Batch
Not a Batch
 Offline
Posts: 57826
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 08:18:41 » |
|
But could be useless to us if its a little bit now, the rest later
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
 Online
Posts: 29838
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 08:41:18 » |
|
But could be useless to us if its a little bit now, the rest later
This is true. Will be interesting to see how the deal is structured. As Flint is young, it could very well be based on future performances etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 08:48:03 » |
|
Will be cold hard cash upfront
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Online
Posts: 29838
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 09:23:53 » |
|
Will be cold hard cash upfront
How can you be so sure? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57826
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 09:25:57 » |
|
Will be cold hard cash upfront
That's what we need, but have City offered it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 09:28:22 » |
|
We wont take just shitty little offers,i dont doubt that deals will involve add ons etc but cant see us taking buy now pay later offers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57826
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Friday, May 24, 2013, 10:35:53 » |
|
Oh I agree. I was musing that a buy now pay later may be why we dismissed City's bids.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 19181
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 07:55:08 » |
|
Hidden away in the McCormack story that Shitty are paying £350k and separately covering the sell on clause to Alfreton - bloody hell someone drive him down there now to sign for them at that money.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 08:03:24 » |
|
Hidden away in the McCormack story that Shitty are paying £350k and separately covering the sell on clause to Alfreton - bloody hell someone drive him down there now to sign for them at that money.
AND we've got a future sell on fee included in that. We've taken City to the cleaners! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Online
Posts: 29838
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 08:22:34 » |
|
Hidden away in the McCormack story that Shitty are paying £350k and separately covering the sell on clause to Alfreton - bloody hell someone drive him down there now to sign for them at that money.
I think Jed and Co have done well there. Sure someone else will say it, but what a shame we got such a pittance for Ritchie. Ah well, thats done now, time to move on! Looking forward to see who we bring in now to replace him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
cheltred69
Offline
Posts: 1058
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 08:33:15 » |
|
I think Jed and Co have done well there.
Sure someone else will say it, but what a shame we got such a pittance for Ritchie. Ah well, thats done now, time to move on!
Looking forward to see who we bring in now to replace him.
Shows the difference when you have negotiating power. Ritchie was a fire sale plain and simple, biggest shame was that we didn't use the full transfer window to draw in other potential purchasers. Deal for Flint goes well beyond what I thought was possible. Still, looking at the thisis comments (why do I do it?) they live in a parallel universe where we're getting screwed! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Online
Posts: 23620
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 08:48:00 » |
|
Decent fee that if is completely correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 08:49:36 » |
|
Credit where it is due, if that is correct (reported transfer details are never accurate).
Previous boards have never maximised potential transfer fees with first team players, our previous board weren’t that good with this either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 09:23:41 » |
|
This almost offsets the disappointment at the Ritchie news. Something in the vicinity of £1 million for Ritchie + Flint feels about right to me.
Sorry to see Aden go, mind. Wish him well in future...just so long as he doesn't take City up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Wednesday, May 29, 2013, 09:34:11 » |
|
Still, looking at the thisis comments (why do I do it?) they live in a parallel universe where we're getting screwed! They think we should be getting a higher fee for Flint? The reported fee is already about 3 times what he is worth! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
