Pages: 1 ... 302 303 304 [305]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Squad List (2024/25 Edition)  (Read 807224 times)
iParadise

Offline Offline

Posts: 983





Ignore
« Reply #4560 on: Today at 10:27:27 »

Feel like Harrison is much better than chippenham, but I guess minutes are minutes at the end of the day
Logged
TheSwindonianManSTFC

Offline Offline

Posts: 36


ⵜⵓⴷⴻⵔⵜ ⵥⵉⴷⴻⵏ


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4561 on: Today at 10:39:56 »

It’s frustrating concerning Minturn, dropping two levels and playing against other semi-pro teams and I have the upmost respect for those teams but in pre-season we beat Chippenham 5-1 and there was a marked gap in quality between us and them. What makes it more frustrating is those that we have released e.g. Hubbard are now playing games in the national league and how can’t we get our youngsters moves to those clubs.
Logged

ⴰⴷ ⵏⵔⵓⵃ ⴰⴽⴽ ⴰⴱⵔⵉⴷ- ⵓⵛⵛⴻⵏ ⴰⵃⴻⵔⴼⵉ
theakston2k

Offline Offline

Posts: 5867




Ignore
« Reply #4562 on: Today at 10:40:19 »

Feel like Harrison is much better than chippenham, but I guess minutes are minutes at the end of the day
I’m not sure he is to be honest. A lot of people seem to rate him for his last ditch challenges, but they were usually only necessary because of his poor positioning, which also led to plenty of mistakes. Add in the fact he’s barely played for a year and NLS is probably his level currently.
Logged
Crozzer

Offline Offline

Posts: 2692





Ignore
« Reply #4563 on: Today at 10:45:17 »

Ah ok cheers! My guess is Holloway already has someone lined up if that's the case but Delaney needs moving on first budget wise.

He's a bit wacky at times but fair enough the gaffer knows what he wants.



From what I can see, Delaney lacks the pace for the Town to maintain a high line, resulting in the Town being less compact.  Delaney's long diagonal passing is impressive as well as is ability to win  headers.  I suspect playing off the bench is not where he or the club want to be.  
Logged
Quagmire

Online Online

Posts: 4940


Arthur Fouler




Ignore
« Reply #4564 on: Today at 10:47:11 »

I think sometimes we overhype players because they are ‘one of our own’

I have always felt like this is the case with Minturn, never been his biggest fan and would say NLS is probably his level. There’s a reason we couldn’t get him a loan any higher.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 58072





Ignore
« Reply #4565 on: Today at 10:52:19 »

After his goal against Cardiff, a League One loan in January or recall for Princewill is only to be expected.  Surprised he is playing at this level TBH.

I guess it usually goes one of two ways:
 - Too good - scores loads and leaves in Jan
 - Rubbish. Never scores. Stays.

I suppose losing him in January would be a success.

=========
Re: Minturn. Don't think he's developed enough to be able to tell if he's good enough. The injuries have robbed him of the opportunity.

Staying local with Chippers may be two steps back to take three forwards later. Time will indeed tell.
Logged
Jimmy Quinn

Offline Offline

Posts: 16875


If in doubt fuck them all




Ignore
« Reply #4566 on: Today at 10:53:01 »

I also think Hodgetts and BBC Wilts over hype how strong out bench is even when we’ve been shite over recent seasons.
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 34001


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #4567 on: Today at 10:53:26 »

I think sometimes we overhype players because they are ‘one of our own’

I have always felt like this is the case with Minturn, never been his biggest fan and would say NLS is probably his level. There’s a reason we couldn’t get him a loan any higher.

I see what you’re saying but I don’t think anyone really rated Twine either. He hadn’t really shown anything for us outside of a good pre-season.

A decent game filled loan one step down made him.

It’s what Minturn has needed for about 3 years now. If he can’t get it now it’s probably too late…
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 34001


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #4568 on: Today at 10:55:56 »

Also, it’s a sad indictment of football that after our season long loan player has scored ONE goal there is already talk of him being recalled in January.

1. That’s not a season long loan then is it?
2. Is that all it takes to move up a level now as a striker. One goal?
Logged
Crozzer

Offline Offline

Posts: 2692





Ignore
« Reply #4569 on: Today at 11:10:34 »

It was reported that Princewill was a loan target for several League One clubs before signing for the Town.  His brother scored a similar goal for Reading this week in the same competition.  I would conjecture that location had a lot to do with his signing.  I would hazard a guess that after January having played with the physicality of League Two, he would be ready for Southampton's bench in the Championship.  If not, he would be ready for League One starting as a further loan.  I think that Sam is being no more than realistic.  

Yes, in this instance, one goal and a near miss showed he has the ability to run straight through the middle of a League One defence beating them with ball control and pace. I expect the lights are already burning late into the night at League Two clubs trying to find a way to stop him. As Holloway stated, he was surprised he was able to sign him.  It was the nature of the goal against a decent defence that was so shocking in a good way.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:19:19 by Crozzer » Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 23759





Ignore
« Reply #4570 on: Today at 11:17:43 »

Of course it's realistic, and it's literally what we're hoping happens with all our loans out, just an amusing sign of where football is now that one goal in we're talking about moving up a level.
Logged
Jimmy Quinn

Offline Offline

Posts: 16875


If in doubt fuck them all




Ignore
« Reply #4571 on: Today at 11:19:42 »

And something Holloway had previously said he wasn’t keen on.
Logged
Crozzer

Offline Offline

Posts: 2692





Ignore
« Reply #4572 on: Today at 11:25:50 »


Staying local with Chippers may be two steps back to take three forwards later. Time will indeed tell.

I like the paraphrased Marxist - Leninist reference, who knew that this forum could be so Araldite.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:31:43 by Crozzer » Logged
Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 20479


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #4573 on: Today at 12:35:44 »

Holloway pointed out how Walsall fell away after their loan striker was recalled last January and has now done the exact same thing with the exact same risk.

Anyway, if it gets us away from hoofing to Harry I’m all for it.
Logged
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Online Online

Posts: 15228



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4574 on: Today at 14:32:54 »

Also, it’s a sad indictment of football that after our season long loan player has scored ONE goal there is already talk of him being recalled in January.

1. That’s not a season long loan then is it?
2. Is that all it takes to move up a level now as a striker. One goal?
Indeed it is not. The 'season long loan' is a myth which was vividly illustrated in the Garner season when we lost KKH, Crichlow and Simpson half way through the season when they had all become mainstays of the first team.

The parent club should of course be able to retain control of the player and have the right to recall them if they see fit but not to loan them out to another club at a higher level, that doesn't seem fair when a 'season long loan' is what has been agreed. Alternatively, just cut the BS and start calling it what it is...a 4 month loan.

It must be relatively rare for season long loans to actually last a full season i.e. the player is good enough for the loanee's club to want to retain the player and for the parent club to not want him back, Joel Cotterill being a notable example.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 302 303 304 [305]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: