Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Adver News: Wray set to act on 'cheat' slur  (Read 13017 times)
News Monkey

Offline Offline

Posts: 11830




« on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 07:00:09 »

Wray set to act on 'cheat' slur
           
           



  FORMER Swindon Town chairman Jeremy Wray has said he will consider “the best way to respond” after an article branding the club as “cheats” who committed “financial doping” under his stewardship was published in a national newspaper on Sunday.

           

http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/10173786.Wray_set_to_act_on__cheat__slur/?ref=rss
           
           
           
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #1 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 07:07:51 »

Do 'em Jezza
Logged
LittleRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 537




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 08:42:50 »

We love you jezza!
Logged
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....

Offline Offline

Posts: 6351


Fartmeister




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 08:58:07 »

If I am being a bit thick here, I'm sure somebody will correct me.

Why exactly is Jeremy Wray set to act on this? Does he still retain an official capacity at STFC? Surely we should expect something from the likes of Nick Watkins rather than Wray? Or as I as ill-informed as that troll from Oxford last night?

Be gentle....
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 08:59:34 »

If I am being a bit thick here, I'm sure somebody will correct me.

Why exactly is Jeremy Wray set to act on this? Does he still retain an official capacity at STFC? Surely we should expect something from the likes of Nick Watkins rather than Wray? Or as I as ill-informed as that troll from Oxford last night?

Be gentle....

The guy named him specifically.
Logged
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....

Offline Offline

Posts: 6351


Fartmeister




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 09:03:43 »

And so he did.....doh! Thanks.

Go Jezza!!!!!!!!
Logged
LittleRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 537




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 10:10:39 »

I thought he did have a stake all be it a much smaller one than black. Fitton also has a small stake.  I'm sure black wanted both to write off some of it or convert it to shares. Plus the guy loves STFC.
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #7 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 10:25:08 »

Can we sue the daily mail and the sun as well why we're at it? I hate those cunts.
Logged
ghanimah

Offline Offline

Posts: 3639





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 10:27:07 »

Talking of apologies

http://www.mirror.co.uk/for-the-record/sir-roger-moore--an-apology-1545092
Logged

"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
BenTheRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 201




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 10:57:53 »

I thought he did have a stake all be it a much smaller one than black. Fitton also has a small stake.  I'm sure black wanted both to write off some of it or convert it to shares. Plus the guy loves STFC.

Their stake must be pretty small if Black owns 98%
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 11:15:05 »

Their stake must be pretty small if Black owns 98%
It is but it makes no difference to the fact that Wray personally was directly libelled in that article. Hope he and the club take them to the fucking cleaners.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 16:59:22 »

 It might be worth treating this subject as sub judice now....whilst the legal people look at the FLP and scum site.
Logged
ghanimah

Offline Offline

Posts: 3639





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 17:11:10 »

It is but it makes no difference to the fact that Wray personally was directly libelled in that article. Hope he and the club take them to the fucking cleaners.

Seconded...
Logged

"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55590





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 17:33:46 »

It might be worth treating this subject as sub judice now....whilst the legal people look at the FLP and scum site.

Its not sub judice until a trial date is set is it?

I think a full retraction and apology is more likely anyway.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Monday, January 21, 2013, 17:38:34 »

Its not sub judice until a trial date is set is it?

I think a full retraction and apology is more likely anyway.

Well I'm not taking the chance...lawyers are right up there in the cunt stakes with bankers, politicians, and journalists.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: