Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: wiganfan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:16:39



Title: Simon Cox
Post by: wiganfan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:16:39
Strong rumours in wigan that we are lining up a £3.5 million bid for him.
Any chances this would be accepted?



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Panda Paws on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:19:32
That's a shit load of cash, considering we're looking for 2 mil, i think 3.5 would be more than enough, even if that included add ons and the sell on clause


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wiganfan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:21:40
Like I say, it's just fan rumours so could be bollocks.

Hope not, about time we got a decent striker in.

Congrats on survival btw, although it seems comfortable looking at the table at the end, I doubt very much that it was for you guys.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:25:11
Lee Peacock is the man you want, Cox just poached most of his goals.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:44:41
Strong rumours in wigan that we are lining up a £3.5 million bid for him.
Any chances this would be accepted?

Accepted???? You can have our whole team for that kind of cash and you'd still be getting screwed over.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: yeo on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 00:47:14
Fuck me,they'd bite your hands off.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 06:57:11
I would give the cunt a piggy back up the M6 for that.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 07:09:32
We'll chuck in a free Kasali Yinka Casal as well.

Magic deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 07:46:12
£3.5M So good your paying for him twice?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 08:26:21
I would give the cunt a piggy back up the M6 for that.

You wouldn't make it as far as the A419 carrying Jamie Cureton, let alone to to Birmingham carrying Coxy.  ;)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 08:41:20
I think DW will try to get a player+cash deal for Cox if he goes to try to offset the 40% sell on clause a little.

I could be well wide of the mark though.

I would be happy with a good swap plus £1.5mill :) but £3mill....well I think we would bite their hand off.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 08:45:55
I think DW will try to get a player+cash deal for Cox if he goes to try to offset the 40% sell on clause a little.

I could be well wide of the mark though.

I would be happy with a good swap plus £1.5mill :) but £3mill....well I think we would bite their hand off.

Agreed - perhaps 1.5 mill plus a couple of decent youngsters from Wigan and we could open negotiations!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 08:49:19
£3.5m!!!!

Let the bidding war commence.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 08:54:55
Nothing on the Wigan forum I could find about this but well worth a look for the girl on the front page!!

http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=558


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:00:57
When I look at some of the fees paid for some strikers I think thatc 3.5 mill is reasonable and about right. If I were AF I would make that the starting bid & include a decent sell on clause too.
Kevin Davies went for 7 million a few years ago & dean Ashton for £3,000,000 & neither are as good as Cox.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:01:10
http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=558&fid=516&sty=2&act=1&mid=2126182609


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:05:40
3.5 m christ they can have the whole squad for that amount of money and the Don Rogers Stand!!!!!! :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:20:09
Kevin Davies went for 7 million a few years ago & dean Ashton for £3,000,000 & neither are as good as Cox.


I'm sorry, Dean Ashton not as good as Cox?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:22:05

I'm sorry, Dean Ashton not as good as Cox?

I would also argue that Kevin Davies has scored pretty consistently in the Premiership as well. 1 swallow doesn't make a summer.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:39:29
Yes, in my opinion Cox is better than both at this stage in his career


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:43:26
Ashton was the same age as Cox is now when he left Crewe I believe, so he had already scored 20 goals in one Championship season, played for England and every level up to and including U21 and scored at least twice.

Cox is brilliant and everything, but don't you think your jumping the shark a little?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 09:47:11
Kevin Davies went for 7 million a few years ago & dean Ashton for £3,000,000 & neither are as good as Cox.

AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 13:30:00
I'd be happy with £3.5m for Coxy


