|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:39:32 » |
|
mmmm.not the type of player fitton talks about is he?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:41:06 » |
|
beggars can't be choosers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:42:20 » |
|
Unless he's got himself in some semblance of fitness then it's a huge gamble and goes completely against Fitton's philosophy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33911
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:42:22 » |
|
oh dear...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:43:23 » |
|
mmmm.not the type of player fitton talks about is he?
I think now may be the time Wilson realises a change of plan may be required because the other one hasn't paid off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
alanmayes
Offline
Posts: 1437
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:48:21 » |
|
We've been down this road twice before; in 80's with Peach/Rollings and then with Thorpe/Cureton, it ended with the manager's on both occasions losing their jobs.They need to think this through very carefully.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It's not delusions of grandeur sir,it's intolerance of mediocrity and minimal performances."
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:52:19 » |
|
i think a loan is deffo worth getting him in. a permanant deal is a totally different thing mind.he will be on a big wage,and is no spring chicken. aint gonna have sell on value either
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 11:58:41 » |
|
Fucking hell chaps, give the bloke a chance. Lets face it, there arent exactly hundreds of top class strikers banging on Dws door to sign for us are there?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:12:12 » |
|
Fucking hell chaps, give the bloke a chance. Lets face it, there arent exactly hundreds of top class strikers banging on Dws door to sign for us are there?
This is where a decent manager earns his corn though, by sniffing out a replacement in good time for a departing player....Wilson has had long enough to replace Cox with someone, and seemingly failed. On AM's point about Thorpe/Cureton...King although a poor coach could spot a player, Cureton didn't work out, but the following season he was leading scorer in the CCC with ColU, which suggests it wasn't a completely hopeless move.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:17:26 » |
|
So who is this "Someone" then Reg?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:24:48 » |
|
So who is this "Someone" then Reg?
Wilson gets a bit longer...he earned that by doing the job required last season, and he merits a few more games this, to see whether his summer strategy has been a success. If it isn't then we're back to firefighting and weeks of speculation about the usual suspects.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:29:13 » |
|
That doesnt answer my question Reg, who do you think Wilson should have gone for?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:34:41 » |
|
That doesnt answer my question Reg, who do you think Wilson should have gone for?
I've no idea, it's not my job. I had no idea who Cox was when he turned up, but someone in Sturrock's staff noticed him. The fact we haven't signed anyone doesn't mean there's no players out there.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|