Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Time traveller?  (Read 2214 times)
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:12:12 »

Loony woman probably, but still a bit freaky.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11646933
Logged
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16471





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:21:20 »

that is odd
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
Ginginho

Offline Offline

Posts: 6997





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:22:55 »

That's ace!

There's obviously an innocent explaination, but it does look very much like they are talking on a mobile phone.

That Irish cunt waffled on for ages aswell.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:30:15 »

I love the bit that I read on this somewhere where he says "the only possible explanation is time travel". Yeah, sure, the ONLY sensible conclusion anyone could come to
Logged
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11626


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:33:10 »

Time travel is theoretically possible, I understand.  (Any quantum physics I used to know has mostly been forgotten...so pls don't ask me how.)

But in practical terms, you have to doubt whether people will ever travel back in time - for the simple reason that, if it was going to be possible to do this in future, our world (and our past) would now be full of time travellers from the 2300s.  And it isn't.
« Last Edit: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:36:10 by Ardiles » Logged
Cookie

Offline Offline

Posts: 1276




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:33:44 »

As long as the rest of the global communication infrastructure needed to make a mobile phone call, along with someone else to talk too, was also beamed back in time then a perfectly reasonable explanation.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 58314





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:36:58 »

Well I beleive it.

Clearly once time travel was invented the first idea was to travel back 1928, dressed as a drag queen slightly resembling the crow man from Worzel Gummidge whilst talking in a 1980's brick phone.

The only possible explanation is time travel.
Logged
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #7 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:39:19 »

I think it's time travelling into the future that is theoretically possible. The theory revolves the impossibility of being able to travel faster than the speed of light.

To have a mobile phone in the 30's though would mean travelling back in time, not sure about that.
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:39:31 »

I said to the wife, surely If it was a time traveller they would pick something a bit more earth shattering than A film premiere to go to. She actually  said that's exactly the thing she'd head for, bugger the building of the pyramids etc.
Logged
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:50:38 »

I think it's time travelling into the future that is theoretically possible. The theory revolves the impossibility of being able to travel faster than the speed of light.

It sort of happens already anyway. The faster something moves the slower time goes, but obviously you have to be going pretty fast for it to make any real difference. Think they put an atomic clock on one of the space shuttles and when it came back it was a fraction of a second slow. Which is sort of time travel.

Saw a documentary thing recently with Stephen Hawking - he reckons there is most likely some kind of force or rule of physics that prevents time travel to the past to prevent paradoxes occuring and fucking everything up.
Logged
Ginginho

Offline Offline

Posts: 6997





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:58:10 »

Think they put an atomic clock on one of the space shuttles and when it came back it was a fraction of a second slow. Which is sort of time travel.

If that's true then i've experienced time travel many times, in fact the clock on our wall is 1 minute slow, that pisses all over your fraction of a second, so nerrrrrrrr.

I've had occurences where my watch has stopped altogether.
Yeah.
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 58314





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:58:33 »

It sort of happens already anyway. The faster something moves the slower time goes, but obviously you have to be going pretty fast for it to make any real difference. Think they put an atomic clock on one of the space shuttles and when it came back it was a fraction of a second slow. Which is sort of time travel.

Its Einstein's theory of relativity and you only need a jet plane going round the world and a couple of atomic clocks to prove it. Which saves on the price of a space shuttle.
 

Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:58:42 »

Think that's called the Grandfather paradox.
Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 13:59:22 »

But she is dressed in the same style as the rest in the clip......most woman these days dont walk around in clothes from a hundred years back.....she was just itching her ear.
Logged
jb

Offline Offline

Posts: 800





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Friday, October 29, 2010, 14:01:11 »

Shielding her face with a pair of cloves apparently as its a man meant to be a woman..

Cracking PR stunt by the Film director..
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: