4D
Or not 4D that is the question
 Offline
Posts: 21948
I can't bear it 🙄
|
 |
« Reply #105 on: Friday, September 20, 2013, 21:22:51 » |
|
Fuck a duck, I know it's bad, but smoking area! Whooo hoo. That is brilliant. I don't smoke in the ground, but also i'm in at 2.59 and out 1 min after full time, so that works for both me and the club.
You obviously don't sit in the Drs if you are out in 1 min |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #106 on: Friday, September 20, 2013, 21:34:04 » |
|
I swap stands but if I'm in the drs it's normally a swan dive over the side and i'm lighting up as I spin.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
4D
Or not 4D that is the question
Offline
Posts: 21948
I can't bear it 🙄
|
|
« Reply #107 on: Friday, September 20, 2013, 22:24:58 » |
|
Sitting in row Y I use to shut the gate on the way out
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #108 on: Saturday, September 21, 2013, 00:17:48 » |
|
On the subject of noise I hope the South Stand makes some effort tomorrow. The Arkells has been a lost cause for years but the SS was decent last couple of seasons. Turned into the Arkells this season though.
Nazi |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
 Online
Posts: 1738
|
|
« Reply #109 on: Saturday, September 21, 2013, 15:10:58 » |
|
Floodlights have been repaired.
Have they my arse! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16354
|
|
« Reply #110 on: Saturday, September 21, 2013, 16:34:59 » |
|
I don't know about Bars. They need to change the billboard on the back of the town end.
The one with Ferry, Ritchie and Devera.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
fatbasher
|
|
« Reply #111 on: Tuesday, September 24, 2013, 21:27:51 » |
|
According to the bloke sat next to me, the club have planning permission to put a roof over the bank....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #112 on: Tuesday, September 24, 2013, 21:37:26 » |
|
Wasn't a fisherman was he?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6146
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #113 on: Tuesday, September 24, 2013, 21:51:05 » |
|
According to the bloke sat next to me, the club have planning permission to put a roof over the bank....
Oh no they haven't! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbasher
|
|
« Reply #114 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 06:18:04 » |
|
Don Rogers seems to think so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #115 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 07:50:25 » |
|
Ooh you tease.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 18728
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #116 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 07:55:02 » |
|
The only application relating to the bank since 1990 is for the new stand in 93 which is still on the Councils books as never determined or withdrawn?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #117 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 08:22:15 » |
|
Do we really need to go over this again? Clearly the board have some kind of plan to submit an application for a roof on the Bank in process (which they regard as "have submitted a planning application"), but as yet, it's not yet reached the stage of having been formally lodged with the council in a way the council themselves would regard as a formal planning application. Probably at some intermediate stage of being discussed with council officers so it can be properly shaped when it is formally submitted.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dalumpimunki
Offline
Posts: 1075
|
|
« Reply #118 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 08:32:19 » |
|
Is this whole "they're lying to us" debate based on that single statement made at the business plan meeting that a roof for the Bank was "in planning".
If so that statement is open to a number of interpretations isn't it? From "we're thinking through the numbers internally", through "we're working with architects on the design" to "we've submitted a formal planning application to the council".
I've been assuming that a few people, who at the time were looking for any reason to suggest that the board were trying to pull the wool over our eyes about everything, chose to interpret it as the latter so that they could point and yell "liars".
Is there more to it than that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
..never go back.
|
|
|
luckyluke699
Offline
Posts: 614
5 league goals and counting...
|
|
« Reply #119 on: Wednesday, September 25, 2013, 08:37:41 » |
|
I've been assuming that a few people, who at the time were looking for any reason to suggest that the board were trying to pull the wool over our eyes about everything, chose to interpret it as the latter so that they could point and yell "liars".
Agree. When Jed & Co took over everyone (myself included) thought they were a complete bunch of cowboys. It's taken time but that image is slowly being eroded away by (Jeds twitter and fan interaction aside) on the whole some very professional conduct based around sound financial planning within the club. Aren't we passed this stage now of presumptuous criticism? Let's see what happens and judge after eh?! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
