Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #345 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 12:41:42 » |
|
We can't finish on 52 points any longer...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32335
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #346 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 12:50:23 » |
|
No update after picking up 3 points at the weekend then. How strange, DV can't normally wait to bang on the stats confirming doom and gloom.
Sorry boss, I was sat on Lara Beach in Turkey all of the last week We can't finish on 52 points any longer...
38+15=53
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12534
|
|
« Reply #347 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:05:37 » |
|
Looks to me like there are going to be 6 teams that finish with less than 50 points. Typical Swindon to get relegated from the shittest League One in 10 years.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dave_bambers_right_sock
Offline
Posts: 866
|
|
« Reply #348 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:06:17 » |
|
In terms of relegation, I'd say we're at about 27 seconds on this at the moment...
Think they should make the team run out to this at the next 2 home games
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #349 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:13:33 » |
|
38+15=53
I think reg meant that it's impossible for us to get exactly 52. You can't get 14 points out of 15
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32335
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #350 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:14:53 » |
|
Oldham 57 Sheffield Wednesday 56 Yeovil 54 Tranmere 53 Dagenham 52 Notts County 50 ---------------------------- Bristol Rovers 48 Walsall 46 Swindon 43 Plymouth 43
Obviously ppg will change between now and the end of the season but going on current ppg plus a bit of rounding up/down - current the table come 46 games would look like that!!
50 points being enough.
We'll see, even to get to 50 we'd need 12 points from 15.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32335
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #351 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 13:16:01 » |
|
I think reg meant that it's impossible for us to get exactly 52. You can't get 14 points out of 15
d'oh of course! but then before saturday we couldnt get 17 points from 6 games either
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nick Bamosomi
Bitter & Twisted
Offline
Posts: 2043
|
|
« Reply #352 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:11:22 » |
|
d'oh of course!
but then before saturday we couldnt get 17 points from 6 games either
And before that we only just managed 6 points from 17 games!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never , under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9421
Quick as a Flash!
|
|
« Reply #353 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:25:52 » |
|
I put my Calculator away after the Walsall, Muff, Daggers one two three with no win.....Its over.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #354 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:31:08 » |
|
Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.
Just the 4 wins we need then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9421
Quick as a Flash!
|
|
« Reply #355 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:34:36 » |
|
Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.
Just the 4 wins we need then.
We will get three needing to win at Tranmere then in true Swindon style get butt fucked by the mock scousers!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32335
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #356 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 15:46:12 » |
|
Being an anorak and looking back at old league tables suggests that 50 points would have been enough in the majority of the last 10 years anyway.
Just the 4 wins we need then.
but no team goes down with 52 hence its the number to aim for.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #357 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:03:52 » |
|
but no team goes down with 52 hence its the number to aim for.
We went down with 52 in 81/82...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32335
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #358 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:06:16 » |
|
the previous poster was looking over the last 10 years.
81/82 wasnt within the last 10 years,
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #359 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 16:08:42 » |
|
the previous poster was looking over the last 10 years.
81/82 wasnt within the last 10 years,
All very well, but your assertion stated that "no team goes down with 52" the temporal proviso was missing
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|