Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: people make up your minds part 2  (Read 13631 times)
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 19:09:55 »

I'm sure if you made a reasonable offer he'd be happy to sell....after all this is what happened with Brady.

   He bought some shares to get involved with the promise to buy out SSW, once his project got going....which of course it never did and once SSW saw the damage being done to the club, he used his shareholding to oust DD and IB.
Logged
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten

Offline Offline

Posts: 1475




Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 19:32:22 »

I was talking about a fans "consortium" of sorts reg.
Logged

Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose  and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.

Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
lumpimynci

« Reply #47 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 20:26:37 »

Quote from: "Ironside"
I was talking about a fans "consortium" of sorts reg.


This is the second time in as many days you've expressed some support for the idea of a community owned club.
 
You're starting to sound a bit bolshie for a brown shirt. I'd watch out for those long knives if I were you.

On a more serious note though, the first time was when you were supporting the only really serious proposal for change (Reg's) put forward on a thread on THISIS.

However, you'd spent the rest of the thread ranting along with the rest that the board were a bunch of shitbags and needed to get their wallets out.

Now there's a bit of a contradiction there. You either want some wealthy backer bunging a load of money into the club regularly to keep it going, and consequently acting as if he owns the club, BECAUSE HE DOES. Or you want to take your chances with the community getting of its arse, taking on the ownership and management, and doing something to save the club.

You can't have both.

As Reg, quite rightly as always, pointed out no-one, not even the tuppenny-happenny local businessmen like Hillier were prepared to put in any significant amounts without ownership and control, and the clubs rules were changed in order to facilitate that.

In my heart I'm with Reg. I'd love to see the club owned and controlled by a fans consortium. In my guts the idea scares the shit out of me. Partly because the fucking idiocy that is all too apparent on that Thisis thread makes me think these are not people that should be running a bath let alone a football club. But mainly because i think everybody underestimates just what a difficult job it is keeping a club above water in the lower leagues.

Admitedly fans only get clubs handed to them when things are really bad, but Bournemouth, Rotherham, Wrexham, they've hardly gone from strength to strength have they.

Rotherham are probably the closest equivalent to us, i don't think they own the ground either, and look where they are. No bugger breaks even on their football income, and like them we've no other assets, and no other serious income streams.

In our current state with the CVA pending i just don't think it's a goer I'm afraid.

Which leaves us with the current board, and the hope that the development goes through. (Because despite what the deluded what idiots on that other forum might think, there's no queue of people waiting to buy up the club and chuck money at it)

Incidentally on the subject of the development you made some statement that the board were only hanging around for that to happen and for them to get their money back.

Well Little Willie might have a hope of getting the £400k in loans that he put in back, but there's no fucking way it'll generate anything like what SSW's put in. And he know's it. He's just hoping it will stabilize the club enough for him to be able to turn off the drip feed of his own cash that it takes to keep it alive at the moment.
Logged
Dazzza

Offline Offline

Posts: 8265



WWW
« Reply #48 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 20:30:30 »

Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "Piemonte"
Cracking post Dazzza. I agree 100%


 I'd agree with most of that, but it should be pointed out that Wee Willie arrived on the scene as a director in 96/97..when there was the last share issue.

 This was when SSW hoovered up the excess shares and became by far the major shareholder ahead of the likes of Peter Godwin,

 BTW.....David Hempelman Adams also held 100,000 shares at the time the same as Carson.


Aye, but I don't think he was on the board during El Tel's regieme was he?

Don't suppose you have a list of the main shareholders handy do you Reg or even what the majority SSW holds?
Logged

Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:23:04 »

Its a bit tricky to track some of this stuff down....but at the time of the second CVA, SSW held 1.8 mill shares this represented 40% of the total.

 STPL held 21%

 James Wills 283,350 or 6.3%

 Wendy Godwin 398,934, roughly 9%

  Carson 100,000 or 2.2 %

 Then a couple of oddities Charles Adams and Robert Haville each holding about the same as Carson

 By 2003 the last set of accounts Wendy Godwin has none left Carson and James Wills the same and no mention of others not on the Board.

 Of course the Newbury lot have no shares at all.

  No idea what became of the STPL holding.
Logged
Asher

« Reply #50 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:28:49 »

Quote from: "paddy"
asher wrote:
and before anyone starts no we dont touch drugs such as coke etc as thats a mugs game.

don't make me laugh


I was trying to protect your habit paddy
Logged
paddy

« Reply #51 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:31:25 »

haha, good lad, i'm clean now anyway
Logged
Asher

« Reply #52 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:32:43 »

3 months!!!!
Logged
paddy

« Reply #53 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:35:20 »

good for me
Logged
Asher

« Reply #54 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:37:05 »

Bad for business  Sad
Logged
paddy

« Reply #55 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:42:10 »

yea your business
Logged
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten

Offline Offline

Posts: 1475




Ignore
« Reply #56 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:42:58 »

Quote from: "lumpimynci"
Quote from: "Ironside"
I was talking about a fans "consortium" of sorts reg.


This is the second time in as many days you've expressed some support for the idea of a community owned club.
 
You're starting to sound a bit bolshie for a brown shirt. I'd watch out for those long knives if I were you.

