I thought the football under Lyndsey was almost as bad as under Williams TBF and for me the only worse manager in our history was Sheridan, all 3 even worse than Beamish.
The number of games under Lyndsey we dominted possession yet created nothing at all, we took no risks, no shots we just kept possession with sideways passing, it was utterly awful to watch and so boring, yet I can accept boring if it got us results, which it didn't.
Tht was evident early on in Lyndseys career vs Gills, we had nearly 80% of the possession after we were against 10 men from the 10th minute yet we created zero good chances tried walking the ball into the box rather than shooting, took no risks at all looking for that goal.
That pattern carried on in almost every game under Lyndsey bar Mansfield away.
Spot on.
The Club shot itself in the foot taking weeks to appoint him and then pitol whipped itself in the face with every decision after.....
SL came out as arrogant (to me) in his pre and post match interviews, i know i would be trying to get the fans on my side and 'give me a chance' rather than ''I know all about it, ive done it all' attitude.
It was his first major role FFS....
Domination touch Football...it was shite and a tough watch..
I know you picked the Gills but for me the away game at Stevenage was the sum up, i think we had 70% of the ball , eleven shots, zero on target and lost 2 zip.
