Batch
Not a Batch
 Offline
Posts: 57746
|
 |
« Reply #12405 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 08:54:31 » |
|
According to the Brum forum Caddis signed on a year long loan not the 6 months reported on here.
It was year long. Originally reported as 6 months, but corrected to season long by the Adver - I sit next to a Birmingham fan at work, we had this conversation just the other day! This link confirms season long loan. http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/sportlatest/10131033.Caddis_poised_to_make_permanent_Birmingham_switch/The full-back, who joined the Championship outfit on a season-long loan in the summer, is....
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 08:56:23 by Batch »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #12406 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 08:55:58 » |
|
Hopefully Austin goes somewhere for a small fortune, mind you if he keeps scoring and does not go till the summer then we will use the funds for the Championship campagne.
It won't be huge sums coming our way - even if he went for £10m we'd only get a few hundred thousand I believe. Invaluable and not to be sniffed at sure, but not a massive windfall that some still seem to hope for. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64637
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #12407 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 08:59:03 » |
|
It won't be huge sums coming our way - even if he went for £10m we'd only get a few hundred thousand I believe. Invaluable and not to be sniffed at sure, but not a massive windfall that some still seem to hope for.
I had heard from reputable sauces it was between 20 and 25% of the profit of the deal...he left for £1.5m so if he went for £10m as you state we would have a cash windfall of approx £2m. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #12408 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 08:59:56 » |
|
It won't be huge sums coming our way - even if he went for £10m we'd only get a few hundred thousand I believe. Invaluable and not to be sniffed at sure, but not a massive windfall that some still seem to hope for.
Yeh the noises from the board room were that it wouldn't be much. I was hoping for 20% and would have thought we should have put that in at the time. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #12409 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:01:30 » |
|
I had heard from reputable sauces it was between 20 and 25% of the profit of the deal...he left for £1.5m so if he went for £10m as you state we would have a cash windfall of approx £2m.
Fair enough if that is indeed the case, I'd be happy to be mistaken here! I just remember Watkins saying expectations should be tempered for what we'll receive in the event of his transfer. Does some of the fee not still have to be passed to Poole also? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64637
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #12410 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:05:27 » |
|
There was a knock on payment to Poole in there according to Watkins or Wray a small percentage but enough to keep them going, I understand the "small" figure was based upon if Charlie went for a (quoted at the time) £3m transfer fee....obviously the fee would be more the more Burnley get.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26742
|
|
« Reply #12411 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:05:33 » |
|
got a link for the austin rumour JJ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64637
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #12412 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:06:50 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26742
|
|
« Reply #12413 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:11:07 » |
|
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
|
« Reply #12414 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:12:33 » |
|
Tbh Watkins isnt going to say yeah we will get shit loads is he
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64637
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #12415 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:15:56 » |
|
Tbh Watkins isnt going to say yeah we will get shit loads is he
Thats very true. One of the reasons why many fees are "undisclosed" now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #12416 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:16:22 » |
|
Tbh Watkins isnt going to say yeah we will get shit loads is he
No but presumably there's no reason he couldn't give an idea as to the % sell on we'll receive? Not unusual for that aspect of a transfer to be made public. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #12417 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:20:34 » |
|
No but presumably there's no reason he couldn't give an idea as to the % sell on we'll receive?
Would that not basically be the same as saying: "Yeah, we'll get shitloads" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #12418 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:22:23 » |
|
Would that not basically be the same as saying: "Yeah, we'll get shitloads"
Suppose so, depends how much he goes for though doesn't it? Personally don't see the big need to keep it under wraps. Anyway, we'll get what we get whenever he does move. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #12419 on: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 09:28:24 » |
|
Personally don't see the big need to keep it under wraps. Anyway, we'll get what we get whenever he does move.
Me neither but that seems to be the way we and a lot of clubs do business nowadays. Don't think anyone will argue with your last sentence anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
