The Club Charged By The FA

[pauld]

The link I gave is the same link the FA gave in their original statement.

I know. That's where I found the link to the full regulations which is the one I quoted from (and copied in the link). I'm not going to quote the full 15 page PDF in full though

Tenner says the charge is Rule E4 (conflict of interest) rather than illegal payments.

[chalkies shorts]

Is this the same Michael standing who played for the scum

[Flashheart]

Tenner says the charge is Rule E4

I'll put 1p on it. (I might only have skimmed through it rather quickly as opposed to actually reading it)

[pauld]

I'll put 1p on it. (I might only have skimmed through it rather quickly as opposed to actually reading it)

2p. I'm a high roller.

[Jimmy Quinn]

As a guideline what punishment would a conflict of interest bring

[pauld]

As a guideline what punishment would a conflict of interest bring

"Any breach of these Regulations shall be Misconduct in accordance with Rule E1.1. Any charge for Misconduct shall be dealt with in accordance with the Rules of The Association and shall be determined by a Regulatory Commission of The Association"

So there is no fixed penalty, it is determined by a panel.

I've had a quick search and can't find any precedent on punishment for breaches of rule E4. There's shitloads of agents breaching rule E1 (b) though. Hartlepool also got done for E1b and were fined £25k, but it's a completely separate rule so not at all relevant. Just thought I'd show I'd done some looking

[Chunkyhair]

Not clever enough to understand all of this and not got as much knowledge of the history of the club as many on here, but it raised a question in my mind - has any other club had as many shysters owning it in the last 40 years than Town?  There may be bigger shysters than the ones we have had, but fucking hell for sheer volume we don't half seem to attract them.

[Jimmy Quinn]

I've had a quick search and can't find any precedent on punishment for breaches of rule E4. There's shitloads of agents breaching rule E1 (b) though. Hartlepool also got done for E1b and were fined £25k, but it's a completely separate rule so not at all relevant. Just thought I'd show I'd done some looking

Nice ne Pauld appreciate you taking the time to look

[pauld]

Not clever enough to understand all of this and not got as much knowledge of the history of the club as many on here, but it raised a question in my mind - has any other club had as many shysters owning it in the last 40 years than Town?  There may be bigger shysters than the ones we have had, but fucking hell for sheer volume we don't half seem to attract them.

TBF, Pompey were for a time owned by a Russian-Israeli organised crime syndicate. That takes some beating

[pauld]

Nice ne Pauld appreciate you taking the time to look

I'm hoping the news broke in time for it to be included in tomorrow's Price of Football Podcast and they might have some idea. Although I'd treat anything they come up with with large pinches of salt as for an accountant Kieran Maguire can be quite fast and loose with the facts at times and has a nasty habit of answering a different question to the one asked.

[Jimmy Quinn]

I'm hoping the news broke in time for it to be included in tomorrow's Price of Football Podcast and they might have some idea. Although I'd treat anything they come up with with large pinches of salt as for an accountant Kieran Maguire can be quite fast and loose with the facts at times and has a nasty habit of answering a different question to the one asked.

He sounds like a politician😀

[pauld]

She sounds like a politician😀

Kieran? She?

[Jimmy Quinn]

Kieran? She?

Its been a long day😀

[pauld]

Its been a long day😀

[Jimmy Quinn]