BenTheRed
 Offline
Posts: 206
|
 |
« Reply #18540 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 15:53:42 » |
|
Voted no
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
No Longer Posh Red
Not Posh any more!
Offline
Posts: 8216
|
|
« Reply #18541 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 15:56:30 » |
|
Voting opens at 5pm Trust members.
Despite my deep concerns for the contents of Dick Mattick's garage, I think it's going to be a no. As others have said I've no huge issue with the plans, but I'm just not comfortable with Morfuni and co being in charge, given their track record.
Agreed, even as a displaced fan I can see the benefits to a development, but wouldn’t trust this group to organise cleaning the toilets, yet alone redeveloping our newest stand |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
STFC 4 Arsenal 3, the best birthday present ever
|
|
|
Audrey
Offline
Posts: 20477
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #18542 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:00:08 » |
|
It’s a no from me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FreddySTFC!
Offline
Posts: 1597
|
|
« Reply #18543 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:00:50 » |
|
Just voted no as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have a culture, I don't stop my culture!!
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23753
|
|
« Reply #18544 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:01:16 » |
|
I'll vote no, but I'd rather a Yes than a narrow no. Think that's the worst case scenario here, if we get a two-thirds-in-favour no.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lemis
Offline
Posts: 495
|
|
« Reply #18545 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:07:05 » |
|
Voted no.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Have you seen the writing on the wall?
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 65208
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #18546 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:07:44 » |
|
This.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
theakston2k
Offline
Posts: 5866
|
|
« Reply #18547 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:08:49 » |
|
A no from me as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundaboutred
Offline
Posts: 87
|
|
« Reply #18548 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:09:55 » |
|
It's a no from me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
iParadise
 Online
Posts: 982
|
|
« Reply #18549 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:11:47 » |
|
Just voted no
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
|
« Reply #18550 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:12:27 » |
|
I would be a hypocrite to vote yes. as much as I crave redevelopment and the opportunity to progress as a club, I don't trust and think these owners can pull this off. Its a no from me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 58067
|
|
« Reply #18551 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:15:49 » |
|
It's genuinely not an easy decision.
There's zero evidence they can pull this off, and plenty to suggest we are already struggling to keep our heads above water.
The risk of becoming north haverbrook is too high.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Midland Red
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #18552 on: Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 16:30:45 » |
|
Watching this unfold from afar, I wonder how many will fill the boxes and will pay the premium for the seats behind them. But I am most interested to work out where the housing that keep getting mentioned are planned to be, are they going to put them on the grass on Shrivenham Road?
I assume the hotel is planned for the town end (good-bye car park)
Are there any plans on the net
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
