Pages: 1 ... 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 ... 803   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: New beginnings - 25% Truth, 80% Bollocks  (Read 1123328 times)
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55166





Ignore
« Reply #1185 on: Saturday, December 4, 2021, 23:36:12 »

Quote from: tans
Able issue a winding up order.

Good luck with that one

wtf!!
Logged
BambooToTheFuture

Offline Offline

Posts: 10081


I'll Tell Ya Now - McGurk Is The New Graham


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1186 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 00:18:16 »

I gather a certain person with the surname "Power" has likely been on the icing sugar and came up with the confidence to submit this petition?!

That dude gets more like Tony Tucker every day!  Pint

Serious questions here:
How in the hell can a "company" submit a petition, still expect to remain mostly anonymous (especially considering their supposed involvement), and be purely represented by a solicitor?

Is it perfectly legal for them to do as such?
And if so, does it actually help, hinder, impact any gravitas for genuine claims if they submit it anonymously (personnel wise)?
Surely someone from that company has to make themselves known?

Of course, it's likely we all know who "ABLE" is anyway. It'd look incredibly stupid if "he" rolled up to the courtroom/Teams meeting but we all know these days people don't even need to show their face.

Hopefully this falls flat on it's face and the court will see right through this  Roll Eyes
*crosses all sets of six fingers and toes*
Logged


'Incessant Nonsense'

______________________________________________________________

'I'm gonna tell you the secret.
There's a threat, you end it and you don't feel ashamed about enjoying it.
You smell the gunpowder and you see the blood, you know what that means?
It means you're alive. You've won.
You take the heads so that you don't ever forget.'
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19291


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #1187 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 07:15:06 »

Here it is

Logged
Dr Pierre Chang
ITK Curran lover

Offline Offline

Posts: 2996





Ignore
« Reply #1188 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 08:11:06 »

There’s another advisory board meeting imminent (if not already held) so I expect we’ll find out more then at least.
Logged
Crackity Jones

« Reply #1189 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 08:31:27 »

The minutes from the last advisory board stated that Able were threatening a petition and that the legal team were all over it. I can't recall or find the figure that Able supposedly put into the club - c.100k springs to mind.
Logged
JBZ
Not as likeable as Reg was, a fencesitting WUM

Offline Offline

Posts: 3264


Allegedly, not a Swindon Town supporter




Ignore
« Reply #1190 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:08:50 »

Winders shouldn't be used for disputed sums.  If it is disputed, I wonder why the debtor didn't apply for an injunction to restrain presentation of a petition.
Logged

Nothing to see here
Crackity Jones

« Reply #1191 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:16:20 »

Winders shouldn't be used for disputed sums.  If it is disputed, I wonder why the debtor didn't apply for an injunction to restrain presentation of a petition.
HMRC regularly do this for non-payment don't they?
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55166





Ignore
« Reply #1192 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:31:20 »

2.1 EP provided Legal update and noted he would need to leave the meeting after his update due to work commitments. EP provided an update on current legal issues that the Club is dealing
with. Starting with a legal claim from Able for an alleged loan to the Club. There are questions on how the loan was made and who made it and their links with the previous ownership. EP is
working to defend the claim as best possible for the Club

(October)
Logged
Legends-Lounge

Online Online

Posts: 8155

Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this




Ignore
« Reply #1193 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:35:16 »

I’m wondering if we can counter sue for anything?
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55166





Ignore
« Reply #1194 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:40:40 »

November minutes: Able
– a petition has been threatened but EP has challenged and appointed a QC to help STFC fight the claims for the debts
Logged
JBZ
Not as likeable as Reg was, a fencesitting WUM

Offline Offline

Posts: 3264


Allegedly, not a Swindon Town supporter




Ignore
« Reply #1195 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:47:48 »

If the debtor can show that the 'debt' is disputed on grounds that appear substantial, the petition should be dismissed.

If the debt is disputed, it should be pursued as a county court/high court claim, depending on the financial value.

Logged

Nothing to see here
JBZ
Not as likeable as Reg was, a fencesitting WUM

Offline Offline

Posts: 3264


Allegedly, not a Swindon Town supporter




Ignore
« Reply #1196 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 09:48:56 »

HMRC regularly do this for non-payment don't they?

Not much of a dispute where unpaid tax is concerned
Logged

Nothing to see here
Crackity Jones

« Reply #1197 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 10:01:44 »

Not much of a dispute where unpaid tax is concerned
so by going down this route, are able saying there is no dispute?
Logged
Legends-Lounge

Online Online

Posts: 8155

Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this




Ignore
« Reply #1198 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 10:03:33 »

Was it ever established who was or is behind Able?
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55166





Ignore
« Reply #1199 on: Sunday, December 5, 2021, 10:18:18 »

Quote from: Legends-Lounge
Was it ever established who was or is behind Able?

not really

a couple of names US side and a bucket load of suspicion
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 ... 803   Go Up
Print
Jump to: