Poll
Question: most disliked player?  (Voting closed: Sunday, April 23, 2006, 16:15:49)
gurney - 12 (19%)
roberts - 4 (6.3%)
nicholas - 5 (7.9%)
pook - 16 (25.4%)
evans - 1 (1.6%)
o'hanlon - 2 (3.2%)
j.smith - 6 (9.5%)
ifil - 9 (14.3%)
peacock - 1 (1.6%)
cureton - 1 (1.6%)
shakes - 1 (1.6%)
brown - 2 (3.2%)
CCP - 0 (0%)
whalley - 1 (1.6%)
jenkins - 2 (3.2%)
Total Voters: 38

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: most disliked player ?  (Read 10359 times)
stfc11

Offline Offline

Posts: 882





Ignore
« Reply #15 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 19:56:02 »

Pook, seems to think he's better than he is, and just watches the game when he's on the pitch!!
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #16 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 20:51:14 »

Quote from: "STFCere"
ROBERTS - i genuinely believe this guy is bleeding the club dry without a care in the world. probably one of our highest paid players with little given in return, yes hes had his problems blah blah blah but hes a waste of space + when he does come on hes a lazy shite
That's my vote
Logged
Sade

Offline Offline

Posts: 6427





Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 21:20:00 »

I used to hate ruddock.....does that count ?  :?
Logged

RED ARMY
Amir

« Reply #18 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 21:34:39 »

I'll go for Pook because he looks kind of happy while he's being shit.  I'd go for Shakes but to be fair to him he has a look on him like he doesn't know how he ended up as a footballer.
Logged
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants

Offline Offline

Posts: 8746




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 21:49:03 »

J.Smith is fucking useless.

why he still gets a starting place is beyond me
Logged

Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 22:04:02 »

technically the worst player is ifil by a country mile so he gets my vote.but i think roberts is a cunt
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 15985


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 22:31:29 »

Quote from: "arriba"
technically the worst player is ifil by a country mile so he gets my vote.but i think roberts is a cunt
Oh look the pisshead who thinks he is God's gift to football is "winning".

First time for everything
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 22:34:30 »

why quote me to say that
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10011


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 23:15:55 »

Quote from: "magicroundabout"
J.Smith is fucking useless.

why he still gets a starting place is beyond me


Smith was our best player on Saturday.
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9509





Ignore
« Reply #24 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 23:31:54 »

Quote from: "Tails"
Quote from: "magicroundabout"
J.Smith is fucking useless.

why he still gets a starting place is beyond me


Smith was our best player on Saturday.


no he wasn't
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Leggett
Do you like popsicles?

Offline Offline

Posts: 7651





Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 23:33:47 »

he really, really wasn't. continually out of position, totally fucking useless, crapcrapcrap.
Logged

PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid

Offline Offline

Posts: 1948





Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 23:41:37 »

Quote from: "Tails"
Quote from: "magicroundabout"
J.Smith is fucking useless.

why he still gets a starting place is beyond me


Smith was our best player on Saturday.


I thought that too. Made a few dartin runs down the left flank, which is good to see from a wing back and won us a few free kicks, which Gurney kindly blasted over the bar or at the wall....
Logged

Bassett Bulldogs FC - http://bassettbulldogsfc.co.uk/
Amir

« Reply #27 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 23:47:05 »

Considering how out of position Jack Smith was he had a reasonable game I thought.  He's looked out of position as wing-back as well yet he was made to play there.
Logged
alex

« Reply #28 on: Monday, April 17, 2006, 08:21:29 »

Judging on Saturday's performance, the whole squads clueless. I was originally quite concerned at the lack of new contracts being signed, but now I think its probably a saving grace that not many of these wasters have put pen to paper. Although Peacock looked impressive when he came on, the rest of them lacked desire, determination and probably most importantly, they lacked talent of any kind. Long ball after long ball hoofed up to Cureton, who is frankly just too small... he can't compete. The best thing that could happen now would be if none of the current players (apart from Peacock) signed new contracts, and then we could finally rebuild. I think Onoura's days are numbered. Fairly or not, he will be sacked at the end of the season.
Logged
FlashGordon

Offline Offline

Posts: 913




Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Monday, April 17, 2006, 08:58:00 »

:angry:  Again i'll have to defend gurney to the world as people slate him too easily.

He shows passion - not many of the others do?! Yes he's agressive...so what its good, crunching tackles are what we need and lack, he mouths off-yes prob one of his main problems, alongside the bookings - but id rather have him booked every other game for actually giving a toss!

His freekicks yes have gone downhill, has had his screemers but now should pass them on...BUT do you not think its Iffy who puts him on free kicks? They do train after all and then pick their set piece takers??

Long balls....yes can be off target but on sat his raking passes were finding our players 9 times out of 10...he is one of the only ones at the back who actually looks composed on the ball and can drive on...therefore i agree with whoever said more or less a team of gurney's n and then we would have some fighting ( Wink ) chance!

Personally we should play 442..and have gurns at right bk IMO his bst position.

as for worst player - Jack smith, pure wank.
Logged

Come on YOU REDS!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: