Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 [24] 25 26   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: the countdown to 52  (Read 45995 times)
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #345 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 12:41:42 »

 We can't finish on 52 points any longer...
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 32129


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #346 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 12:50:23 »

No update after picking up 3 points at the weekend then. How strange, DV can't normally wait to bang on the stats confirming doom and gloom.

Sorry boss, I was sat on Lara Beach in Turkey all of the last week Smiley

We can't finish on 52 points any longer...

38+15=53
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12507




« Reply #347 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:05:37 »

Looks to me like there are going to be 6 teams that finish with less than 50 points. Typical Swindon to get relegated from the shittest League One in 10 years.
Logged
dave_bambers_right_sock

Offline Offline

Posts: 866





Ignore
« Reply #348 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:06:17 »

In terms of relegation, I'd say we're at about 27 seconds on this at the moment...



Think they should make the team run out to this at the next 2 home games
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #349 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:13:33 »



38+15=53

I think reg meant that it's impossible for us to get exactly 52. You can't get 14 points out of 15
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 32129


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #350 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:14:53 »

Oldham 57
Sheffield Wednesday 56
Yeovil 54
Tranmere 53
Dagenham 52
Notts County 50
----------------------------
Bristol Rovers 48
Walsall 46
Swindon 43
Plymouth 43

Obviously ppg will change between now and the end of the season but going on current ppg plus a bit of rounding up/down - current the table come 46 games would look like that!!

50 points being enough.

We'll see, even to get to 50 we'd need 12 points from 15.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 32129


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #351 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:16:01 »

I think reg meant that it's impossible for us to get exactly 52. You can't get 14 points out of 15

d'oh of course!

but then before saturday we couldnt get 17 points from 6 games either
Logged
Nick Bamosomi
Bitter & Twisted

Offline Offline

Posts: 2043





Ignore
« Reply #352 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:11:22 »

d'oh of course!

but then before saturday we couldnt get 17 points from 6 games either

And before that we only just managed 6 points from 17 games!! Cheesy
Logged

Never , under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same  night
THE FLASH

Offline Offline

Posts: 9382


Quick as a Flash!




Ignore
« Reply #353 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:25:52 »

I put my Calculator away after the Walsall, Muff, Daggers one two three with no win.....Its over.
Logged

Clems Army!
Paolo69

Offline Offline

Posts: 2790





Ignore
« Reply #354 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:31:08 »

Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.

Just the 4 wins we need then.
Logged
THE FLASH

Offline Offline

Posts: 9382


Quick as a Flash!




Ignore
« Reply #355 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:34:36 »

Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.

Just the 4 wins we need then.

We will get three needing to win at Tranmere then in true Swindon style get butt fucked by the mock scousers!
Logged

Clems Army!
DiV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 32129


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #356 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:46:12 »

Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.

Just the 4 wins we need then.

but no team goes down with 52 hence its the number to aim for.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #357 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:03:52 »

but no team goes down with 52 hence its the number to aim for.

We went down with 52 in 81/82...
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 32129


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #358 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:06:16 »

the previous poster was looking over the last 10 years.

81/82 wasnt within the last 10 years,
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #359 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:08:42 »

the previous poster was looking over the last 10 years.

81/82 wasnt within the last 10 years,

All very well, but your assertion stated that "no team goes down with 52" the temporal proviso was missing
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 [24] 25 26   Go Up
Print
Jump to: