DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #135 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:05:12 » |
|
It also begs the question as to where the money was last season and why we didnt significantly improve the quality of the squad in January.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
|
« Reply #136 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:07:24 » |
|
Maybe Fitton didn't want to spend the money on players? But Wray is happy to?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #137 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:09:41 » |
|
It would seem that way wouldnt it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #138 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:14:11 » |
|
It also begs the question as to where the money was last season and why we didnt significantly improve the quality of the squad in January.
800k was spent on players? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #139 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:16:29 » |
|
was it? on who?
...and how does that compare with money bought in from player sales? and how well did we do in the end?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #140 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:23:11 » |
|
was it? on who?
...and how does that compare with money bought in from player sales? and how well did we do in the end?
Ritchie, Caddis, Ferry, Benyon, Flint. It will be less than player sales though to be fair when you take into account Greer, Morrison and Austin. But we did spend. I take your point on the January transfer window though. We didn't do enough business then and it probably cost us. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59266
Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.
|
|
« Reply #141 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:27:39 » |
|
£150k on Flint
£125k on Ritchie
£350k on Ferry & Caddis (rising to £500k on appearances)
£100k on Benyon
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #142 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:28:09 » |
|
We didn't do enough business then and it probably cost us.
For which I still blame Wilson. The money was there, he just didn't know how to spend it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59266
Back Off Man, I’m A Scientist.
|
|
« Reply #143 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:30:40 » |
|
For which I still blame Wilson. The money was there, he just didn't know how to spend it.
Or nobody wanted to play for him. But yes it was Wilsons fault. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #144 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:33:13 » |
|
£150k on Flint
£125k on Ritchie
£350k on Ferry & Caddis (rising to £500k on appearances)
£100k on Benyon
...where did those numbers come from? 150k for Flint? 100k for Benyon? Christ, no wonder we didnt let Wilson spend. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14187
|
|
« Reply #145 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:33:51 » |
|
Flint cost 150k ?? Fuck me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #146 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:34:12 » |
|
Or what jj said. But the money was certainly made available.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
 Online
Posts: 21253
|
|
« Reply #147 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:35:07 » |
|
Think Benyon was more like 70k and the chance are that the Flint fee won't have been all up front either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #148 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:37:12 » |
|
What about Misun? Was he a freebie?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #149 on: Sunday, May 22, 2011, 17:38:52 » |
|
Or what jj said. But the money was certainly made available.
Still not 1.5m though. If the 1.5m is there now - then at a guess it would have been there in January? As far as I'm aware we havent had a windfall since January due to some sort of add on. If JJs figures are accurate then we spent 375k in January. Obviously not enough to get us out of the trouble we were in. Of course, the £1.5m figure still has no actual foundation behind it, does it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