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 14:03:30
We are win, win,win with Coxy. Firstly we might keep him and build a half decent team round him, with the off chance he'll score 30 again and get us up near the top. Secondly we could sell and pay Reading their estimated 40%, this in the long run might pave the way for an agreement with them that we get their young players who might not make their first team, get them cheap and showcase them as with coxy and sell on at a large profit for both, Or do a deal with mainly players in exchange with some cash so the percentage of money we pay reading decreases and we get the equivalent value in young talent. We cant lose, it's all good i reckon.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 14:11:28
The money seems a bit OTT but the club is a possibility given the ones who have been watching him (such as Middlesborough, West Brom and Villa).  Do we charge Corporate rates for the scouts, because if we do, we'd have made a decent return in the past few months of the season in that area of the ground.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: EB1 on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 15:06:56
We are win, win,win with Coxy. Firstly we might keep him and build a half decent team round him, with the off chance he'll score 30 again and get us up near the top. Secondly we could sell and pay Reading their estimated 40%, this in the long run might pave the way for an agreement with them that we get their young players who might not make their first team, get them cheap and showcase them as with coxy and sell on at a large profit for both, Or do a deal with mainly players in exchange with some cash so the percentage of money we pay reading decreases and we get the equivalent value in young talent. We cant lose, it's all good i reckon.


I am hoping that in a couple of seasons time we will be competing with Reading  in the same division (championship) and that they will be looking at the potential of our young players. 

Are my expectations too high?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 15:23:03
Who knows, that might happen in 5 years, until then, might be worth looking at that as a source of useful players.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 15:48:04
Who knows, that might happen in 5 years, until then, might be worth looking at that as a source of useful players.

It pains me to agree, but I do.

Readings youth system seems to be strong at the moment, they had quite a few out on loan to L1 & L2 clubs most of whom did alright.

We should follow their scouts to Ireland as well. They've done some great business bringing paddys over like the Hunt bros & Doyle.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 16:26:38
It pains me to agree, but I do.

Readings youth system seems to be strong at the moment, they had quite a few out on loan to L1 & L2 clubs most of whom did alright.

We should follow their scouts to Ireland as well. They've done some great business bringing paddys over like the Hunt bros & Doyle.

Good points here, Reading's youth system is shit hot, as much as I hate to say it, Reading have gotten to the prem etc (and back down) but have had a steady flow of decent players. A lot of them coming from non league etc, they have a decent scouting network and have unearthed a few gems. HRK was great for us as was Cox, Who knows if Cox goes and Lita is still at reading that former City cunt may come to us on loan for a game??? Could do worse (and a lot better). Reading can see us as a club that genuinly will help bring players along etc.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 16:34:36
Reading are reaping the rewards of the Madejski-led revolution in their off the field activities during the mid 1990s.  Everything, including the quality of their scouting network, flows from that.

We've just got to hope that, ultimately, Andrew Fitton gets us to the same place - just without the soulless out of town stadium on a pub-free retail park.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 17:31:09
Reading are reaping the rewards of the Madejski-led revolution in their off the field activities during the mid 1990s.  Everything, including the quality of their scouting network, flows from that.

We've just got to hope that, ultimately, Andrew Fitton gets us to the same place - just without the soulless out of town stadium on a pub-free retail park.

I still think we need to see what happens when Madjeski pulls out. I very much they will get as good a manager as Coppell again. This play off could be their cross roads.

To be fair to the Wigan fan, even at silly money like £3.5m I still think Cox would turn out alright for them. He's English, he's confident, he works dead hard. He's very much a southerner though, that could come into it with Coxy.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 17:33:03
Reading are reaping the rewards of the Madejski-led revolution in their off the field activities during the mid 1990s.  Everything, including the quality of their scouting network, flows from that.

We've just got to hope that, ultimately, Andrew Fitton gets us to the same place - just without the soulless out of town stadium on a pub-free retail park.

Much of the credit for Reading's success lies with Nicky Hammond..bizarre but true.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 18:30:15
Why's it bizarre? Football ability and football business sense doesn't go hand-in-hand :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Dazzza on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 18:33:20
Is the sell on fee as much as 40%? 

If I can remember there was some negotiation that held the transfer up from Reading because the sell on fee was deemed to high.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:27:42
Is the sell on fee as much as 40%? 

If I can remember there was some negotiation that held the transfer up from Reading because the sell on fee was deemed to high.

Never seen it officially mentioned as being 40%, but I did hear Hammond call it something on the lines of "substantial" when interviewed on talk sport.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:39:10
It is 30%


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: newmarket red on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:49:08
40% according to ed hadwin and phil king during the rovers game they mentioned it whether they have inside info i dont know


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:52:30
Ed Hadwin spoke about it being 40% on the pre match amble last week, might just be reporters talk or he may have been told by someone at the club, I dont know.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:54:03
I heard it was 40% cant remember who said it, it might have been ed hadwin. I cant remember.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Dazzza on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 19:59:56
Christ, makes you wonder what it was before that figure then.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 20:05:39
Christ, makes you wonder what it was before that figure then.

I don't think it was the sell on % directly that slowed the deal. Something to do with an (extra) fee owed to Reading if he is sold due to him being a loan player before becoming permanent. Something the Football League would never sanction but is common practice in the Prem.

At least, that's how I remember it.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 20:16:25
It is 40 percent. In a ideal world we would do a player swap. Obviously never happen


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 07:50:11
I was told earlier by a wolves fan that they are having a butchers at him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 08:35:05
Well let me join this rumour fest. Big rumblings from our resident Geordies about Cox to the Toon for £2m. If it is true then at least he'll have a season or so of Championship football before he moves up.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 12:31:36
Perhaps it would work out for us to do a player plus cash deal


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 12:41:10
Perhaps it would work out for us to do a player plus cash deal

Michael Owen?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 12:54:57
It's got to be Nile Ranger


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 12:57:26
I'm suprised Newcastle haven't given him a few minutes given their situation. He's performing in the Reserves.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:12:30
Well let me join this rumour fest. Big rumblings from our resident Geordies about Cox to the Toon for £2m. If it is true then at least he'll have a season or so of Championship football before he moves up.

I can see that happening, especially if Shearer stays in charge. Plus there is no way they'll be offering Owen a new contract, on account of him being completely shit. I reckon Owen's best option for next season will be someone like Wigan, Sunderland or Bolton - no way a top team will touch him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:20:03
I reckon Owen's best option for next season will be someone like Wigan, Sunderland or Bolton - no way a top team will touch him.

Disagree - he'd go abroad ahead of those kind of options.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:27:37
Disagree - he'd go abroad ahead of those kind of options.

Yeah, cos that worked out real well for him last time. Plus he wants to get back in the England squad, he's more chance of doing that in a mid table Premier League side than by going abroad. As he's on a free he could just go with a one year contract so he doesn't have to tie himself down long term.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:33:40
Yeah, cos that worked out real well for him last time.

His season at Real Madrid was more than adequate considering the competition he had and the goals he scored.

Plus he wants to get back in the England squad, he's more chance of doing that in a mid table Premier League side than by going abroad.

Yeah, that idea worked real well when he joined Newcastle! There's no way he'd join Wigan or Bolton!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: nochee on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:37:54
. 1 swallow doesn't make a summer.

Can people PLEASE stop saying this!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:40:36
2 swallows dont make a summer, how's that?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 13:55:34
2 swallows dont make a summer, how's that?

but it makes for a decent night out.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 14:14:50
Errr, depends who's doing the swallowing, if you're drunk and in Brighton......


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 14:30:43
when in rome...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 14:42:03
when in rome...

"Yes? Please go on."

[url width=360 height=372]http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/images/anchorman.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 14:44:29
It's got to be Nile Ranger

Where's TCP these days to salivate over him ? did he run off with the youth team or has he been released on a free from his TEF contract ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 14:45:32
I miss him a bit


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: nochee on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 16:13:05
when in rome...

Definetly not!! Im in Rome  :zipped:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 21:12:03
"Yes? Please go on."

[url width=360 height=372]http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/images/anchorman.jpg[/url]

Did David Seaman work on newsnight?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 21:19:22
Did David Seaman work on newsnight?

He tried, but some of the stories went right over his head.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Thursday, May 7, 2009, 21:19:43
I miss him a bit

ahhhhhhh how sweet :) xx


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Berniman on Friday, May 8, 2009, 09:12:43
I miss him a bit

Liar!  :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:32:29
Celtic are the latest team rumoured to be looking at Cox

http://www.talkceltic.net/forum/transfer-rumours/60738-simon-cox.html

Some of the comments on this thread are cringeworthy, if he goes their I reckon they will be on his back from day 1.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:39:47
Typical big club fan mentality.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:41:05
Most of our fans are the same as that though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:44:25
Most of our fans are the same as that though.

Because we're a big club :D        .......... ahem.

