suttonred
 Offline
Posts: 12510
|
 |
« Reply #615 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 12:30:57 » |
|
I wont bother reading that pile of crap, but do they think we managed the adjudication panel then? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59259
Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.
|
|
« Reply #616 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 12:42:19 » |
|
I wont bother reading that pile of crap, but do they think we managed the adjudication panel then?
Yes because the Football League love Swindon  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
Exiled Bob
Offline
Posts: 1514
Likes a moan
|
|
« Reply #617 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 12:45:09 » |
|
Cotterill's a knob. Cotterill told www.bcfc.co.uk: "This decision does not support the implication of guilt, more that the video evidence available to us was not conducive for the panel to be able to overturn the referee's decision. It's hugely frustrating and unjust that Wade will now serve a three-match ban. The video evidence was inconclusive - as anyone who has seen it could confirm. Yet he claimed that he'd watched it 4 times and it proved that Elliot was innocent. He also admitted he hadn't seen the incident apart from on the video so how he can claim that it is unjust shows what a prick he is. Pity a game wasn't added on to the ban to really rub it in..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #618 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 12:54:47 » |
|
I wont bother reading that pile of crap, but do they think we managed the adjudication panel then?
The level of mongularity on there makes thisis look measured....there's a thread, where they think that they shouldn't debate players/tactics etc on OTIB, because opposition spies are reading it in order to gain an insight into how to beat them  Marvellous |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #619 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 13:08:40 » |
|
Cotterill's a knob.
The video evidence was inconclusive - as anyone who has seen it could confirm. Yet he claimed that he'd watched it 4 times and it proved that Elliot was innocent. He also admitted he hadn't seen the incident apart from on the video so how he can claim that it is unjust shows what a prick he is. Pity a game wasn't added on to the ban to really rub it in.....
That's about right. Was just about to write exactly the same Bob. Maybe Cotterill should have showed the football league the video he watched 4 times, there would have been no doubt then. Oh, wait a minute! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #620 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 13:15:49 » |
|
I'm flipping annoyed about the injustice of this. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty, it seems the opposite here, you must be guilty as we can't prove otherwise. He was found guilty by the ref and lino you feeble minded tool. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #621 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 13:50:39 » |
|
He was found guilty by the ref and lino you Fucking thick yokel.
Made it more street speak for you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Outletred
Offline
Posts: 651
|
|
« Reply #622 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 13:53:56 » |
|
i work in Bristol and they are fuming over it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #623 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 14:38:58 » |
|
They didn't actually write 'flipping' did they?
Strong stuff indeed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6146
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #624 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 14:59:29 » |
|
Well the oracle has spoken, apparently they consulted him before rejecting the appeal!! Curly Withers said it was a definite sending off, saw it in the tea leaves!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15983
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #625 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 15:54:05 » |
|
Cotterill has suggested it can't be a red card because Elliott has no history of head butting. Shall we ignore the fact he ended O'Halloran's career with a leg breaking challenge?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #626 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 16:11:44 » |
|
I don't think so. I've no history of shitting my pants, but its bound to happen along the line somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Costanza
Offline
Posts: 10643
|
|
« Reply #627 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 16:23:04 » |
|
Wade Elliott isn't stupid, he knew what he was doing and was possibly hoping for a reaction similar to that of Alex Pritchard's at Ashton Gate last season when he cynically hacked him down.
Stephens is all over Elliott so if he tries to sneak a little bit of contact on him then he might have hoped for Stephens to lash out like Pritchard did.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 16:26:12 by Costanza »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Paolo69
Offline
Posts: 2790
|
|
« Reply #628 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 16:30:08 » |
|
Wade Elliott isn't stupid, he knew what he was doing and was possibly hoping for a reaction similar to that of Alex Pritchard's at Ashton Gate last season when he cynically hacked him down last season.
Stephens is all over Elliott so if he tries to sneak a little bit of contact on him then he might have hoped for Stephens to lash out like Pritchard did.
Spot on. Elliott was being called a clever pro last year when he managed to get Pritch to retaliate. Experience over youth. Pritchard too petulant. Blah blah! There's no way either that that little shove would have caused a grown man to fall to the ground but hey it's us who are the play actors remember. Doesn't happen in Brizzle. That similar tactics this season have blown up in his face is such a shame. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 17:57:00 by Paolo69 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55283
|
|
« Reply #629 on: Thursday, November 20, 2014, 17:40:11 » |
|
I don't think so. I've no history of shitting my pants, I find that hard to beleive. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
