|
fatbury
|
 |
« on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 09:44:35 » |
|
I think Iffy will go with
Heaton
Jenkins O Hanlon Ifil Nicholas
Shakes Pook Gurney Whalley
Roberts Bouazza
Subs Bulman Heath Migz Thorpe Wells
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 09:46:12 » |
|
As that but with CCP for Ifil, unless he feels abbott needs 'special attention', ie Jerel getting sent off again
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 09:46:55 » |
|
That midfield would be suicide away from home, to a club up the top.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
 Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 09:49:40 » |
|
Drop Pook. Gurney and Whalley in the centre for me.
I'd even play Comyn Platt ahead of Ifil as Jerel needs a kick up the arse.
If smith's fit play him left mid, and Bouazza up front with Robbo, if not, put him out wide and play Thorpe up top.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
le god cuervo
Offline
Posts: 1168
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:41:46 » |
|
would be surprised if he doesn't stick with 4-5-1. away to top side he'll want to keep it tight.
i reckon:
------------------heaton----------------------
--jenkins---ohanlon---ifil------nicholas----
shakes--pook--gurney--whalley--bouazza
------------------roberts----------------------
subs: bulman, heath, comyn-platt, thorpe, collins/wells/someone else
would like to see comyn-platt in place of ifil, but like mattbotslim said, ifil will probably be given a job on abbott.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:45:00 » |
|
Which is s hame cos one up front just doen;t seem to work for us at all. just invites pressure on us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:45:12 » |
|
i'd go with LGC
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:48:54 » |
|
It's effectivelt the same formation played in recent weeks but with fallon out and roberts up front, it has recently worked more like a 4-3-2-1 formation, provided the winger/forwards support up front and midfield, ensuring the loan striker isn't isolated in attack and the full backs get enough support to cover overlapping attackers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
 Online
Posts: 28528
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:52:19 » |
|
Who will be sent off this week then?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:54:31 » |
|
Personally I think 1 up top is a shit formation. Why aren't we just going for it. We've got nothing to lose. In five away games playing that formation we'll be lucky to get two draws. If we turned up and played attacking footie and took the games to the opponants we'd have more of a chance of a victory or two. We are not as bad a team in comparison with others in this league as we imagine.
Fucking grow a couple of balls Iffy and lets play some football.
Attack!! Attack !! Attack Attack Attack!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:55:52 » |
|
would be surprised if he doesn't stick with 4-5-1. away to top side he'll want to keep it tight.
i reckon:
------------------heaton----------------------
--jenkins---ohanlon---ifil------nicholas----
shakes--pook--gurney--whalley--bouazza
------------------roberts----------------------
subs: bulman, heath, comyn-platt, thorpe, collins/wells/someone else
would like to see comyn-platt in place of ifil, but like mattbotslim said, ifil will probably be given a job on abbott. The thought of the chavmeister up front on his own, is quite something, I'm better in the air than what he is, and the array of postures and pouts would be a sight to behold as another aimless hoof gets headed back. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:57:44 » |
|
i agree with jan. what have we got to lose!? (obviously a football match but thats not the point!  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 10:57:53 » |
|
I agree with that Reg, maybe we could sub him off at half time and play Thorpe up there instead, he'd erm, do a lot better :wall: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:00:02 » |
|
see what happens when we don't have Fallon...(don't hit me jan!) least he gives us options. unlike Thorpe...who doesn't give us any option but to just sit on the bench and pray no one gets injured!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:00:15 » |
|
Just been talking to a mate who was telling me about his West Ham supporting mate. The season they went down they played shit, defensive football, real crap to watch. He said this season the team turn up take the game to whoever they're playin, they win some an dlose some, but the fans are loving apparentely.
If we're gonna go down, I'd rather we did it playing like we did in the last half hour against 5th in the table Scunthorpe than playing defensive shit.
Fortune favours 'em!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
