herthab
TEF Travel
 Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #5685 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 12:35:47 » |
|
Nominal fee, if at all. I suppose him being a high earner is one reason (The others being he didn't want to stay and he let us down).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9134
|
|
« Reply #5686 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 12:40:39 » |
|
I liked his work rate and liked him until I became heavily influenced by those around me. I felt he had something to offer. Like Batch says, there's a player in their somewhere. He's not half the player Ferry is though and it was an absolute travesty that Prutton saw time on the pitch over someone who'll tear his heart out for the team and dig in regardless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Riddick
Offline
Posts: 2908
|
|
« Reply #5687 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 12:58:48 » |
|
Really not bothered, he had very little creativity, put in a couple of good forward runs every 5 games, looked like he could get sent off every game. He added some height in the centre but we lost far more by not playing Ferry.
Seems like we've off loaded two of the players who came in and ruined the balance of the team. I'd have Sheehan and Ferry above those two every day
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blah blah
Offline
Posts: 454
|
|
« Reply #5688 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:00:11 » |
|
I dont think I ever saw him have a good game for us (that is a consistent 90 minutes) let alone an outstanding one. And lets be honest when we signed him at the start of the season, with his reputation, we all expected some outstanding games amongst the good ones, not an occasional average game amongst the terrible ones
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #5689 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:05:32 » |
|
Really not bothered, he had very little creativity, put in a couple of good forward runs every 5 games, looked like he could get sent off every game. He added some height in the centre but we lost far more by not playing Ferry.
Seems like we've off loaded two of the players who came in and ruined the balance of the team. I'd have Sheehan and Ferry above those two every day
Agree with all of that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gnasher
Offline
Posts: 5204
Prefers animals to people (in a non sexual way)
|
|
« Reply #5690 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:09:35 » |
|
Agree with all of that.
Apart from the Sheehan bit. He was the first to look for a new club before the season had even finished. He didn't want to sign for us in the first place and is only here because no one wants him, yet. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cats are better than dogs FACT
|
|
|
Riddick
Offline
Posts: 2908
|
|
« Reply #5691 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:11:47 » |
|
There are suggestions that there is more to the Sheehan story i believe. We'll struggle to get a better left back than him next year
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Online
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #5692 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:13:24 » |
|
We've already got Kennedy who is a better left back than Sheehan.
Good news about Prutton, he was awful - completely awful. How he got so many games ahead of Ferry and even Timlin was baffling.
Up there with our worst midfielders of all time, easily.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #5693 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:14:46 » |
|
Apart from the Sheehan bit. He was the first to look for a new club before the season had even finished. He didn't want to sign for us in the first place and is only here because no one wants him, yet.
I'd still rather have him over Rose, which was what I was agreeing with more than a general comment on Sheehan. I know what you're saying about Sheehan's displaying a less-than-stellar commitment to the club, still think on his day he's a good left back though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gnasher
Offline
Posts: 5204
Prefers animals to people (in a non sexual way)
|
|
« Reply #5694 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:15:18 » |
|
There are suggestions that there is more to the Sheehan story i believe. We'll struggle to get a better left back than him next year
Perhaps. But there's more chance of di Canio donning the red shirt than Sheehan next season. He won't play in L2. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cats are better than dogs FACT
|
|
|
Trashbat?
Offline
Posts: 1655
|
|
« Reply #5695 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:16:13 » |
|
On what basis is Kennedy better than Sheehan?
He had two loan spells last season and both sets of fans said he was woeful, In fact at Rotherham he was taken off at half time in a 5-0 defeat and never played for them again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6969
|
|
« Reply #5696 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:17:05 » |
|
Has Pericard fucked off yet? If not, hopefully he's next out the door.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bigbobjoylove
Offline
Posts: 4198
|
|
« Reply #5697 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:23:28 » |
|
Quote from Owls Talk.....
"Yep. He's six footer, can play anywhere across the midfield, and is what most people would call a ball winner."
Oh dear....little do they know!! Lets hope they sign him before anyone from Hillsborough reads our thoughts!!!
Sounds like us last season. Are they in for a shock! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #5698 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:26:54 » |
|
On what basis is Kennedy better than Sheehan?
He had two loan spells last season and both sets of fans said he was woeful, In fact at Rotherham he was taken off at half time in a 5-0 defeat and never played for them again.
how many times has Kennedy had a bad game for us? compared with Sheehan? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trashbat?
Offline
Posts: 1655
|
|
« Reply #5699 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 13:38:33 » |
|
how many times has Kennedy had a bad game for us? compared with Sheehan?
How many times has Kennedy played compared to Sheehan, you cant compare the two on that basis. He has played under what 5 or 6 managers who have never seen him as a first choice or even second choice left back in most cases. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
