https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd80ApZ8raQ-cExy1pOWYQwr-vgV_JziotbXs8Gcby4xN7IEg/viewform
The trust are pushing this end of season supporter survey. All supporters, not just members.
|
1
on: Today at 17:07:23
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by Nemo | ||
|
2
on: Today at 17:05:02
|
||
| Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by TailBetweenLegs | ||
|
My main concern with this 4D is who are we selling to in this case as Sam Morshead has mentioned that he knows 2 parties who have expressed interest and not even had a response.
|
||
|
3
on: Today at 17:02:50
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by STFC_Manc | ||
|
I really struggle to fathom how the civil case between Power and Standing can have implications on the club bar penalising due to an Agent fund the club. The case is civil and not against STFC. The shares potentially at risk have since been sold. I feel the case is purely Standing trying to recoup funds from Power. It won't have implications for the shares or who owns the club, as it is Power vs Standing and neither have ownership of the club. |
||
|
4
on: Today at 16:32:25
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by tans | ||
|
Surely you just take up the option then negotiate after?
|
||
|
5
on: Today at 16:17:11
|
||
| Started by bigbobjoylove - Last post by fuzzy | ||
|
Dunno if this is right or wrong but, it looks like the EFL are using a Swindon football on one of their on line banners-
https://www.efl.com/news/2024/january/24/efl-schedule-confirmed-for-2024-25-season/ |
||
|
6
on: Today at 16:03:11
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by Bob's Orange | ||
|
I suspect the only options about are the powdered chocolate variety.
|
||
|
7
on: Today at 15:53:19
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by RobertT | ||
|
I really struggle to fathom how the civil case between Power and Standing can have implications on the club bar penalising due to an Agent fund the club. The case is civil and not against STFC. The shares potentially at risk have since been sold. I feel the case is purely Standing trying to recoup funds from Power. Given all deals were initially verbal, any buyer would have a risk alerted to them of that previous handover of ownership possibly creating some messy future civil claims. If Power didn't have the right to sell the other 50%, he didn't have the right to set the price, and while that may be at arms length, it still creates questions. We also cannot know why Standing allowed the sale to occur at the time - he had an injunction that meant he could have blocked it. There could be a side deal hanging around. The bigger issue of course is around the FA charge that remains hovering above us - which is unlikely to be decided until the ownership situation is legally settled. Who buys a business with so many unanswered questions. Not to mention the potential contracts we have signed up to with "friends". Karachi for example - nobody really knows what STFC is on the hook for. It's in, it's out, it's shaking all over the fucking place. |
||
|
8
on: Today at 15:36:35
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by theakston2k | ||
|
I’ve always suspected that the options on the January players were of the type we wouldn’t actually be able to afford. Not technically a lie but never the clubs intention to retain them beyond the end of the season. Unless pre sold of course….
|
||
|
9
on: Today at 15:26:00
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by Bogus Dave | ||
|
Don’t ever, ever, take anything this club says at face value. It’s as simple as that
|
||
|
10
on: Today at 15:20:37
|
||
| Started by Nemo - Last post by Nemo | ||
|
Negotiating on an option? Positively speaking, we might be trying to get him to commit for more than the one year. Other interpretations are, I'm sure, available.
|
||