Let's Get Political!

[Mister Lorenzo]

Did anyone hear this interview?

https://order-order.com/2018/04/13/diane-abbott-car-crash-ww2-only-time-wed-back-military-action/


Long may she have a prominent role in Corbyn's "politburo" 

[McGurk's Missus]

So while America, France, and much likely the U.K consider bombing the shit out of Syria (once again), the lead story on the opening news titles was Cliff fucking Richards!

[hobodan]

Hardly. A few cruise missiles on Syrian abandoned airports doesn’t quantify “bombing the shit” in my book.
I can’t see any reason for Assad using chemical weapons when ISIS and the rebels have all but been subdued; But we mere civilians will never be privileged to the evidence of our military services.
Ironically the American people that voted against Hiller Clinton did so because of her warmongering language regarding Russia, will Trump take the US to war over Syria? I don’t think so. Lots of chest thumping from from Putin is not going deter the allies one iota, Russia has an economy smaller than Texas and America’s military spending is huge compared to every other nation on earth. Whether the allies make a token military strike is irrelevant, Russia is not about to retaliate against sources from missile launch sites, they do at their peril.
Syria will remain a proxy battle field for the foreseeable, with no sides committed to deploying what is really needed, ‘troops on the ground’ and democracy for the people.
The eyes really should be focusing on Israel and Iran, as that is much more likely to escalate. Corbyn has his colours nailed to the mast for this fight 🧐

[Ells]

You can't spell apparently.

[Flashheart]

What are the Russians going to do? What can they do? Attack a base? Try and shoot down a plane?

[Saxondale]

Probably just release the piss tapes or cut the supply of gas to the west.

[McGurk's Missus]

Hardly. A few cruise missiles on Syrian abandoned airports doesn’t quantify “bombing the shit” in my book.
I can’t see any reason for Assad using chemical weapons when ISIS and the rebels have all but been subdued; But we mere civilians will never be privileged to the evidence of our military services.
Ironically the American people that voted against Hiller Clinton did so because of her warmongering language regarding Russia, will Trump take the US to war over Syria? I don’t think so. Lots of chest thumping from from Putin is not going deter the allies one iota, Russia has an economy smaller than Texas and America’s military spending is huge compared to every other nation on earth. Whether the allies make a token military strike is irrelevant, Russia is not about to retaliate against sources from missile launch sites, they do at their peril.
Syria will remain a proxy battle field for the foreseeable, with no sides committed to deploying what is really needed, ‘troops on the ground’ and democracy for the people.
The eyes really should be focusing on Israel and Iran, as that is much more likely to escalate. Corbyn has his colours nailed to the mast for this fight 🧐

Still waiting to read your answers I put to you. It was a genuine set of questions. 

[hobodan]

I’m not sure what makes you think I would want to sit and answer 20 odd questions from someone I have no interest in educating?
I’ll give you one question and maybe you could reciprocate.

[jayohaitchenn]

I've got one. Why are you such a fucking cunt?

[hobodan]

I've got one. Why are you such a fucking cunt?

And here’s me thinking it was a badge of honour around these parts....

[Arriba]

If the chemical producing venues were destroyed successfully, what has happened to all those chemicals?
Aren't all bombs made of chemicals by the way? Is it that some chemicals are worse than others? I'm guessing the weapons we sell to other nations and use ourselves are good weapons and the way they kill is acceptable?

[McGurk's Missus]

If the chemical producing venues were destroyed successfully, what has happened to all those chemicals?
Aren't all bombs made of chemicals by the way? Is it that some chemicals are worse than others? I'm guessing the weapons we sell to other nations and use ourselves are good weapons and the way they kill is acceptable?

I always find it incredible that ourselves and the U.S are deemed 'stable' enough to manufacture and maintain nuclear weapons, yet we're led the line that pretty much anyone else who does would use them at will. Yes i'm aware there are some dangerous fuckers intent on trying to destroy the world out there, however the irony of it all is, the U.K is far from being stable and the U.S has an incumbent who believes he is very stable. When looking for people we believe to be dangerous, maybe we should be looking at our own leaders.

[McGurk's Missus]

I’m not sure what makes you think I would want to sit and answer 20 odd questions from someone I have no interest in educating?
I’ll give you one question and maybe you could reciprocate.

Ohh but hobodan, why so much anger and defensive talk? There are a variety of questions in there, some more pointless than others. It's not about educating, it's about cohesion see. I wanted to understand you and your angle of things. Life in general, your favourite cheese, how you came to be such a cunt (like most of us are), who's hand you first bit that fed you, and if you have a shared interest in Palynology? You know, just the every day stuff. 

[Arriba]

I always find it incredible that ourselves and the U.S are deemed 'stable' enough to manufacture and maintain nuclear weapons, yet we're led the line that pretty much anyone else who does would use them at will. Yes i'm aware there are some dangerous fuckers intent on trying to destroy the world out there, however the irony of it all is, the U.K is far from being stable and the U.S has an incumbent who believes he is very stable. When looking for people we believe to be dangerous, maybe we should be looking at our own leaders.

Good points, well made.

[McGurk's Missus]

Good points, well made.

Thanks, reading it back...I'm putting it on twitter (no one will read it though).