Swindon 3-2 Sutton United MoM Thread

[Peter Venkman]

Opinions and arseholes my friend!

Indeed it is mate, I guess we all look at different attributes in players.

As we do in manager.....now thats a whole new kettle of dogfood

[SpeakingFluentPeroni]

My view of it was that Shade  didn’t kick the camera, he fell over the photographer’s bag accidentally and then went and apologised to him for it which was a classy move. Hopefully the goal will do his confidence some good, guessing he must be showing something in training to get the starting place.

[NotHarryAgombar]

Gladwin - excellent performance, brilliant long range passes, created several chances and crucially won the ball back before Shade’s goal.
Williams and Blake-Tracey also put in strong performances.

[skiptotheLouMacari]

Opted for Darcy, thought he worked well with ball however was caught out for the equaliser. Gladwin Reed Williams all had very good games. Mcdonald isn't afraid to get his foot in. Shade was good gong forward but when the opportunity came to move into open space in front of him he was often behind the ball trying to keep up.
Jephcott was unlucky with a couple best game for Hutton as he showed attacking threat.
I enjoyed it so much I'm going to Donny

[Quagmire]

Literally this, he's solid at defending, just hopeless at passing.

Thought Lavenier, Gladwin, Reed all decent enough. Williams at his best.

Lavinier? Really?

[Jimmy Quinn]

I didn't see the game but Hale on the radio said how impressed he was with Lavenier.

[Peter Venkman]

Lavinier looked pretty good going forwards but defensively much like KKH.

He still looked better defensively than Hutton for me but he is raw and didnt play as well as he did away at Jills last week. Saying that he was carried off late in the gameso could be badly injured, holding his thigh.

[RobertT]

Lavinier looked, based solely on that game, like a moderated version of Hutton.  Good going forward, but not as much of a threat that Hutton looks like he might be when he gets a head of steam up, and terrible defensively, but not as much of a liability that Hutton has looked.

He looks, like a lot of our team, like someone who needs a season or two of development.

[DMC]

Lavinier looked, based solely on that game, like a moderated version of Hutton.  Good going forward, but not as much of a threat that Hutton looks like he might be when he gets a head of steam up, and terrible defensively, but not as much of a liability that Hutton has looked.

He looks, like a lot of our team, like someone who needs a season or two of development.

A league 2 player then 

[fuzzy]

Gladwin got my vote as he played some excellent passes and brought a few other players into the game.

He wasn't perfect but no one is at this level.

[Audrey]

Don’t remember him getting caught in possession or giving the ball away either.

Great performance.

[adje]

So Gladders and Williams CAN play together then.

[fuzzy]

On last nights showing, yes.

[RobertT]

A league 2 player then 

I'd say he is still ab it raw - that could develop quickly though.  If I was putting together a team to gain instant promotion from this division, he'd be OK as my back-up, giving him the time to develop without risking too much on the results front.  Same goes for Hutton, who'd be behind him in the right back pecking order though.

[dagrumpymunki]

So Gladders and Williams CAN play together then.

Yes I just don't think they could play together in central midfield