Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Record number of strikers?  (Read 6034 times)
normy

Offline Offline

Posts: 990





Ignore
« on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:02:00 »

Crikey!  Cox, Paynter, Corr, Sturrock, Ashikodi. Strikers!
Arguably, all of these capable of doing some sort of job at least, in this Division. And all signed, not loaned.
Is this a record? Please comment.   Smiley
Logged

ust be the oldest
flammableBen

« Reply #1 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:03:14 »

We might have to put some of them down. Or start playing 5 up front. Both acceptable options.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:03:40 »

Ashikodi is a loan........................................
Logged

It's All Good..............
neville w

« Reply #3 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:13:12 »

Quote from: "herthab"
Ashikodi is a loan........................................


No, there are five of them, please try to keep up (Unless we''ve signed Crikey as well) Wink
Logged
normy

Offline Offline

Posts: 990





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:14:11 »

Oh yes, sorry.
Logged

ust be the oldest
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 17:37:11 »

I would offer 66/67 as being a vintage season for strikers....we could pick from Dennis (Bullets ) Brown, Keith East, Ken Skeen, Jimmy Lawton and the great Pat Terry.

  Between them this lot scored 607 career league goals.....Skeen was a Trowbridge boy who had his finest moment scoring v West Ham in our 3-1 win at the CG, a match whose highlights were shown on Sportsnight with Coleman.  However he was the least productive of the quintet and was shipped out to the Scum, where he netted a modest  28 goals in 214 games.

 That season we scored 81 goals in the league....have we scored more since Tails?
Logged
normy

Offline Offline

Posts: 990





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:05:33 »

Yes Reg, vintage. But that season Skeen was a winger, and scored only once. The four strikers Terry, Lawton, East, and Bullets got 29 between them, but Rogers got 32. I knew Keith East slightly, through some mates. He was a bit of a lad, I believe.
Logged

ust be the oldest
sonic youth

« Reply #7 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:09:30 »

82 goals in 85/86 reg.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:21:12 »

Quote from: "normy"
Yes Reg, vintage. But that season Skeen was a winger, and scored only once. The four strikers Terry, Lawton, East, and Bullets got 29 between them, but Rogers got 32. I knew Keith East slightly, through some mates. He was a bit of a lad, I believe.


 Nah....Skeen was definitely a striker...he didn't score a league goal, that season.  As regards winger we could call on Don, Eric Weaver, Bruce Walker or Bobby Jones.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:24:59 »

Quote from: "sonic youth"
82 goals in 85/86 reg.


 That season was about Colin Gordon, Brian (The badger) Wade, then later Bambi, who played wide, but could play up top.  Charlie Henry was leading scorer playing in midfield.
Logged
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Offline Offline

Posts: 15073



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:29:20 »

We should play the classic 2-3-5 formation like they used to do until some point in the (I'm guessing) early60's.

How about (using the proper numbering system)
                               
                                 1. Brezovan
                                Full Backs
             2. Commmingues (Right Back)               3. Vincent(Left Back)
                                       
                                Half Backs
          4. Easton (Right Half)            5. Peacock(Centre Half)          6. McNamee  (Left Half)
                               
                                  Forwards
   7. Ashikobi (Outside Right) 8.Sturrock (Inside Right)  9.Corr (Centre Forward)               10. Paynter (Inside Left)   11. Cox (Outside Left)

It would be worth a goal start playing that formation, just for the shock value! What I would pay a lot of money to see is a team playing a 1-2-7 formation which is what I seem to remember reading somewhere, is the formation The Wanderers played against The Royal Engineers in the first FA Cup Final in 1872.

Marvellous, Mr Chumley Warner!
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:35:27 »

Quote from: "OOH!  SHAUN TAYLOR"
We should play the classic 2-3-5 formation like they used to do until some point in the (I'm guessing) early60's.

How about (using the proper numbering system)
                               
                                 1. Brezovan
                                Full Backs
             2. Commmingues (Right Back)               3. Vincent(Left Back)
                                       
                                Half Backs
          4. Easton (Right Half)            5. Peacock(Centre Half)          6. McNamee  (Left Half)
                               
                                  Forwards
   7. Ashikobi (Outside Right) 8.Sturrock (Inside Right)  9.Corr (Centre Forward)               10. Paynter (Inside Left)   11. Cox (Outside Left)

It would be worth a goal start playing that formation, just for the shock value! What I would pay a lot of money to see is a team playing a 1-2-7 formation which is what I seem to remember reading somewhere, is the formation The Wanderers played against The Royal Engineers in the first FA Cup Final in 1872.

Marvellous, Mr Chumley Warner!


 There's a place in Cheshire called Cholmondeley (prononced Chumley) its near Malpas.

  I've always assumed its how Mr CW spelt his name.
Logged
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Offline Offline

Posts: 15073



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:41:17 »

You're probably right Reg. I have to confess, I did not bother to check my spelling there Oops
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:47:04 »

Quote from: "OOH!  SHAUN TAYLOR"
You're probably right Reg. I have to confess, I did not bother to check my spelling there Oops


 Not necessarily.....don't suppose many know of Cholmondeley (Chumley), its got a castle, and I used to do a fair bit of walking rouind there...Peckforton Hills.
Logged
yeo

Offline Offline

Posts: 3651





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Friday, February 1, 2008, 18:51:54 »

Where did it all go wrong Sad
Logged

/
W56196272
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: