Never heard of it until now considering it looks a big event and only up the road.
https://www.minetyfestival.co.uk/
91
80% / The Nevillew General Discussion Forum / Re: trivial things that make you smile,or make you feel good
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 19:52:50
|
||
Started by Arriba - Last post by Jimmy Quinn | ||
92
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 19:22:03
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Jimmy Quinn | ||
What about the fanzone
![]() |
93
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 19:07:08
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG | ||
The houses are an absolute disgrace and shows the real motivation. The joint venture shouldn't allow it even if redevelopment gets the go ahead.
|
94
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 17:10:29
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Cookie | ||
They should probably also aim for a return on capital above any repayment of capital. Although I'm most curious whether the capital even exists in the first place.
|
95
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 16:47:38
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by RobertT | ||
The odd thing is you don't really need a 6 year ROI - capital financing is usually over 10+ years, so you determine the annual payments (nobody is shelling out the capex out of pocket upfront!) spread over the term of the agreement. That way you know what extra costs you are absorbing, and then build a business case that gives you that amount and more. It's the more bit that then moves the club forward, or if the case can't do that, you don't invest.
|
96
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 16:37:53
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by 4D | ||
I voted no- like many on here i do not have faith in this ownership managing something competently as big as this. Main driver for my no vote though were the funding and business case. As has been said on here we need complete transparency on the source of funding and the terms. Also the business case based on championship football is a pipe dream- no way do they get ROI in 6 years. ROI for a £3M outlay is £10k per week profit, every week for 6 years. No chance. |
97
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 16:13:52
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Crozzer | ||
I voted no- like many on here i do not have faith in this ownership managing something competently as big as this. Main driver for my no vote though were the funding and business case. As has been said on here we need complete transparency on the source of funding and the terms. Also the business case based on championship football is a pipe dream- no way do they get ROI in 6 years. I see it that way. |
98
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 16:09:49
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Jimmy Quinn | ||
And now the adver seems to have got hold of plans for blocks of flats behind the DR stand, the DR statue would surely be the centre piece, I'm sure they will be called Don's flat :>) That would be awful and I can't see it getting planning approval for so few, and Shrivvy road residents would object, what happened to the thoughts of building a hotel into one corner etc With a shortage of properties anything is possible especially if it’s for social housing. |
99
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 16:07:16
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by Outletred | ||
I voted no- like many on here i do not have faith in this ownership managing something competently as big as this.
Main driver for my no vote though were the funding and business case. As has been said on here we need complete transparency on the source of funding and the terms. Also the business case based on championship football is a pipe dream- no way do they get ROI in 6 years. |
100
on: Friday, June 13, 2025, 15:29:39
|
||
Started by Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG - Last post by RobertT | ||