|
flammableBen
|
 |
« on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 16:21:50 » |
|
Just for those who missed the pre-match interview with Fitton. He sounded quite angry.
Swindon are appealing a court decision on Monday over £300k that a certain Mr Diamandis is trying to claim from the club.
This initially started off back around the playoff final, and were the reason behind Fitton's bafflingly angry comments after the play-off final.
Fitton said the original decision in favour of Diamond Mike was baffling and they started the appeal process immediately.
Think that's all correct, I'm sure the BBC will put the interview up or something else about it shortly, but I'm going on memory a bit here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
alanmayes
 Offline
Posts: 1437
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 16:36:28 » |
|
Well done Ben pretty much covers what was said.Fitton did say that they probably should have revealed this earlier.
Deserves to have its own thread,rather than being lost within the match-day thread,which a lot of people might miss.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It's not delusions of grandeur sir,it's intolerance of mediocrity and minimal performances."
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 17:35:51 » |
|
Fuckin' hell...Diamond Mike. This is obviously the invoice for his 'services/pay-off', which he thought he deserved.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57745
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 17:53:42 » |
|
Fat fucking cunt. Fuck off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 23:41:52 » |
|
Guess who's back, back again
Shady's back, tell a friend
Guess who's back, guess who's back,
guess who's back, guess who's back,
guess who's back, guess who's back,
guess who's back...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23568
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 23:43:03 » |
|
I hope he doesn't get a penny. In fact, I hope he somehow manages to commit perjury and ends up in the slammer.
Now, where's that road re-surfacing kit?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 23:44:12 » |
|
I think the road marking equipment needs to come out again
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Meth Test
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 00:07:08 » |
|
You never see Rich Pullen and Diamond Mike in the same room...food for thought that.
Mike Diamandis, Bob Holt and Sandy Gray - gods amongst mere mortals.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 00:26:18 » |
|
Court of Appeal - Civil Division
Monday, 17th January 2011
It is emphasised that the following list is provisional and subject to change until 4.30pm. Any alterations after this time will be telephoned or emailed direct to the parties or their legal representatives.
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL DIVISION
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS’ COURT COURT 71
Before LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY
Monday, 17th January, 2011
At 10 o'clock
APPLICATION
C5/2010/1897 SM (Zambia) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department. Application of Appellant for permission to appeal.
Before THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS
LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY and
LORD JUSTICE TOULSON
Not Before half-past 10
APPLICATIONS
A2/2010/1823(A) Swindon Town Football Company Limited -v- Diamandis. Application of Applicant for permission to adduce fresh evidence.
A2/2010/1823(B) Swindon Town Football Company Limited -v- Diamandis. Application of Applicant for permission to adduce further evidence.
APPEAL
From The Chancery Division
OTHER DECISIONS IN BANKRUPTCY
A2/2010/1823 Swindon Town Football Company Limited -v- Diamandis. Appeal of Applicant from the order of Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith, dated 19th July 2010, filed 26th July 2010. http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/cause.htm |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barnard
Offline
Posts: 739
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 08:24:13 » |
|
How serious do you think Fitton was when he intimated he'd walk if the decision went against us?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57745
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 08:28:55 » |
|
How serious do you think Fitton was when he intimated he'd walk if the decision went against us?
 Is the interview link online anywhere, I missed it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barnard
Offline
Posts: 739
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 08:37:33 » |
|
Dunno Batch.
Just to summarise roughly what he said.
The comments he made after the Play-off final related to the Diamandis case. It was around this time the claim was lodged.
The claim is for around £300,000.
He's very angry about this.
When asked about the AGM and doing co-commentary next Saturday, he said somthing like. "Well, if the decision goes against us in the court I may throw my toys out of the pram and not be around for the AGM or Rover's." Shaun did say he had a smile on his face, but it worries me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Weasel
Offline
Posts: 685
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 09:51:58 » |
|
We get £250k for Morrison. The fans question why the board aren't immediately spending that money on replacements. The board then publicise a possible bill for £300k.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 09:59:17 » |
|
It's like I fell asleep and woke up in 2005. Make it stop. Please.
Idious little man. I honestly thought we'd seen the back of him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thedarkprince
Offline
Posts: 2747
Hubba-hubba
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Sunday, January 16, 2011, 10:12:40 » |
|
We get £250k for Morrison. The fans question why the board aren't immediately spending that money on replacements. The board then publicise a possible bill for £300k. What exactly are you implying? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
