Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 12   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Is Fitton Incompetent?  (Read 19915 times)
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #60 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:06:25 »

" but the more well written responses, many of which you've seemed to ignored,"

Ben, I apologise if I have not responded to specific points; I assure you it was not intentional.

Which particular arguments do you think I should answer ?(sorry I can't really be bothered to trawl back through all the posts).

If you're not going to join in the debate then don't fucking bother starting the thread. Jesus.
Logged
gasha1

Offline Offline

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #61 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:08:33 »

"You ask for serious debate but you start by dismissing what Fitton has done with 'blah blah blah'. "

Sorry if this statement was misleading. What I meant by that was that what Fitton has achieved off the field is without question.

I was trying to say lets keep the debate to football related decisions, which a lot of people seem to think have been less than stellar, and not just the MM appointment.

Logged
Arch Stanton

Offline Offline

Posts: 1306


Wallowing in negativity




Ignore
« Reply #62 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:10:40 »

"You ask for serious debate but you start by dismissing what Fitton has done with 'blah blah blah'. "

Sorry if this statement was misleading. What I meant by that was that what Fitton has achieved off the field is without question.

I was trying to say lets keep the debate to football related decisions, which a lot of people seem to think have been less than stellar, and not just the MM appointment.



For example? (apart from MM appointment and the taking forever to appoint someone else)
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #63 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:12:14 »

" but the more well written responses, many of which you've seemed to ignored,"

Ben, I apologise if I have not responded to specific points; I assure you it was not intentional.

Which particular arguments do you think I should answer ?(sorry I can't really be bothered to trawl back through all the posts).

I'm just saying that for the first 3 pages you seem to ignore all the nice well written posts for the (maybe less well written) abuse you got. You can't blame people much either, you haven't exactly put yourself across well. As axs just pointed out, you didn't start well with the blah blah blah. That blah blah blah is pretty crucial.

We've all written our big lovely long pieces on how we see the new board, and between them they've more than answered your questions. How about you take the time to write a proper post to back up your apparently negative perceptions of the new board?

 

That would probably be the best way to convince me that you've got a real point to make.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #64 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:12:52 »

I'll lock the thread for an hour if you're worried about it moving on?
Logged
gasha1

Offline Offline

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #65 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:13:23 »

axs,

thank you for your contribution.

I would be surprised if anyone seriously considered that having started the thread, that I haven't adequately contributed. If you feel otherwise, then that is unfortunate.

Personally I think this thread has been a fascinating barometer of current thinking on our situation, a worthwhile exercise in my view.
Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #66 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:14:26 »

You're welcome.
Logged
gasha1

Offline Offline

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #67 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:16:14 »

"I'm just saying that for the first 3 pages you seem to ignore all the nice well written posts "

Which ones would you like me to reply to? Happy to oblige.
Logged
Arch Stanton

Offline Offline

Posts: 1306


Wallowing in negativity




Ignore
« Reply #68 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:17:21 »

"I'm just saying that for the first 3 pages you seem to ignore all the nice well written posts "

Which ones would you like me to reply to? Happy to oblige.

My last one?

'cos I'm struggling to think of any.... Wink
Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #69 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:19:33 »

Reg's, Samdy's.
Logged
gasha1

Offline Offline

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #70 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:21:52 »

"That would probably be the best way to convince me that you've got a real point to make."

I don't really have a point to make other than that, like everyone else, I want the absolute best for the football club.

I was interested to know if everyone still has 100% belief in this board or whether any doubts are creeping in.

Do please remember, that the owners of any organisation must still maintain a level of accountability. I suppose if I do have a point, that would be it, but I'm sure you would agree.

Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #71 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:23:35 »

Absolutely. I don't think anyone has or would argue otherwise.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #72 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:26:03 »

"I'm just saying that for the first 3 pages you seem to ignore all the nice well written posts "

Which ones would you like me to reply to? Happy to oblige.

You just ignored my invitation to make the effort to back up your own views. There's been lots of posts which have taken more effort to write out, with backed up opinions of Fitton's job so far, than your two dozen or so posts in this thread put together.

Are you not willing to back up your own opinion of the new boards efforts in the same way?
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #73 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:28:53 »

"That would probably be the best way to convince me that you've got a real point to make."

I don't really have a point to make other than that, like everyone else, I want the absolute best for the football club.

I was interested to know if everyone still has 100% belief in this board or whether any doubts are creeping in.

Do please remember, that the owners of any organisation must still maintain a level of accountability. I suppose if I do have a point, that would be it, but I'm sure you would agree.



Of course, there's has to be a level of accountability, but do you not think that the well thought out posts throughout this thread show that it's something that we've all thinking about?

Just because the majority of people think the new board are doing a good job, doesn't mean that people are blindly accepting that they are.

Logged
gasha1

Offline Offline

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #74 on: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:30:10 »

"Of course, there's has to be a level of accountability, but do you not think that the well thought out posts throughout this thread show that it's something that we've all thinking about?

Just because the majority of people think the new board are doing a good job, doesn't mean that people are blindly accepting that they are."

I accept that point.


Ben, you should try starting a "controversial" thread and try responding to every single posting. I can assure you its
not easy.

« Last Edit: Monday, December 22, 2008, 23:31:45 by gasha1 » Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 12   Go Up
Print
Jump to: