PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid
 Offline
Posts: 1953
|
 |
« on: Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 18:06:50 » |
|
Hameur Bouazza
http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/Professtional/0,,10400~29740,00.html
From my Watford grapevine:
"For a month, to prove he can do it and stop being labelled a 'good prospect', according to our Aidy."
He's young, quick with a powerful shot & seems to have spent the summer in fertilizer which as well as helping him grow and fill out has turned him into sh!t by all accounts. Shame really, though our old boys tend to blossom chez toi, so fingers crossed. How's young Jack getting on?
Iffy said Bothroyd was a mate, so the source isn't a surprise, but it's not exactly an older, wiser head is it? Nor a youthful overachiever. Looks like Curo or Thorpey will be shipped out on loan somewhere as a result.According to someone on thisisstfc........
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 18:45:16 » |
|
Fuck me another lightweight forward who will have a bit-part. Fuck me I'm joining Rich's army. Everything's absolutely fucking shit.
WHERE'S THE FUCKING EXPERIENCE :evil: :evil: :evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 18:49:20 » |
|
I don’t think you could make up a more unlikely rumour if you tried, probably means there may be some truth to it unfortunately
Would never get sanctioned by the FA as an emergency loan given the amount of strikers we currently have at our disposal and don’t forget the likes of Heath and Shakes were forwards by trade before their arrival at the CG.
Their tick but not that tick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34126
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 21:42:48 » |
|
Iffy didnt mention any names tonight, but the lack of crosses into the box was mentioned....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10233
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 21:53:22 » |
|
I haven't heard anything of it yet, doesn't sound like the type of player Iffy was after either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 00:33:03 » |
|
Fuck me another lightweight forward who will have a bit-part. Fuck me I'm joining Rich's army. Everything's absolutely fucking shit.
WHERE'S THE FUCKING EXPERIENCE :evil: :evil: :evil:   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 11:55:59 » |
|
Hameur Bouazza
http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/Professtional/0,,10400~29740,00.html
From my Watford grapevine:
"For a month, to prove he can do it and stop being labelled a 'good prospect', according to our Aidy."
He's young, quick with a powerful shot & seems to have spent the summer in fertilizer which as well as helping him grow and fill out has turned him into sh!t by all accounts. Shame really, though our old boys tend to blossom chez toi, so fingers crossed. How's young Jack getting on?
Iffy said Bothroyd was a mate, so the source isn't a surprise, but it's not exactly an older, wiser head is it? Nor a youthful overachiever. Looks like Curo or Thorpey will be shipped out on loan somewhere as a result.According to someone on thisisstfc........ Just seen on SSNews that he's signed for us on a months loan deal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34126
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:08:36 » |
|
Fallon, Thorpe, Cureton, Roberts, Heath and someone Bouzzzza
Can he play on the wing?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:11:50 » |
|
Well, it's not ideal, but iffy knows his strikers, and you've gotta expect someo emoving out before the weekend. Giv ethe guy a chance it could be just what we need, the experienced strikers haven't worked maybe a young'un will.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34126
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:12:56 » |
|
again, no sign of Christian Roberts being given a chance...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:15:01 » |
|
He never seems to be considered, does he? Weird.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:16:21 » |
|
Roberts attitude must have something to do with him not being given a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:19:25 » |
|
how did he get on for reseves yesterday?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34126
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:20:21 » |
|
He never seems to be considered, does he? Weird. It is getting a bit stupid now. I remember pointing out a King interview, where he was talking about a striker partner for Rory and Roberts didnt get a mention and again. Its stupid, because Bradford aside, every time he has come on he has looked dangerous. I hope this is part of Iffys plan, he'll play Roberts on the wing because we are not creating enough. Christian Roberts does still play for us right? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:21:15 » |
|
how did he get on for reseves yesterday? All i know is that he started up front. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
