I have no idea whether or not Caddis would be a good signing, I haven't seen him play since he left us.
It's clearly bollocks to say it won't work because it didn't for Kerslake.
If Caddis is now crap, and we sign him, it clearly won't be a success, but it won't be because there is some indisputable fact that re-signing players makes them bad. Signing players worse than you need is bad, regardless of where they have been before us.
Was Ling a second time around success? One who would go on to shine in the top division as it happens. Maybe that means we'll rise through the leagues and Caddis will shine once again? I doubt it.
That's not what is being said...
Lingy wasn't a success first time, only played 2 games, so wasn't someone returning with a reputation, rather a point to prove and aged 24, time to do it.
