Flashheart
|
|
« Reply #315 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:21:17 » |
|
It's been more interesting than an average match day thread.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Sock
|
|
« Reply #316 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:22:39 » |
|
That was because he clearly hadn't read the post he was apparently disagreeing with. If you're going to disagree with something, at least make sure you actually read what you're saying is wrong. FFS, mollycoddling much?
Not Mollycuddling just seems if someones view differs you are quick to take a certain tone with them. Bit like the mollycuddling comment actually :-)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19490
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #317 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:24:24 » |
|
It's been more interesting than an average match day thread.
Trouble with that is there will be another one tomorrow going over the same old bollocks again - less the psychology bit hopefully.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #318 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:24:53 » |
|
Again, science isn't about getting it exactly right. It's about doing the best it can and continually trying to improve on that.
The philosophy of science is indeed a fascinating area to get one's head round. But I'm with DRS, I see nothing in Audrey's musings that lie outside of what can be found in serious academic thought on the subject. Now consider this, analysis of vision and perception has shown a small but measurable improvement in observation by peripheral vision if yellow is worn.....high vis jackets etc. Applying such marginal gains evidence to our current lot might make Luke think we should wear all yellow kit a bit like Villareal, in order to speed up the passing in tight areas. Would this be a good use of sports science
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #319 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:29:17 » |
|
I disagree with everyone
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #320 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:30:54 » |
|
Not Mollycuddling just seems if someones view differs you are quick to take a certain tone with them. Bit like the mollycuddling comment actually :-)
Well, no. If he had a different point of view, argued it and backed it up, then fair enough. But he didn't - he didn't read what he was disagreeing with, and just asserted a load of bollocks as fact on the basis of nothing. Talk shite, you're going to get the piss taken. And it's mollyc oddling
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #321 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:33:30 » |
|
Can we argue about whether mollycoddling is a science or not?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #322 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:36:24 » |
|
Can we argue about whether mollycoddling is a science or not?
Depends on what Molly looks like I suppose.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 55565
|
|
« Reply #323 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:37:01 » |
|
I disagree with everyone
I agree.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ron dodgers
Offline
Posts: 2625
shaddap your face
|
|
« Reply #324 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:37:45 » |
|
I had coddled eggs for tea the other day
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #326 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:39:36 » |
|
I had coddled eggs for tea the other day
In the interests of science Ron, can you tell us a bit more about coddled eggs? They seem to have passed the Smeeton household by.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #327 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 17:42:41 » |
|
The pass though actually found the steward....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11800
|
|
« Reply #328 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 18:24:58 » |
|
Could have done with a bit more pace on it though, the steward had to come back up the touchline, taking the impetus out of the attack.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A Gent Orange
|
|
« Reply #329 on: Monday, November 21, 2016, 18:55:07 » |
|
At any point, has anyone heard why Sherwood decided on such a strange team selection? To drop Murray and play Barry in a position where he looks even less suited than fullback and to put Rodgers in as DM and Smith at 8 ahead of Thomas?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|