Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: robbed  (Read 12763 times)
flammableBen

« Reply #45 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 11:38:35 »

Oh, and a words meaning is not the same as it's etymology.
Logged
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants

Offline Offline

Posts: 8784




Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 11:49:10 »

Oh, and a words meaning is not the same as it's etymology.

example then please on the word paki
Logged

pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #47 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:00:46 »

example then please on the word paki
Oh come on. The context and history in which a term is used obviously has a bearing. Would you seriously try and claim that for example there is a direct comparison to be made between the term "ginger" and the word "nigger"? Nigger comes from the Latin word for black, niger, but it is still widely and rightly recognised as an offensive and derogatory term when used by white people towards black people. And that offense is compounded because it comes with a history of decades of racist abuse, discrimination, violence and murder. The same goes with the term "Paki" - you use that term toward an Asian and it carries with it whole swathes of connotations, not from 40 years ago, but in the here and now. I don't remember reading about any of Ironside's BNP mates doing time for firebombing churches and scrawling "Gingers out" on the wall first. You know that's the context of what's being discussed here, so stop being so obtuse - as Ben says, you're just making yourself look stupid.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #48 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:01:48 »

example then please on the word paki

I'm saying that the meaning of a word isn't necessarily the same as it's origins. The word paki clearly comes from a shortening of Pakistani, but that doesn't mean it's picked up different meanings through it's usage.

Edit. I got beaten to my own response! Paul's was better anyway.
« Last Edit: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:04:26 by flammableBen » Logged
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:07:41 »

Magic, are you seriously suggesting that you'd quite happilly walk up to a stranger in the street and call him a Paki? Because that what your opinion would suggest.

And your argument for gingers doesn't wash. Yes, you don't like it and it can be seen as discriminatory, but the same could be said for someone calling me a fat cunt and the law allows it. Calling someone a Paki on the other hand is racial discrimination, which is a criminal offence.
Logged
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants

Offline Offline

Posts: 8784




Ignore
« Reply #50 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:23:03 »

guys your missing my point here. i simply stated i don't see using paki as being racist. derogatory yes. Which for that reason Sam no i wouldn't go up to someone and use the word paki nor would i call you a fat bastard or dave ginger. it's offensive and derogatry.

Logged

flammableBen

« Reply #51 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:25:01 »

And we're saying that you're wrong. It is racist.
Logged
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants

Offline Offline

Posts: 8784




Ignore
« Reply #52 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:28:35 »

And we're saying that you're wrong. It is racist.

we could go round in circles here so we'll leave it that we don't agree.
Logged

flammableBen

« Reply #53 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:32:42 »

You can not agree all you want, but a word's which main use is an offensive term based on the race of someone, with added bonus points of a history of being used as part of discrimination and hate based on race, is in fact, racist.

So you're still wrong.
Logged
spacey

Offline Offline

Posts: 2706



WWW
« Reply #54 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:35:04 »

we could go round in circles here so we'll leave it that we don't agree.

I think we should leave it that everyone in the whole universe thinks you're a big wrong stupid trousers.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:42:00 »

guys your missing my point here. i simply stated i don't see using paki as being racist. derogatory yes.
It's a derogatory term based on a person's race - what part of "racist" do you not understand exactly?
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12834




« Reply #56 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:48:56 »

YOU'RE ALL FUCKING PAKI'S. SHUT UP!
Logged
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic

Offline Offline

Posts: 4156




Ignore
« Reply #57 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 13:00:50 »

Oh come on. The context and history in which a term is used obviously has a bearing. Would you seriously try and claim that for example there is a direct comparison to be made between the term "ginger" and the word "nigger"? [/quote}

Anagrams ?

Probably not what you were referring to...
Logged

Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten

Offline Offline

Posts: 1475




Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 13:09:07 »

The voice of the Righteous....
Logged

Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose  and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.

Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #59 on: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 13:18:03 »

The voice of the Righteous....
The voice of the extreme right.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Up
Print
Jump to: