Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 45   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Simon Cox  (Read 85173 times)
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 56512





Ignore
« Reply #135 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 14:36:44 »

FWIW I agree with you Dell.  At least that's how I see him today.

But I do think he has the attributes to become a very good player.  I don't know if that will happen in a season or not.

Got to get his head down and work for the team.
Logged
Anteater

Offline Offline

Posts: 1180





Ignore
« Reply #136 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 15:21:16 »

the lad will have a future as a pro, dell.
he has talent.so what if he was a bit greedy and had a bit of arrogance about him.
i'd love wilson to sign him if he can.he scored goals, and always looked a threat when i saw him play

Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #137 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 15:37:09 »

HRK does get himself into the box and has a go/may get a penalty, Macca should do that more instead of going outside and crossing at the first oppo.
Logged
Luci

Offline Offline

Posts: 10862


Fatbury's Stalker




Ignore
« Reply #138 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:25:13 »

Today, for some reason, I felt Cox might stay with us for 1 more year.

Its clear the board are showing their ambition by securing the services of Greer, and perhaps they can show it enough to get Cox to stay just a bit longer?

I don't know why i've suddently started feeling optimistic on this and have absolutely no sources so its just my opinion!
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #139 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:33:42 »

I thought that and also thought if we refuse to sell and offer a contract would we more than likely get what we paid anyway at tribunal?
Logged
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic

Offline Offline

Posts: 4156




Ignore
« Reply #140 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:43:23 »

Sell him back to Reading and take HRK on loan as part of the deal.
Logged

Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 22431





Ignore
« Reply #141 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:45:22 »

Reading have a hatful of strikers: Doyle, Lita, Hunts 1 and 2 and Shane Long, plus Kitson wants to come back. Oh, and the young kiddie Church.
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12663




« Reply #142 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:46:24 »

CUNTS THE LOT OF YOU
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #143 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:51:22 »

Cunts are useful unlike you you bearded hippy twat
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #144 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 17:00:06 »

I was refering to Dell. Also dont forget he was carrying a injury
Dell was shocking at the Rovers game, injury or no.
Logged
dell boy

« Reply #145 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 17:44:54 »

Dell was shocking at the Rovers game, injury or no.

I did my best, just lost my voice!!! Soapy Tit Wank
Logged
STFC_Gazza

« Reply #146 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:06:15 »

Posted this in the other thread but this is the main Cox transfer one... Leicester fans saying their local news is saying its a done deal he is heading to Leicester.

http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=59965
Logged
timmyg

Offline Offline

Posts: 614




Ignore
« Reply #147 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:39:42 »

They seem pretty excited on that forum, saying its a real show of ambition by the Leicester board (if it's true, of course).

Looks like the most likely destination, now...

Logged

never trust a nun...
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33082


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #148 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:41:03 »

Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?

I was on about Kanu because we were talking about Kanu.

If the thread he been about McNamee I would have said exactly the same thing though.
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14124





Ignore
« Reply #149 on: Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 19:19:59 »

Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?

not to mention the countless assists eh,Ant?
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 45   Go Up
Print
Jump to: