STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
 |
« on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:45:13 » |
|
For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:46:18 » |
|
Bart.
Fuck off.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
jimbob
Offline
Posts: 1434
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:47:00 » |
|
For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum you really think he'd have stuck around for this long 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16121
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:47:47 » |
|
For the past 4 months according to a mesage from a Plymouth fan on the thisis forum Bart. Don't be a dick. That's almost 100% guaranteed to not be true considering -the source -the circumstances -the fact that Sturrock is/was still here
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 19:50:23 » |
|
If I cared about what was posted on thisis then I would be on there at the moment and not on here.
Shouldn't really rise to Bart. I'm sure if we all stopped reacting then he'd get bored soon enough.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:06:48 » |
|
A bit on a post on the thisis form the other day, when some bright spark saying that Hoddle is a shit manager because he has been sacked 3 times made me react. I felt like cyber-lumping the bloke.
I still browse it though, but only because that bape chappie and duke of banbury seem to know what they are talking.
Both have been oddly absent today. Hmmmm.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57753
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:13:45 » |
|
Banbury posted the 'what do you think of Coterill' post. Bape must be travelling to Devon tonight 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:18:12 » |
|
greeng4309 wrote: Rumours and I mean only rumours coming out from Argyle forums is that Sturrock hasn't been paid for the past four months and under the agreement of his contract he could have walked for nothing. Sturrock asked Argyle to come up with some form of compensation, quoted to be around 120k to help Swindon out. Might explain why your board were willing to let Sturrock talk to Argyle
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6761
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:18:41 » |
|
I know it's Bart, but with are board, anything is possible.
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 33884
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:25:12 » |
|
and this random bloke from plymouth would know this how....exactly....?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jimbob
Offline
Posts: 1434
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:28:19 » |
|
didn't muff get £225k for holloway??
we've gotta be asking £150k minimum
oh, i forgot, i didn't believe the rumour :?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Chris
Charlie Croker
Offline
Posts: 1472
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:28:21 » |
|
I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:30:50 » |
|
I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll: spot on.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redbullzeye
Offline
Posts: 1319
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 20:51:23 » |
|
I suspect this is complete bollocks, if he hadn't been paid for four months he's hardly going to be interested in "helping them out" is he? :roll: Plymouth fans have called Holloway a judas for walking out but now feel hypocrites for accepting Sturrock back at our expense. Cue someone to invent a story like "he hasn't been paid for x months" and then it makes it alright. I didn't think Luggy was so rich he could take 4 months of no pay in his stride :shock: Who would pay for the crates of superior white wine?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 23:06:45 » |
|
Tbh i wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't paid for 4 months. He must have been on a lot more than the players and we struggled to pay them. With the Best deal dragging on and then the Fitton deal i reckon it's quite possible.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|