Poll
Question: Who gets your vote?  (Voting closed: Friday, September 16, 2022, 20:28:38)
Sol Brynn - 4 (6.3%)
Marcel Lavinier (sub 81) - 1 (1.6%)
Tom Clayton - 0 (0%)
Angus MacDonald - 4 (6.3%)
Frazer Blake-Tracy - 0 (0%)
Louis Reed (sub 93) - 0 (0%)
Ronan Darcy (sub 60) - 1 (1.6%)
Ben Gladwin - 16 (25%)
Jonny Williams - 33 (51.6%)
Luke Jephcott (sub 60) - 0 (0%)
Tyrese Shade - 3 (4.7%)
Jacob Wakeling (on 60) - 2 (3.1%)
Saidou Khan (on 60) - 0 (0%)
Remeao Hutton (on 81) - 0 (0%)
Mathieu Baudry (on 93) - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 63

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Swindon 3-2 Sutton United MoM Thread  (Read 4225 times)
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.

Offline Offline

Posts: 58868


Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.



« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 09:49:47 »

Opinions and arseholes my friend! Smiley
Indeed it is mate, I guess we all look at different attributes in players.

As we do in manager.....now thats a whole new kettle of dogfood Smiley
Logged

Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
SpeakingFluentPeroni

« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 10:28:45 »

My view of it was that Shade  didn’t kick the camera, he fell over the photographer’s bag accidentally and then went and apologised to him for it which was a classy move. Hopefully the goal will do his confidence some good, guessing he must be showing something in training to get the starting place.
Logged
NotHarryAgombar

Offline Offline

Posts: 424




Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 10:49:20 »

Gladwin - excellent performance, brilliant long range passes, created several chances and crucially won the ball back before Shade’s goal.
Williams and Blake-Tracey also put in strong performances.
Logged
skiptotheLouMacari

Offline Offline

Posts: 964





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 11:52:22 »

Opted for Darcy, thought he worked well with ball however was caught out for the equaliser. Gladwin Reed Williams all had very good games. Mcdonald isn't afraid to get his foot in. Shade was good gong forward but when the opportunity came to move into open space in front of him he was often behind the ball trying to keep up.
Jephcott was unlucky with a couple best game for Hutton as he showed attacking threat.
I enjoyed it so much I'm going to Donny
Logged
Quagmire

Offline Offline

Posts: 4598





Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 11:53:49 »

Literally this, he's solid at defending, just hopeless at passing.

Thought Lavenier, Gladwin, Reed all decent enough. Williams at his best.


Lavinier? Really?
Logged
Jimmy HaveHave

Offline Offline

Posts: 15084





Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 12:00:15 »

I didn't see the game but Hale on the radio said how impressed he was with Lavenier.
Logged

So, give no fucks
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.

Offline Offline

Posts: 58868


Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.



« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 12:07:10 »

Lavinier looked pretty good going forwards but defensively much like KKH.

He still looked better defensively than Hutton for me but he is raw and didnt play as well as he did away at Jills last week. Saying that he was carried off late in the gameso could be badly injured, holding his thigh.
Logged

Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11646




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 12:13:32 »

Lavinier looked, based solely on that game, like a moderated version of Hutton.  Good going forward, but not as much of a threat that Hutton looks like he might be when he gets a head of steam up, and terrible defensively, but not as much of a liability that Hutton has looked.

He looks, like a lot of our team, like someone who needs a season or two of development.
Logged
DMC

« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 13:02:10 »

Lavinier looked, based solely on that game, like a moderated version of Hutton.  Good going forward, but not as much of a threat that Hutton looks like he might be when he gets a head of steam up, and terrible defensively, but not as much of a liability that Hutton has looked.

He looks, like a lot of our team, like someone who needs a season or two of development.
A league 2 player then  Smiley
Logged
fuzzy

Offline Offline

Posts: 1309


A Bastard apparently




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 15:08:15 »

Gladwin got my vote as he played some excellent passes and brought a few other players into the game.

He wasn't perfect but no one is at this level.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19291


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 15:13:44 »

Don’t remember him getting caught in possession or giving the ball away either.

Great performance.
Logged
adje

Online Online

Posts: 13519





Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 16:03:10 »

So Gladders and Williams CAN play together then.
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
fuzzy

Offline Offline

Posts: 1309


A Bastard apparently




Ignore
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 16:26:41 »

On last nights showing, yes.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11646




Ignore
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 17:16:43 »

A league 2 player then  Smiley

I'd say he is still ab it raw - that could develop quickly though.  If I was putting together a team to gain instant promotion from this division, he'd be OK as my back-up, giving him the time to develop without risking too much on the results front.  Same goes for Hutton, who'd be behind him in the right back pecking order though.
Logged
dalumpimunki

Offline Offline

Posts: 1075





Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 20:10:30 »

So Gladders and Williams CAN play together then.

Yes I just don't think they could play together in central midfield
Logged

..never go back.
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: