The Grim Reaper
 Offline
Posts: 1779
|
 |
« on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:04:25 » |
|
...paying on the monthly installment plan, now is the time to surrender them back to the club and cancel the direct debit with the finance company. No more money to Newbury Plc must start now. Buy no tickets, no merchandise, no nothing. Until these cnuts have left the club they will not have a single penny more out of me. Look at the facts:
1/ Sturrock departure
2/ Takeover no closer despite continued promises
3/ Points deduction,WUP due anytime
This really could be the end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:08:47 » |
|
The club already has the money from the finance house
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:12:55 » |
|
haha the irony of football fans. club needs money, so lets not give them any.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:13:00 » |
|
What a stupid idea, surrender agreement you will be black listed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:14:58 » |
|
I fell sorry for all ST holders, at least if i take a stand i wont lose any money.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:15:24 » |
|
and as useless as the board are,they are not to blame for sturrocks departure.
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:16:50 » |
|
and as useless as the board are,they are not to blame for sturrocks departure.
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom. But he's used them as an excuse. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:17:04 » |
|
and as useless as the board are,they are not to blame for sturrocks departure.
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom. Totally agree. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:17:38 » |
|
The point is tho arriba, they haven't fought to keep him have they? I know you can't keep someone here against there will but yet again they have fobbed us off...
What with the takeover apaprently on the verge of collapsing aswell...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:19:07 » |
|
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom.
I'm not so sure about the Arriba. I think had the takeover completed a while ago, he was able to get a few players in on loan, he may have stayed. End of the day STFC is sailing close to the wind, we owe a lot of money. Sturrock has already been messed around by one sham of a takeover, perhaps he needs some stability at boardroom level and that's what Plymouth can offer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:19:47 » |
|
sippo,i know they wont fight to keep him.a few quid will come in in compo money and they will be happy with it.
and i am not defending the board here as i want them out as much as anyone.but i am certain sturrock would have gone anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@MacPhlea
Offline
Posts: 2325
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:23:47 » |
|
Do you not realise that this is their plan B?!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:26:24 » |
|
Fitton thought that sturrock was the best manager outside the premiership. I wonder where this leaves the whole saga now...
I know one thing for sure is that if he were in place he'd probably fight tooth and nail to keep him. Once again us fans are kept in the dark about it all.
I feel sick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:31:38 » |
|
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom.
I'm not so sure about the Arriba. I think had the takeover completed a while ago, he was able to get a few players in on loan, he may have stayed. End of the day STFC is sailing close to the wind, we owe a lot of money. Sturrock has already been messed around by one sham of a takeover, perhaps he needs some stability at boardroom level and that's what Plymouth can offer. I agree. I do blame the board / takeover situation. We will probablly never know for sure if he would have stayed had things been rosier at STFC, but I cant help but think it removed any doubt from his thought process Still, onwards and downwards  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Monday, November 26, 2007, 14:31:52 » |
|
he would go back to plymouth regardless of who is in the boardroom.
I'm not so sure about the Arriba. I think had the takeover completed a while ago, he was able to get a few players in on loan, he may have stayed. End of the day STFC is sailing close to the wind, we owe a lot of money. Sturrock has already been messed around by one sham of a takeover, perhaps he needs some stability at boardroom level and that's what Plymouth can offer. Agree with the final sentence but I'm inclined to think that following the BEST fiasco where they made it pretty clear he was going to be a sacrificial lamb in the deal, he pretty much made his mind up to take the first decent job offered. In that scenario, probably the only difference the last few weeks (including transfer embargo) has made has been to extend the scope of "decent job" to include Barrow etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