On a more serious note though, the first time was when you were supporting the only really serious proposal for change (Reg's) put forward on a thread on THISIS.

However, you'd spent the rest of the thread ranting along with the rest that the board were a bunch of shitbags and needed to get their wallets out.

Now there's a bit of a contradiction there. You either want some wealthy backer bunging a load of money into the club regularly to keep it going, and consequently acting as if he owns the club, BECAUSE HE DOES. Or you want to take your chances with the community getting of its arse, taking on the ownership and management, and doing something to save the club.

You can't have both.

As Reg, quite rightly as always, pointed out no-one, not even the tuppenny-happenny local businessmen like Hillier were prepared to put in any significant amounts without ownership and control, and the clubs rules were changed in order to facilitate that.

In my heart I'm with Reg. I'd love to see the club owned and controlled by a fans consortium. In my guts the idea scares the shit out of me. Partly because the fucking idiocy that is all too apparent on that Thisis thread makes me think these are not people that should be running a bath let alone a football club. But mainly because i think everybody underestimates just what a difficult job it is keeping a club above water in the lower leagues.

Admitedly fans only get clubs handed to them when things are really bad, but Bournemouth, Rotherham, Wrexham, they've hardly gone from strength to strength have they.

Rotherham are probably the closest equivalent to us, i don't think they own the ground either, and look where they are. No bugger breaks even on their football income, and like them we've no other assets, and no other serious income streams.

In our current state with the CVA pending i just don't think it's a goer I'm afraid.

Which leaves us with the current board, and the hope that the development goes through. (Because despite what the deluded what idiots on that other forum might think, there's no queue of people waiting to buy up the club and chuck money at it)

Incidentally on the subject of the development you made some statement that the board were only hanging around for that to happen and for them to get their money back.

Well Little Willie might have a hope of getting the £400k in loans that he put in back, but there's no fucking way it'll generate anything like what SSW's put in. And he know's it. He's just hoping it will stabilize the club enough for him to be able to turn off the drip feed of his own cash that it takes to keep it alive at the moment.


Fair shout the start was expected but i'll move on..........

I'll clarify a couple of things for you and then look at the rest.

I'm pissed off at the board, did they deliberatley hope to take the club down a division for the parachute money and two years (Including this one) of Div4 wages and put the "saving" on the loss to one side for the CVA payment next year?  

Or was it a gamble at trying to retain L1 on the lowest possible budget, that hasn't looked like it's going to pay off from the kick off?

I don't know but as far as I'm concerned, deliberatley taking the club to a lower division, especially the lowest one in the football league is unacceptable.  That division can be lethal to clubs who drop through the trap door, possibly into the abyss for all time.  That, would fucking kill me.

As we all know everything is about money in the game but hangers on like one Mr Carson (Who I think has made it plain on a number of occassions, mainly on home matchday, that he doesn't want to be involved with the club) might be doing himself a favour by hanging on in there, I believe he's doing the club a dis-service at the very least. This is especially evident when you look at his record of involvement with the club since his publicly admitted financial "mistake".

Wills and his money have admittedly saved our arse on a number of occassions in the past but as they have control of the club, i'll refer you to the bit about gambling.  The stadium issue is significant in all this as is this final cva of £900k.  I hope SSW's cash can sort that one out and I have no problem with him getting cash out of the redeveloped/new stadium and additional facilities.

Wills doesn't have to go, Carson does.  This is where the fans consortium comes in.  I wouldn't like to speculate on exactly how much his share is currently worth but I can't imagine it would be an un-realistic figure to achieve considering everything i've just said and probably a lot I haven't.

I could go on about the stadium as well but i'll leave that one with you.
Logged

Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose  and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.

Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
flammableBen

« Reply #57 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 21:51:44 »

Isn't Carson just the chairman becasue he was the only shareholder which would do it? I pretty sure I remember Wills saying he didn't want the job on numerous occasions.

I don't think willie does anthing with the running of the club so I don't really see how it makes a difference if he stays or goes. If he wants to keep his shares in the hope that the value will go up and he'll get back his money then fair enough.
Logged
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten

Offline Offline

Posts: 1475




Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 23:26:14 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
Isn't Carson just the chairman becasue he was the only shareholder which would do it? I pretty sure I remember Wills saying he didn't want the job on numerous occasions.

I don't think willie does anthing with the running of the club so I don't really see how it makes a difference if he stays or goes. If he wants to keep his shares in the hope that the value will go up and he'll get back his money then fair enough.


That's  what your missing.

The fact he "does nothing"  is exactly why he should go.  

If  a fans consortium held his share and seat at the table, they would be able to have more influence in the clubs affairs.  As a group, we have little influence with the council, and even less likelyhood of gaining any in the future. All attempts at a new/redeveloped ground have failed and as we know relations between the board, the council and the fans aren't exactly great at the moment. It appears no influence at the club either.

It's been shitty at this club for a long long time now and I think that the time is ripe for change in some quarters, deadwood like Carson being the first thing to go.
Logged

Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose  and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.

Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
flammableBen

« Reply #59 on: Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 23:33:05 »

Fair point. I wonder how much Carson's 2.2% share would be worth now.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
Print
Jump to: