Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 10
 11 
 on: Today at 13:20:55 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by ChalkyWhiteIsGod
This is the really thorny bit. He's clearly not interested in running the club, and doesn't seem to be interested in disposing of it either. That's the commonality with the fella at Reading, which obviously is a much more advanced situation.

Hopefully coming weeks will make things clearer.

Probably not allowed to if the disorganised crime gang are getting their cut of revenue. They need settling up if he was to sell and probably can't afford to or they simply don't want the scheme to finish.

Especially as people with links to Hart are already being investigated for money laundering in boxing.

 12 
 on: Today at 13:16:53 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by ChalkyWhiteIsGod
Its been widely reported, and Sam Morsehead mentions it in his most recent Ink article, that there have been multiple approaches by other parties interested in the club. Given that is the case, how can Clem liquidating STFC be remotely beneficial for him financially?

What doesn't tally for me is that it certainly seems Clem doesn't have the cash the run the club, the costs are being cut, and that we owe more and more people money, yet he's seemly not interested in selling the club or getting additional investment.



I very much doubt the money put in his his money. Its probably MTK cocaine money being washed who are then getting their strength and conditioning fees back.

Still either way, I doubt he'd want to liquidate and must think he can get a better offer if he's holding out for more.

 13 
 on: Today at 13:14:29 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by ChalkyWhiteIsGod
I would imagine there are clauses they can pull the plug if we dont pay them AGAIN

'Legacy issues' are Clems legacy now.

 14 
 on: Today at 12:51:27 
Started by Crozzer - Last post by tans
Whats this all about?

 15 
 on: Today at 12:47:07 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by Nemo
Well, Philip Green made money out of liquidating BHS.

And who was his solicitor in that deal? Bit too close to home.

Well yes, but he has since won a Trust Hero award.

More pertinently, BHS had some assets to strip!

 16 
 on: Today at 12:45:21 
Started by Crozzer - Last post by Quagmire
Well then he’s daft for handing over a Rolex without receiving the money first.

And it’s still not for a public forum.

 17 
 on: Today at 12:45:05 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by Hyabb17
@mattstfc69 on twitter:

The club is fucked.
Club food for players has been pulled
Travel expenses pulled
Arkells ready to pull the plug
No kit sponsor
No kit manufacturer yet
Security not paid

This is from a former player who works in the club
#STFC

This appears to have been deleted.



 18 
 on: Today at 12:43:58 
Started by Bob's Orange - Last post by ron dodgers
all the debt letters are not everywhere, they are all in the bin

 19 
 on: Today at 12:40:42 
Started by Crozzer - Last post by skiptotheLouMacari
I don’t personally think a players personal financial state, rumour or not, should be posted all over a public forum.
It’s nothing to do with any of us.
It is when he owes a good friend money for a Rolex he won't pay for

 20 
 on: Today at 12:39:21 
Started by Crozzer - Last post by Quagmire
I don’t personally think a players personal financial state, rumour or not, should be posted all over a public forum.
It’s nothing to do with any of us.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 10