Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Kaid Mohamed  (Read 5120 times)
dell boy

« Reply #15 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:35:26 »

Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji"
With Paynter, Cox and Sturrock available? Kaid Mohammed?  Soapy Tit Wank Nah.


He has a better strike record than our formidable front men who play every week.
In 2008 the three mentioned above have managed just 7 goals between them.
Cox 3 (1 pen)
Sturrock 2
Paynter 2
I would definitely put him on the bench and give him a run out tomorrow night, what have we got to lose.
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:37:53 »

Quote from: "dell boy"
Quote from: "Iffy's Onion Bhaji"
With Paynter, Cox and Sturrock available? Kaid Mohammed?  Soapy Tit Wank Nah.


He has a better strike record than our formidable front men who play every week.
In 2008 the three mentioned above have managed just 7 goals between them.
Cox 3 (1 pen)
Sturrock 2
Paynter 2
I would definitely put him on the bench and give him a run out tomorrow night, what have we got to lose.


And? He's nowhere near as good a player as any of them 3 in my opinion. Give him a run out if and when we are safe. But for now we need the points. Paynter and Cox are our two best so play them.
Logged
dell boy

« Reply #17 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:40:37 »

Yes they are, and that shows just how impotent a strike force we have.

We need goals, try anything, put Easton up front he couldn't do any worse, he's scored four in 2008.
Logged
stfctownenda

Offline Offline

Posts: 1818





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:45:29 »

Quote from: "Batch"
Quote from: "stfctownenda"
I think Lady was more suggesting he should be in the squad than the first team, .


Yes, we got that.

To clarify, in my opinion:

I don't think he should be selected ahead of Paynter, Cox and Sturrock up front.  1 of those will be sub.

He shouldn't be ahead of Mcnamee, McGovern, Easton, Peacock, Zaboub, or Timlin. 2 of those will be sub,

We need a defender on the bench, and a keeper. 2 more subs.

So there is no space in the squad for him.


But few of them are impact subs for me, I wouldn't argue there better players at the moment with regards to starting a game but at the moment we have a squad of players low on confidence not playing well why not throw a kid in with a barrel load of enthusiasm who likes to run at people plus he will be looking to earn a contract so has more to play for.
Logged
Frasier3

« Reply #19 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:46:01 »

Quote from: "stfctownenda"
Plus 2 goals in 5 isn't bad for a loan period especially as they played him right wing the majority of the time.


He also came off the bench 5 times so you could argue he wasn't even an automatic choice to start even at this level.
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:47:42 »

Quote from: "dell boy"
Yes they are, and that shows just how impotent a strike force we have.

We need goals, try anything, put Easton up front he couldn't do any worse, he's scored four in 2008.


The midfield is the problem though  Wink
Logged
EB1

« Reply #21 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:50:39 »

Quote

He also came off the bench 5 times so you could argue he wasn't even an automatic choice to start even at this level.


2 from 5 off the bench will do for me.
Logged
Luci

Offline Offline

Posts: 10862


Fatbury's Stalker




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:51:43 »

I feel a comparison coming on................. Wink
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14806





Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 11:58:59 »

As McGovern is proving to be a complete waste of everyone's time-could Mo not get a chance as a right-sided midfielder?
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Colin Todd

Offline Offline

Posts: 3318




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 12:02:12 »

Quote from: "EB1"
Quote

He also came off the bench 5 times so you could argue he wasn't even an automatic choice to start even at this level.


2 from 5 off the bench will do for me.


Great.

In the conference. In the same game.
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #25 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 12:04:38 »

No way should we give him a chance i would not want to replace our predator like goal scorers.......... oh
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 12:10:23 »

i dont think he's good enough for this level personally.
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12832




« Reply #27 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 12:19:47 »

Quote from: "adje"
As McGovern is proving to be a complete waste of everyone's time-could Mo not get a chance as a right-sided midfielder?


I think he's left-footed.
Logged
returnofthereds

« Reply #28 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 12:20:14 »

If he gets offered a new deal then i'm turning up for one of those pre-season open day games with my boots.
If he can play then so can I, (I'm 34 by the way) :roll:  :roll:
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16121


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, March 27, 2008, 13:19:35 »

Funny how despite the fact none of us have seen him play for 2 months, everybody seems to know he's been crap.

Give the guy a chance FFS. Everybody was complaining about the performance and attitude of the team on Monday. We have a young lad coming back from a loan spell who's full of enthusiasm and wants to earn a new contract - got to be worth giving him a chance ahead of the (apparant) "I can't be arsed to try and win" brigade.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: