Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
 Offline
Posts: 16347
|
 |
« Reply #855 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 16:44:33 » |
|
I think we’ve signed decent defenders, but I don’t see any title challenging sides being too bothered about any of the midfield or attacking signings. They’ve been….fine….by and large, but I haven’t seen anything from any of them yet (bar wakeling) which would suggest they can develop to play at a higher level. Appreciate it’s early to come to that conclusion
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19341
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #856 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 17:38:06 » |
|
Plymouth have said they have no intention of recalling Jephcott in January.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 55289
|
|
« Reply #857 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 18:10:18 » |
|
Plymouth have said they have no intention of recalling Jephcott in January. recently? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59261
Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.
|
|
« Reply #858 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 18:12:23 » |
|
recently?
From Pasoti today To have our 3 strikers on 29 goals between them before Christmas is an incredible effort.
I'm sure we've had seasons when the entire team have scored fewer!
Steven Schumacher has indicated that Luke Jephcott and Ryan Law will not be recalled from their loan spells at Swindon Town and Gillingham. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
I JBZelieve We Will Win
JBZ reborn
Offline
Posts: 88
|
|
« Reply #859 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 19:43:53 » |
|
I don't think that Jephcott would add anything to Plymouth's current squad. They are playing at a higher level and are succeeding with what they have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 55289
|
|
« Reply #860 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 19:51:39 » |
|
thanks Venks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15141
|
|
« Reply #861 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 20:11:26 » |
|
He's 23 next month so needs to settle at a club and establish himself.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
So, give no fucks
|
|
|
|
DMC
|
|
« Reply #862 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 22:02:15 » |
|
A forward line of Wakeling Jephcott and Austin excites me but be nice to have a Louis Barry/McKirdy type player to play off the main striker.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aroundthefur
Offline
Posts: 319
|
|
« Reply #863 on: Friday, December 23, 2022, 23:47:23 » |
|
How would Wakeling Jephcott and Austin fit into a starting XI? Or would your ideal XI see two of those three starting together (Jephcott and Austin?) with an impact player off the bench (Wakeling?).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #864 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 08:15:23 » |
|
A forward line of Wakeling Jephcott and Austin excites me but be nice to have a Louis Barry/McKirdy type player to play off the main striker.
3 exciting strikers for sure. Exciting as a front three? Not so sure. Whilst they are all different types of players they are (imo anyway) all central strikers, so at best you could only play two of them at a time. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19341
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #865 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 08:48:16 » |
|
And going by Lavinier’s performance at Barrow, how do we fit him and Hutton in the same starting XI?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #866 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 09:03:47 » |
|
And going by Lavinier’s performance at Barrow, how do we fit him and Hutton in the same starting XI?
4231 with one at right back and one wide right of the three. So, for arguments sake (all fit and what not) Brynn Lavinier MacDonald Clayton FBT Reed Khan Hutton Gladwin Williams Jephcott …and that still leaves Wakeling, Darcy, Shade, Roberts & Iandolo who could slot into a variety of those midfield/attacking midfield positions… |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15141
|
|
« Reply #867 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 09:05:29 » |
|
Ref - to what Div has said 3 into 2 won't go and behind the scenes with the Austin speculation gathering pace is that what Lindsey alluded to in his interview when asked about Jephcott when he said there is lots to sort out. Maybe Jephcott wants to know where he would fit before committing to Swindon permanently.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
So, give no fucks
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 55289
|
|
« Reply #868 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 09:52:14 » |
|
or maybe he simply he wants too much money
or maybe the deal wasn't as agreed as reported
or maybe he's not enjoying it....
well only one when we get told. But was the loan until January or season long. could we keep him and sort it out in June?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19341
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #869 on: Saturday, December 24, 2022, 11:16:27 » |
|
Well, seeing as Plymouth have said they won’t be recalling him in January, the original loan must be a season-long one. As to whether there is an agreement in place to sign him on a perm in January, it’s difficult to know who’s telling the truth.
Is it a done deal with fee included that is set in stone? Is it just some verbal agreement that either club could wheedle out of if they wanted to? Does Jephcott have any say.
All will soon be revealed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
