Pages: 1 ... 879 880 881 [882] 883 884 885 ... 1972   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: trivial things that make you smile,or make you feel good  (Read 5219675 times)
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 19151


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #13215 on: Tuesday, July 1, 2014, 22:48:37 »

Watching USA Belgium. Fantastic game, I'm not a wannabe yank, but I want them to win so badly.

Made a schoolboy error by forgetting that I paused it earlier and then reading twitter which told me the result!

But bloody hell America played well with passion, why the hell don't England play like that!
Logged
4D
That was definately my last game, honest

Online Online

Posts: 23514


I can't bear it 🙄




Ignore
« Reply #13216 on: Tuesday, July 1, 2014, 23:27:48 »

Same goes for Algeria,  all credit to them.
Logged
fatbasher

« Reply #13217 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:08:55 »

Made a schoolboy error by forgetting that I paused it earlier and then reading twitter which told me the result!

But bloody hell America played well with passion, why the hell don't England play like that!

Good point.
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
Re:
« Reply #13218 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:14:05 »

If England appointed Klinsmann and loaded the team with German born and based players, how would people feel?
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #13219 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:27:26 »

People are so hungry for success these days that they probably wouldn't care.  Which is a shame.

Also how would people react to doing a US, playing well and getting knocked out to Belgium in Round 2. I expect the press would go mental.
Logged
Matchworn Shirts
For Sale

Offline Offline

Posts: 7422




Ignore
« Reply #13220 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:27:49 »

If England appointed Klinsmann and loaded the team with German born and based players, how would people feel?

every national team is full of foreigners, doubt it would make much difference
Logged
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16467





Ignore
« Reply #13221 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:33:26 »

United States - technically poor, tactically naive, aim to get by on superior physicality.

England - technically poor, tactically naive, aim to get by on superior physicality.

The way the states played was very impressive, it was a great game and I was urging them to get an equaliser. But this constants claim that England have something to learn from them is a bit over the top.
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33889


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #13222 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 06:52:40 »

United States - technically poor, tactically naive, aim to get by on superior physicality.

England - technically poor, tactically naive, aim to get by on superior physicality.

The way the states played was very impressive, it was a great game and I was urging them to get an equaliser. But this constants claim that England have something to learn from them is a bit over the top.

Since when do England aim to get by on superior physicality?

We try to get by on good passing, attacking football - which our players aren't good enough to do. Thats why we are shit.

I'd also argue playing with pride and passion is entirely different to getting by on superior physicality plus it doesn't matter how you win football matches as long as you bloody win them!
Logged
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers

Offline Offline

Posts: 29815





Ignore
« Reply #13223 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 08:41:56 »

I've never heard of him, but I'd swap Michael Bradley for anyone in the England midfield. What a shift that guy put in, incredible.
Logged

we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #13224 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 08:45:45 »

Since when do England aim to get by on superior physicality?

We try to get by on good passing, attacking football - which our players aren't good enough to do. Thats why we are shit.

I'd also argue playing with pride and passion is entirely different to getting by on superior physicality plus it doesn't matter how you win football matches as long as you bloody win them!

It's always been a strand running through the heart of English football, that it's all very well for Johnny Foreigner to have all this fancy technique, but they would inevitably bow down to English/British muck and nettles.

When I think back to say the period from roughly 1977, through to about 1985 (Heysel), you get the classic picture.  English club sides, winning the European Cup every year, with a mixture of defensive hard men, often Sweatie, midfield enforcers and a big bloke like Peter  Withe up front.  You'd watch the occasional game shown on TV, and the constant mantra was Johnny Foreigner, good technique, but lacking bottle and physicality, so English/British would prevail. Another constant....goalkeepers who flap, don't catch just punch the ball, not a patch on our fine custodians in the footsteps of Gordon Banks....some of them being such wimps they wear gloves, unlike Gordon.  (SWeatie keepers excepted)

The zenith of this phenomenon, was probably Norn Ireland, beating Spain in Sevilla in the 82 WC, courtesy of a front 2 of Billy Hamilton and Gerry Armstrong.

Of  course Heysel put and end to English team entry into European club football, and so Europe and trends in the game, became even more remote for some years. Italia 90, put a sticking plaster on things for a bit, but what did the FA do, appoint Graham Taylor that's what....

Now we've got the situation whereby there is at least a realisation that we've been left behind, but there still is a belief that Johnny Foreigner, wont like it if we have some athletes who can run quickly at their ageing midfielders or statuesque defenders....see Sturridge/Sterling; Pirlo and Godin
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #13225 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 09:56:13 »

What made me sit up and take notice of Johnny Foreigner was when Ajax - whom nobody had ever heard at the time - absolutely stuffed Liverpool 5-0 in the Fairs Cup in the early 70s .

So this debate of, essentially, brain versus brawn, has been going on for ages.

Somehow Team England have almost been forced to try and adopt a continental way of playing even though it obviously doesn't suit them.

So we end falling between 2 stools and playing absolute crap
Logged
Cookie

Offline Offline

Posts: 1263




Ignore
Re:
« Reply #13226 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 10:49:05 »

England are shite because we're easy to beat due to the defence being gash. USA are average but are very difficult to beat and Belgium aren't all that anyway
Logged
bigbobjoylove

Offline Offline

Posts: 4198





Ignore
« Reply #13227 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 15:17:01 »

FIFA banning any sort of tackling has removed England's traditional best asset. You can't even go up for headers vs flappy foreign keepers anymore either as the ref will just blow up.
Logged
4D
That was definately my last game, honest

Online Online

Posts: 23514


I can't bear it 🙄




Ignore
« Reply #13228 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 15:44:26 »

One thing that has stood out for me in this world cup is the look of agony shown by anyone fouled - even with minimal contact. Has this replaced diving? 
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #13229 on: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 16:00:25 »

What made me sit up and take notice of Johnny Foreigner was when Ajax - whom nobody had ever heard at the time - absolutely stuffed Liverpool 5-0 in the Fairs Cup in the early 70s .

So this debate of, essentially, brain versus brawn, has been going on for ages.

Somehow Team England have almost been forced to try and adopt a continental way of playing even though it obviously doesn't suit them.

So we end falling between 2 stools and playing absolute crap

Of course, there have been coaches in English football, who've been a bit like lost prophets, men who wanted to see possession based football, but had to go elsewhere to develop their ideas, so firstly ex Town man Jimmy Hogan, who played in the SL before the Great War, when Town were noted for sexy football, to such an extent that we travelled to Argentina to help spread the game.

Hogan, ended up in Austria as a result of the Great War and his coaching developed the Austrian Wunderteam of the 30's, unfortunately, WWII and the Anschluss, put paid to them, although the Hun nicked a lot of ideas.

Another, was Vic Buckingham, who coached in England, but had to leave under a cloud, although nothing was proved against him, in wake of the Sheff Wednesday match fixing stuff of 63 ish, in which ex Town man Bronco Layne was busted.

Buckingham went to Holland and helped  develop Total Football, where he found such adherents as Ernst Happel, along with players like Johan Cruyff.

Happel, had come through the Austrian system, and took the Dutch to the 78 WC final.

Instinctively, the English just don't like possession football, a fact for which there was plenty of evidence on here last season, with TEFers slagging off the Power/Cooper template.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 879 880 881 [882] 883 884 885 ... 1972   Go Up
Print
Jump to: