Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Here come the cuts  (Read 6827 times)
Summerof69

Offline Offline

Posts: 8598





Ignore
« Reply #45 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 12:56:43 »

As for Labour "pissing away" all that money: nice new hospital you've got there in Swindon.

Paid for by PFI money, which we're still going to be paying for,for the next 20 years, and smaller than the one it replaced, despite the population increasing substancially.
Logged

BAZINGA !!

Join the Red Army Fund and donate at www.redarmyfund.co.uk

Join the Football Supporters Federation for FREE at www.fsf.org.uk/join.php
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 12:58:06 »

"The papers keep writing that [my wife, Samantha] comes from a very blue-blooded background", but "she is actually very unconventional. She went to a day school."

Jesus fucking Wept
Logged
thepeoplesgame

Offline Offline

Posts: 666




Ignore
« Reply #47 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 13:14:53 »

Paid for by PFI money, which we're still going to be paying for,for the next 20 years, and smaller than the one it replaced, despite the population increasing substancially.

You'd rather have kept the old one then? Fair enough.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #48 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 13:22:54 »

It's rare that I agree with SummerOf69 on these things but he's right about PFI. Fucking stupid way of doing these things. Personally I'd rather they sort out the cleaning, old or new hospital. Ever since the Tories decided outsourcing was the way forward, you've got a better chance of coming out worse than you went in
Logged
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 14:22:43 »

You'd rather have kept the old one then? Fair enough.

Here's a good article that explains what the problem is with the majority of the new hospitals that Labour built....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1532511/PFI-hospitals-will-cost-an-extra-45bn-for-30-years.html

Some examples from the article....

- A Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust hospital cost £10 million to build, by the time the PFI payments are complete it will have cost £113 million.
- A South Manchester University Trust hospital cost £67 million to build, by the time the PFI payments are complete it will have cost £974 million.
Logged
thepeoplesgame

Offline Offline

Posts: 666




Ignore
« Reply #50 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 14:43:27 »

Here's a good article that explains what the problem is with the majority of the new hospitals that Labour built....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1532511/PFI-hospitals-will-cost-an-extra-45bn-for-30-years.html

Some examples from the article....

- A Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust hospital cost £10 million to build, by the time the PFI payments are complete it will have cost £113 million.
- A South Manchester University Trust hospital cost £67 million to build, by the time the PFI payments are complete it will have cost £974 million.

It ain't perfect by any stretch, but at least they fucking tried.

Unfortunately orthodox thinking in this country has decided that nothing is worth doing unless someone can make money out of it. How, in that climate, do you get NHS hospitals and state schools built? You either fight the business interests and rich elite who propagate this myth and change orthodox thinking (I wish they had at least tried) or you give some cunt the opportunity to make a fortune out of it.
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11626


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #51 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 14:44:25 »

PFI deals were Gordon's Brown's very own pet project...an accounting wheeze designed to take capital spending off the government's books.  It was and is a deception.

The PFI deal that the London Underground is now saddled with is as serious.  Horrifically complicated and ridiculously expensive...the real winners were the law firms employed to draw up the agreements.  When Metronet, one of the 'PFI partners' finally went bust a few years ago, the tax payer was left to pick up the tab.  You couldn't make it up.
Logged
Spy

Offline Offline

Posts: 2483





Ignore
« Reply #52 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 19:43:40 »

The government are aiming to reduce Jay-Z's problems to 75 by 2015.
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #53 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 19:59:00 »

PFI deals were Gordon's Brown's very own pet project...an accounting wheeze designed to take capital spending off the government's books.  It was and is a deception.

The PFI deal that the London Underground is now saddled with is as serious.  Horrifically complicated and ridiculously expensive...the real winners were the law firms employed to draw up the agreements.  When Metronet, one of the 'PFI partners' finally went bust a few years ago, the tax payer was left to pick up the tab.  You couldn't make it up.

Exactly the same scenario in a lot of the PFI schools. There are some that I've worked on that are very close to going under, and they've still got 23 of the 25 year contract to run. As for the lawyers they are basically the only people that have made money out of the BSF project also. The whole project has taken a lot of flak for the length of time and the cost to get schools up and running. But guess where most of the hold ups were and still are caused by?
Logged
Lumps

« Reply #54 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 20:50:47 »

No. It's just not an opinion you like or that supports your views. We're all different. Roll Eyes

Yeah, some of us have the first idea about economics and some of us have swallowed and regurgitated the tired old shit that "running a country is the same as running a business" and don't seem to have grasped the concept that what might work for a supermarket chain might just not do the job for an entire economic system.

Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27183





Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 21:34:50 »

You know how to run a country do you Lumpy?
Logged
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #56 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 21:48:22 »

Yeah, some of us have the first idea about economics and some of us have swallowed and regurgitated the tired old shit that "running a country is the same as running a business" and don't seem to have grasped the concept that what might work for a supermarket chain might just not do the job for an entire economic system.

Though some businesses are bigger than entire countries. If Wal-Mart were a country they'd be about the #22 biggest by GDP and about 20 businesses would be in the top 50. Obviously there are major differences, but some governments could learn a lot from well run businesses like not over stretching by spending money you don't have.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36347




« Reply #57 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 21:49:51 »

If public organisations got themselves in order then the country wouldn't piss as much money away. Having been into colleges, NHS trusts and the such, often you get people making decisions or having a big part in running the show which don't have a clue. This is where the public sector could learn from the private sector.

The Government, their departments and organisations receiving funding don't necessarily need to be more stingy, they just need to be more accountable and business minded in their approaches. The correct ethos/mentality isn't their in a lot of cases. I have seen a few organisations which are really good at this and they get more far value out of their funding.

As to the budget, I have mixed feelings. On the one hand I think it's better to recover the defecit quicker, on the other I think it's disgusting things like ESA will be cut for many and this makes me angry.

Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 21:59:47 »

One question.......exactly who does the country owe these billions.........China?...or fukin Timbukto.

No guessing please.........and no nonsense about bonds.
Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27183





Ignore
« Reply #59 on: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 22:19:24 »

Bonds and gilts make up the largest proportion of national debt leefer.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
Print
Jump to: