STFC Transfer Rumours

[Benzel]

Yeah I totally get it from a business pov, his value has gone down since he got here and if anything RW has probably managed to put a little bit back on it, so it would make complete sense to get what we can for him. But from a purely human perspective I'd just feel a bit gutted for him. He'd still get a medal I believe. (assuming we go up/win the league!)

Sent from my CLT-L09

[Bob's Orange]

That was done on purpose, honest!!

[Peter Venkman]

I wouldnt get rid of Woolery, I think hes a great squad player and has improved a lot this season.

[Red Frog]

That was done on purpose, honest!!

OK, so I wasn't going to do this, but...

I'm not preaching by the way, i'm equally as guilty* (I had to use a search engine for the correct spelling!

*equally guilty.  Or "just as guilty". ("equally as" is pleonastic.)

 

[Bob's Orange]

Stop being a pidant.

[Gnasher]

Obviously, we have no idea if anyone has even bid for Woolery, and if there was a bit it could be Isgrove, Rose etc.

You can tell from RW's interviews that Woolery frustrates him a little (with the exception of Saturday), but over the last 3-4 games KW has really proved his worth - causing havoc with his runs, which creates space for others. He's even winning headers! I'd be sad to see him leave, just as he's finally finding some form.

[Peter Venkman]

Stop being a pidant.

I see what you did there BO.

[swindonmaniac]

RW was very clear that Wednesday is the day.

It makes sense that Bradford have agreed to a deal but from tomorrow - why give us him early?

On Woolery - I'd be surprised to see him go. He's incredibly useful, even if he's not starting games. Allows us to play a different way, more direct. He's good in the air, is the main target for Benda's long clearances etc.
6
When everyone's fit, he's a good option from the bench.

Exactly,  he would be a superb back up but he would probably struggle to be a regular first teamer with the squad we appear to be accumulating at the moment.    Thing is I suppose is with him being OOC at the end of the season he could walk away for nothing,  discussions have probably already been had, guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Regarding Bradford letting us have Doyle early (Assuming that the deal go's ahead) they didn't,  they let us have him late !!!, had we signed him yesterday he could have played tonight,   so in theory,  we're only getting one game out of him inside the window, which is the way I've said all the way along I felt that it would pan out, Bradford depriving us  of his services for as long as ppossible in order to derail us.  Anyway,  it's all looking rosy at present,  what a difference a month makes.

[The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey]

So, devil’s advocate.

Woolery or Isgrove?

[horlock07]

Assuming the best happens with Doyle, I cannot deny that it would be hilarious if he came back here, scored a brace on his second debut and then continued to bang them in!

[Peter Venkman]

Assuming the best happens with Doyle, I cannot deny that it would be hilarious if he came back here, scored a brace on his second debut and then continued to bang them in!

Why stop at a brace, I will be disappointed if he didn't grab a hattrick upon his return now that was really piss on Bradford fans chips!

[Panda Paws]

So, devil’s advocate.

Woolery or Isgrove?

Right now, Woolery is more important to this team.

Don't want either of them to leave though.

[Flashheart]

Isgrove seems to have lost some of his mojo lately.

[Batch]

taking him a while to get back into it from injury. I hope

[singingiiiffy]

Isgrove;
Starting eleven: 20, Substituted in: 3, Goals: 0 Assists: 5

Woolery;
Starting eleven: 18, Substituted in: 10, Goals: 2 Assists: 7

Its worth pointing out that all 5 of isgroves assists came within his first 7 games! The following 9 games he struggled for form and minutes and then his injury.