« Reply #18487 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:05:02 » |
|
I'm not sure I agree with the trust board declaring their neutrality. The trust is about protecting the interests of the fans of the club, as the board should they not be duty bound to state one way or another how the fans interests are best protected?
agree |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26701
|
|
« Reply #18488 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:19:02 » |
|
I still think the plans might get the OK. There are still so many people (despite all that has gone on) who are still taken in by Clementes' jackanory. Add to those who believe the income will actually be spent on the playing staff and it could be a dangerous mix
Yep this is my worry also |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57701
|
|
« Reply #18489 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:24:33 » |
|
I still think the plans might get the OK. There are still so many people (despite all that has gone on) who are still taken in by Clementes' jackanory. Add to those who believe the income will actually be spent on the playing staff and it could be a dangerous mix
That's democracy. If it goes through I bloody hope they are right. Sincerely. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Quagmire
Offline
Posts: 4903
Arthur Fouler
|
|
« Reply #18490 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:24:55 » |
|
I see James Phipps has now wrote an open letter and said he will be voting yes.
They’re wheeling them all out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Moss
Offline
Posts: 307
|
|
« Reply #18491 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:28:17 » |
|
I think the Supporters Trust staying neutral on an investment and redevelopment of a stand speaks volumes.
The only conclusion you can draw from them being neutral is that they have concerns?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64552
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #18492 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:34:24 » |
|
I think the Supporters Trust staying neutral on an investment and redevelopment of a stand speaks volumes.
The only conclusion you can draw from them being neutral is that they have concerns?
This 100%. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57701
|
|
« Reply #18493 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:45:55 » |
|
At least his piece set the record straight on the nonsense Mattick came out with.
Your vote is your own is the message I took. But yes, they are wheeling them out.
But nothing has materially changed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Riddick
Offline
Posts: 2891
|
|
« Reply #18494 on: Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 11:47:40 » |
|
I think the Supporters Trust staying neutral on an investment and redevelopment of a stand speaks volumes.
The only conclusion you can draw from them being neutral is that they have concerns?
I suspect they are only stating neutral as their own board cant decide either way, and rather than risk making a decision they can't all get behind (and then have board members sounding off as in the past) that they have chosen to say nothing. Feels kinda weak to me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
