Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Razak & Pook on trial  (Read 14745 times)
michael
The Dude Abides

Offline Offline

Posts: 3237




Ignore
« Reply #45 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 00:17:23 »

Releasing Razak will prove to be an error though.

That lad has it all.
Logged
stfctownenda

Offline Offline

Posts: 1818





Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 08:13:05 »

Releasing Razak will prove to be an error though.

That lad has it all.

I know its rare you get a player with a shit touch, who's poor in the air and lacking in any football ability.  He had it all indeed......
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #47 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 08:46:17 »

[url width=311 height=463]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v482/gary_stanley_uk/pookcrewe.jpg[/url]

[url width=366 height=480]http://www.ctfc.com/javaImages/b5/42/0,,10434~6505141,00.jpg[/url]

Wonder who he'll be training with this week? Good luck to him though.
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #48 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 08:51:30 »

Fatbury has right clicked and saved as wankmag already
Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 17:29:00 »

Razak is with Yeovil now on trial i believe.
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #50 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 18:22:38 »

thanks for the photos!
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #51 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 18:25:12 »

Straight in the wankbank fatters
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #52 on: Monday, July 13, 2009, 22:31:23 »

Another trial, another goal for Razak this evening against RRFC Montegnee.

Also, Notts County lost 3-2 to Universtiatiea Craiova.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #53 on: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 12:07:04 »

crewe not offering anything to either player
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #54 on: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 12:15:43 »

crewe not offering anything to either player

Sky Sports News are late with that aren't they? Considering that both are on trials elsewhere at the moment.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 12:18:39 »

possibly.but then it could have been deemed as the players keeping their options open
Logged
THE FLASH

Offline Offline

Posts: 9436


Quick as a Flash!




Ignore
« Reply #56 on: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 12:33:32 »

crewe not offering anything to either player

proof required!
Logged

Clems Army!
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.

Offline Offline

Posts: 59595


Things can only get better



« Reply #57 on: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 12:38:29 »

Yeovil have offered a trial to Razak.
Logged

Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
Arch Stanton

Offline Offline

Posts: 1301


Wallowing in negativity




Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 09:08:38 »

Wow, Michael Pook in 'large wages demand' shocker!!!

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11719_5434247,00.html

Quote -

Robins set for striker deal
But Allen fears Pook may not link up with club

Cheltenham Town boss Martin Allen has confirmed he is looking to sign Tom Denton on loan, but fears Michael Pook's wages could scupper a deal for the midfielder..........

........Pook also featured against the Saints after a recent trial at Crewe Alexandra, but Allen is pessimistic about the prospects of signing the former Swindon Town man.

He added: "Michael Pook is a good player. He can pass the ball and is a good athlete.

"He would be a good one to get, but I'm not sure if we can afford his wages. Having said that, he doesn't have a club at the moment and he's been a good professional at the training ground.

"Michael has enjoyed it here and he would be an asset to us, but finances dictate and we know from last season that we have to get that side of it right."


Logged
STFC_Gazza

« Reply #59 on: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 11:46:10 »

Yeovil have offered a trial to Razak.

Razak mentioned this at the end of season do a while ago, I think Gillingham as well had interest.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8   Go Up
Print
Jump to: