|
nochee
|
 |
« Reply #10785 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 18:51:36 » |
|
Saints mate reckons Barnard on a season long loan.
He certainly knows where the net is |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
 Offline
Posts: 64661
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #10786 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 18:55:58 » |
|
Saints mate reckons Barnard on a season long loan.
Thats a coincidence........ A Swindon supporting mate of mine seems to think Barnard will complete a move to Swindon this coming week. Has anyone heard anything of the sort? To be honest he won't cut it in the top flight so maybe such a move will be right for him.
http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?38991-Barnard-to-Swindon&s=e834a77ac5eb5004c40ddfd0099c1d5e |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #10787 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:01:41 » |
|
Saints mate reckons Barnard on a season long loan.
More likely than Harry Kewell. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dozno9
|
|
« Reply #10788 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:10:16 » |
|
Thats a coincidence........
Weird, wouldn't be a bad signing at all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #10789 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:37:55 » |
|
Haven't we been linked to Barnard in the past too. When I say linked, I mean in the fan rumour sense rather than anything media or club lead.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Costanza
Offline
Posts: 10656
|
|
« Reply #10790 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:41:44 » |
|
Andy King was quite keen to bring him in at one time (around the time of Leigh Mills' move to Spurs)
We got Yeates instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Langers
Offline
Posts: 4240
|
|
« Reply #10791 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:46:20 » |
|
Haven't we been linked to Barnard in the past too. When I say linked, I mean in the fan rumour sense rather than anything media or club lead.
I think we were linked to him in the L1 Play Off season. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #10792 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 19:51:01 » |
|
I think we were linked to him in the L1 Play Off season.
Thanks, that fits. Was definitely well after King, though it reminds me the 'best endeavours' Spurs owe us one so we'll take Bostock on a free thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cibocchi_Is_God
Offline
Posts: 486
The Italian Stallion
|
|
« Reply #10793 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 20:01:42 » |
|
Saints fan I know reckons Barnard is coming here too... Just a mutual forum rumour me thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #10794 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 20:55:45 » |
|
Do we need another striker? I don't think we do.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #10795 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 20:58:20 » |
|
Yes we only have 3. 4 if you count Storey
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #10796 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 21:03:59 » |
|
Yes we only have 3. 4 if you count Storey
De Vita? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mrverve
Offline
Posts: 1429
|
|
« Reply #10797 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 21:05:28 » |
|
Agent Darren has tweeted that Kewell won't be coming to us and also that he had his mandate last season  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wheretherealredsare
Change me
Offline
Posts: 3136
|
|
« Reply #10798 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 21:13:01 » |
|
Did they go somewhere nice?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Online
Posts: 15073
|
|
« Reply #10799 on: Sunday, July 15, 2012, 21:15:39 » |
|
Yes we only have 3. 4 if you count Storey
We are a bit light in that department so I can see the Barnard deal coming off. Having said that though, hasn't Tommy Miller played up front in the past? Or am I imagining that? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
