Pages: 1 ... 3182 3183 3184 [3185] 3186 3187 3188 ... 3981   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: STFC Transfer Rumours  (Read 9086894 times)
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19419


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #47760 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 11:52:21 »

Maguire would be on a par with us signing Wanker John McGinley (back in the day).
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11739




Ignore
« Reply #47761 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:10:06 »

Other than the level he has played at, hasn't Wickham largely played (when fit) in wide positions due to his work rate and versatility?
Logged
singingiiiffy

Offline Offline

Posts: 2845





Ignore
« Reply #47762 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:14:35 »

the last piece to this jigsaw. I feel like Wickham is too much of a risk purely on fitness not ability. saying that if injured we have that flexibility of reacting with loans this season
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32333


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #47763 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:18:43 »

I’d say Wickham would be risky based on the fact he’s shite and doesn’t score goals.

Like I can’t believe some wanted nothing to do with Davison but would take this guy?
Logged
Pookemon

Offline Offline

Posts: 727





Ignore
« Reply #47764 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:27:15 »

Other than the level he has played at, hasn't Wickham largely played (when fit) in wide positions due to his work rate and versatility?

Obviously can't verify that 100% but transfermarket have him down as playing almost entirely centre forward in 2019 when he was playing at a level that recorded that stuff.   Scored 3 goals in over 1100 minutes played, which sounds shit but is about 1 in 4ish

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/connor-wickham/leistungsdaten/spieler/95435/plus/1?saison=2019

Injured a lot since then but still says CF nearly everytime a position is mentioned.
« Last Edit: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:30:05 by Pookemon » Logged
molepar

Offline Offline

Posts: 1024





Ignore
« Reply #47765 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 12:29:51 »

I’d say Wickham would be risky based on the fact he’s shite and doesn’t score goals.

Like I can’t believe some wanted nothing to do with Davison but would take this guy?
Agreed. I’d rather see us take a punt on a non league striker with a good goal scoring record. Wick ham is an overrated journeyman with a big wage and a poor record in front of goal.
Logged
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19419


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #47766 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 14:17:36 »

Presume this should go here.

Sandro is doing a phone in tomorrow evening.

Logged
Honkytonk

Offline Offline

Posts: 4413


Whoo Whoo!




Ignore
« Reply #47767 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 16:23:12 »

Wickham was shit every time I picked him up in football manager.

One season he got his pants in such a twist I sent him on loan to supermarine as punishment and let him go for 1k after signing him on a free.

Fuck that.

Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12534




« Reply #47768 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 16:25:31 »

Wickham was shit every time I picked him up in football manager.

Based solely on this, he can get to fuck.
Logged
Mr Stevens

Offline Offline

Posts: 382




Ignore
« Reply #47769 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 18:08:48 »

I always liked Wickham as a player but didn't realise his scoring record was so bad. Saw him score at the Etihad but can't remember if it was for Palace or Sunderland. Given the wages that would be involved, Simpson would be the better bet.
Logged

Take your chips and fuck off home.
Legends-Lounge

Offline Offline

Posts: 8297

Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this




Ignore
« Reply #47770 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 18:46:48 »

I always liked Wickham as a player but didn't realise his scoring record was so bad. Saw him score at the Etihad but can't remember if it was for Palace or Sunderland. Given the wages that would be involved, Simpson would be the better bet.

Simpson comes with a transfer fee. I have no idea who this Wickham bloke is but going by our current transfer spend I cannot see us going for what in essence would look like a geriatric, has been journeyman crock. Especially as has been mentioned his wages are going to be something that would possibily destabilise the other players.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32333


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #47771 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 19:49:06 »

Why do we think a striker who doesn’t score goals is going to demand a massive wage?
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11739




Ignore
« Reply #47772 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 19:59:20 »

Why do we think a striker who doesn’t score goals is going to demand a massive wage?

Because he has generally been employed on Premier League/Championship wages until 2021.  I doubt he'd have taken a drop down to our budget levels even at Franchise for a season.  Palace paid anything from 7m to 10m for him 7 years ago, I doubt that came with a low wage contract (a contract he was on until 2021).  He may be shit, but he won't be cheap.
Logged
mrverve

Offline Offline

Posts: 1429





Ignore
« Reply #47773 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 20:04:40 »

There's a big difference playing (not always up front) and not scoring regularly at PL and Championship level to being shit at this level.

League 2 is garbage, Wickham would be better Davison.
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 25119





Ignore
« Reply #47774 on: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 20:17:07 »

60k a week in 2019

https://www.spotrac.com/epl/crystal-palace/payroll/2019/
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3182 3183 3184 [3185] 3186 3187 3188 ... 3981   Go Up
Print
Jump to: