|
red macca
|
 |
« on: Friday, July 13, 2007, 11:32:39 » |
|
Can anyone shed any light on whats going on with him.
Surely it would be a great time for him to step forward and basically say to the creditors bollocks we can pay the cva take the cunts to court and issue the wing up order
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
 Offline
Posts: 11588
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Friday, July 13, 2007, 11:34:06 » |
|
Agreed. It would be great to know Bill's current thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Friday, July 13, 2007, 11:35:52 » |
|
An interview would be spot on with an update on the court case (just to remind everyone it's still there) and to state he’s still waiting in the wings and that he hopes he could work with the new investors. Personally, as suggested on the UMDFC he should nip round the creditors houses and offer to pay them off if they issue the order!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
OneAndrewFitton
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Friday, July 13, 2007, 11:36:02 » |
|
The silence of bill is strange, he needs to come out and say something!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1779
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 06:00:35 » |
|
Or we could all forget BP and move on?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9738
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 08:30:45 » |
|
i don't think that'll work, considering he's either got a large stake in the holding company OR he's owed £1.2million.
plus he appears to have only had the best of intentions for the club.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 08:56:53 » |
|
Or we could all forget BP and move on? I agree to a certain extent but on the other hand we have been promised watch this space, the shit will hit the fan etc and nothing seems to have happened . i hope he comes out and at leat lets us know what is going on |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 08:58:45 » |
|
Even if it's a case of 'we're still mounting a legal challenge'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 09:03:05 » |
|
Even if it's a case of 'we're still mounting a legal challenge'. No as my first post said si now would be a great time to say to the creditors" go for it and try winding them up we are here and will pay off what you are owed". Fuck it get as nasty as he wants and start playing dirty ffs |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 09:05:11 » |
|
Even if it's a case of 'we're still mounting a legal challenge'. No as my first post said si now would be a great time to say to the creditors" go for it and try winding them up we are here and will pay off what you are owed". Fuck it get as nasty as he wants and start playing dirty ffs *Devil's advocate* But BP wouldn't necessarily be able to rival the other investment, if that's a better deal the administrator would accept that maybe? I dunno, I just think it's more of a grey area than it's ever been. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 09:12:58 » |
|
Even if it's a case of 'we're still mounting a legal challenge'. No as my first post said si now would be a great time to say to the creditors" go for it and try winding them up we are here and will pay off what you are owed". Fuck it get as nasty as he wants and start playing dirty ffs *Devil's advocate* But BP wouldn't necessarily be able to rival the other investment, if that's a better deal the administrator would accept that maybe?I dunno, I just think it's more of a grey area than it's ever been. Mate to be fair this does not bother me and if this sounds bad im sorry but i have no loyalty to bill power whatsoever if the foreign investors do have more money(which i believe they do) then the cva will be paid so there is no problem is their. What im trying to say is that i just think it would be half decent of the bloke to let a few people who supported him over the last 9 or so months know what he intends to do |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 09:21:06 » |
|
It doesn't bother me either Macca, but I'm just saying if you'd spent the best part of a year trying to take over a football club you're not really likely to want to screw it up at the last.
I can see both sides of the coin. The stalemate is frustrating as hell and all we're supposed to do is 'wait and see'. Personally I think BP has lost any Power he may have had at this stage and can only possibly regain it by legal challenge rather than counter-spin.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 10:18:18 » |
|
some things to remember about bill power:
1) he's a football man who's shown his commitment to this club, long before these current desperate times.
2) he has publicly stated that profits from any redevelopment will go back in to the club.
3) part of his fan's consortium manifesto is for fan representation in the board room.
i don't know any of the above are true about the new consortium, and given who is involved, i wouldn't hold my breath either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6154
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 10:21:24 » |
|
some things to remember about bill power:
1) he's a football man who's shown his commitment to this club, long before these current desperate times.
2) he has publicly stated that profits from any redevelopment will go back in to the club.
3) part of his fan's consortium manifesto is for fan representation in the board room.
i don't know any of the above are true about the new consortium, and given who is involved, i wouldn't hold my breath either. :goodpost: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, July 14, 2007, 10:24:02 » |
|
some things to remember about bill power:
1) he's a football man who's shown his commitment to this club, long before these current desperate times.
2) he has publicly stated that profits from any redevelopment will go back in to the club.
3) part of his fan's consortium manifesto is for fan representation in the board room.
i don't know any of the above are true about the new consortium, and given who is involved, i wouldn't hold my breath either. that last sentence though. you say "given who is involved". but we don't know who is involved do we? what if these investors have money than BP? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
