jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Offline
Posts: 12832
|
 |
« Reply #13605 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:04:29 » |
|
Unfortunatly he is right  It can't be! The previous board didn't own Austin, Swindon Town FC did. There are laws against 3rd party ownership. West Ham got nailed for that bullshit about Tevez. I simply refuse to accept that is true and/or legal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10186
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #13606 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:08:28 » |
|
I understand the sell on goes to the old board not the club. I wouldnt get too excited!
Surely that is against the law? what grounds do they have to claim a fee for that? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #13607 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:21:23 » |
|
If you buy. A business you obviously buy the assets.
Players are a club's assets
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #13608 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:27:10 » |
|
We'll probably never know - NDA
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bewster
Offline
Posts: 4004
We fucking love you Gumbo!
|
|
« Reply #13609 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:30:57 » |
|
Unless it was part of the sale of the club agreement in order to write off the debt ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6760
|
|
« Reply #13610 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:34:22 » |
|
Maybe it goes to Fitton and Co before the Black era.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm
Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #13611 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:36:02 » |
|
As Sanch alludes to, he isn't good enough or consistent enough to justify the wage we're paying him.
I agree it would be expensive to keep him and find out he couldn't do it after all. I guess I was up for giving him the benefit of the doubt, but not if it costs us the ability to sign 2 or 3 replacements. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #13612 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:37:52 » |
|
It can't be! The previous board didn't own Austin, Swindon Town FC did. There are laws against 3rd party ownership. West Ham got nailed for that bullshit about Tevez. I simply refuse to accept that is true and/or legal.
Unless its not directly linked to Robert registration, more "we will pay back N % of future player sales up to ŁY". Though the way it was worded on here doesn't fit with that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bigbobjoylove
Offline
Posts: 4198
|
|
« Reply #13613 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:45:34 » |
|
It can't be! The previous board didn't own Austin, Swindon Town FC did. There are laws against 3rd party ownership. West Ham got nailed for that bullshit about Tevez. I simply refuse to accept that is true and/or legal.
Exactly. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
|
« Reply #13614 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:47:14 » |
|
It will be a certain % paid to the old holding company I heard
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57751
|
|
« Reply #13615 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:48:03 » |
|
Just Roberts? All transfers?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DRS
|
|
« Reply #13616 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:48:44 » |
|
Austin
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Exiled Bob
Offline
Posts: 1562
Likes a moan
|
|
« Reply #13617 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 11:51:10 » |
|
Ever get the feeling that the club might just have an arrangement with Spurs...? Maybe it's part of the Leigh Mills deal that we've waited so long for...... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The_Doctor
|
|
« Reply #13618 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 12:00:11 » |
|
Maybe it goes to Fitton and Co before the Black era.
Bingo got it in one! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The_Doctor
|
|
« Reply #13619 on: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 12:01:02 » |
|
Just Roberts? All transfers?
Charlie Austin |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
