Nemo
Shit Bacon
 Offline
Posts: 21442
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 19:09:02 » |
|
Thats not exactly true is it? Most of fans in the ground have cheap season tickets. Some games there must have been less than 300 people paying the full £25 figure.
Multiplying it by 15 still makes a fuckton of money. I take your point, but I'm fairly sure there have never been less than a thousand, we sold just short of 5000 Season tickets right? Average attendance must be a fair bit over 7k now? Pulling those figures out of my arse completely but would be surprised if I was far out. And Ghani, the wage cap is a % of your turnover. Our turnover is much higher, so in one sense we are. Still, plenty of teams have spent the money and fucked it up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #91 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 19:13:35 » |
|
The wage cap is 55% of your turnover. As you say Nemo that would mean that because our turnover is a lot higher than other teams our wage budget is a lot higher than pretty much all the teams in this league. When people go on about us spending so much money on wages I don't get it really because it's not exactly our fault we get more revenue that most teams in this league do.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #92 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 19:22:55 » |
|
We've got around 4.5k ST holders, and average attendance is just under 8k, which mean we've still have had an average paying on the day, of 3.5k...which is still bigger than watch Crawley !!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12537
|
|
« Reply #93 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 21:40:39 » |
|
4900 season ticket holders, average attendance 7900ish. Good guess Nemo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14534
|
|
« Reply #94 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 21:42:55 » |
|
The wage cap is 55% of your turnover. As you say Nemo that would mean that because our turnover is a lot higher than other teams our wage budget is a lot higher than pretty much all the teams in this league. When people go on about us spending so much money on wages I don't get it really because it's not exactly our fault we get more revenue that most teams in this league do.
Is it not 65%? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #95 on: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 21:45:40 » |
|
Is it not 65%?
60% this season and 55% next |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
gingernuggets
Offline
Posts: 369
|
|
« Reply #96 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 19:10:37 » |
|
Fat Cunt's into 1/4 to be the next Rotherham boss with skybet. Seems a strange one to me, especially now that they've picked up their form again and have a good chance of automatic promotion.
If he does go, how much of everyone's hatred of Crawley would he take with him? 80%? More or less?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #97 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 19:14:04 » |
|
I'd feel sorry for Rotherham. Andy Scott and then Steve Evans. Both horrible cunts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #98 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 19:17:06 » |
|
Can't see that happening. Why would he go there ??
Do Rotherham have money to spend next season ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #99 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 19:19:40 » |
|
They've got a new stadium back in Rotherham. Only has a capacity in the region of 10k though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14189
|
|
« Reply #100 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 19:28:18 » |
|
Lee Clark is 7/2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 55479
|
|
« Reply #101 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 20:06:37 » |
|
Can't see that happening. Why would he go there ??
Pissed off at having his strike force sold from behind his back? Knows Crawley are going to be screwed financially soon? Wants to escape being owned by PDC next year should Crawley go up? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14534
|
|
« Reply #102 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 21:25:12 » |
|
They've got a new stadium back in Rotherham. Only has a capacity in the region of 10k though.
...as opposed to Crawley's of 4,996. Perhaps to go along with the new stadium someone's put a bit of money in? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #103 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 21:40:03 » |
|
If you were a Rotherham fan would you be happy with a new stadium with a 10,000 capacity.
What sort of message is the club sending the fans as to its ambition?
So when the CG is eventually redeveloped, what sort of realistic capacity would be about right - 25,000?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14534
|
|
« Reply #104 on: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 21:49:51 » |
|
If you were a Rotherham fan would you be happy with a new stadium with a 10,000 capacity.
What sort of message is the club sending the fans as to its ambition?
So when the CG is eventually redeveloped, what sort of realistic capacity would be about right - 25,000?
Agreed. With a 10k stadium you're basically saying that you don't really think you'll ever go higher than L1. And yes, I would like to see a redeveloped CG with a capacity of about 25,000. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