Celtic would be a good move for him - as long as there was a decent fee, clauses, loan player and friendly involved!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Stef Troll on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:46:11
Celtic are the latest team rumoured to be looking at Cox

http://www.talkceltic.net/forum/transfer-rumours/60738-simon-cox.html

Some of the comments on this thread are cringeworthy, if he goes their I reckon they will be on his back from day 1.

Think he would do well at Celtic.  Watched Rangers vs Celtic yesterday and thought both teams were very dire.  The Scottish league in general is in decline, and playing teams like Hibs and Hearts each week is the equivalent of playing teams like Sheffield Wednesday  and Blackpool.

Whilst it would be a step up on playing the likes of Hereford, Cox could take it in his stride


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:56:38
if a average player like danny incincibile can have a decent run up there, i see no reason why cox couldn't


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 20:58:49
if a average player like danny incincibile can have a decent run up there, i see no reason why cox couldn't

Exactly.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 21:04:21
Some of the posters in the Celtic thread are a bit retarded - "200k for him and he's ours if we wanted him" type bollocks. However, a few are willing to accept they know jack all about him, and those who can count to 32 realise that's pretty good going in a season. Would be a big step up for him in terms of playing in Europe though, maybe too soon.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 21:13:29
I like the fact they're willing to do some youtube research too


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 21:15:34
Don't go there Simon PLEASE  :eek:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 21:16:38
I like the fact they're willing to do some youtube research too

I would expect a Football Manager 2009 comment to emerge soon.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 22:08:11
Celtic and Rangers get out bid for the likes of Fulham and Hull nowadays.

They might want to set their sites higher, but to be honest Cox is exactly the sort of player they could go for and make a success of.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ironside on Sunday, May 10, 2009, 22:50:55
Holy Jesus Christ (That'll appeal to both sides)

If Cox goes to the sweaty's league without first trying Division two then he's got mental/agent problems.  He could make it in Division two at the very least, without question.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Monday, May 11, 2009, 00:50:51
Simon Cox playing Champions League football!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Monday, May 11, 2009, 01:08:53
Celtic and Rangers get out bid for the likes of Fulham and Hull nowadays.

They might want to set their sites higher, but to be honest Cox is exactly the sort of player they could go for and make a success of.

They might be big clubs but they just don't have the money to compete with Premier League clubs and most likely a few Championship clubs as well - the BBC and Sky pay more for the Football League TV rights (£88 million a season) than Setanta pay for the SPL (£32 million a season). So they can't match the transfer fees or salaries, added to which who actually wants to play in the SPL? Scottish people maybe, but other than that?

It wouldn't be a good career move either would it? He'd get to play in (and lose) a few Champions League games, play 6-8 games against a decent team (Rangers) and then every other game against shit teams (League 1 standard). Going to pretty much any Championship team would be better than Celtic.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, May 11, 2009, 08:33:31
One thing that hasn't been mentioned, is the fact that maybe Reading might cast eyes down the m4. If they dont go up, and doyle goes, they'll be in the market. Be a no brainer for Coxy, and if we got 1/2 a mill, robson kanu and a couple of others of his ilk, might be a good deal all round.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, May 11, 2009, 08:36:57
One thing that hasn't been mentioned, is the fact that maybe Reading might cast eyes down the m4. If they dont go up, and doyle goes, they'll be in the market. Be a no brainer for Coxy, and if we got 1/2 a mill, robson kanu and a couple of others of his ilk, might be a good deal all round.

I agree.  Very plausible.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wiggy on Monday, May 11, 2009, 08:52:21
One thing that hasn't been mentioned, is the fact that maybe Reading might cast eyes down the m4. If they dont go up, and doyle goes, they'll be in the market. Be a no brainer for Coxy, and if we got 1/2 a mill, robson kanu and a couple of others of his ilk, might be a good deal all round.

I made a similar point on Thisis, but so far no-one there has agreed.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, May 11, 2009, 08:54:14
You sound surprised? Most of them cant agree with their own postings.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:06:29
I wouldn't want Kanu in part-exchange, young big head with lots of talent who is going nowhere in football. For me he has a poor attitude.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wiggy on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:11:38
I disagree. You need someone in a team who can weave a bit of magic and do something to turn a game on its head.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:13:45
Is John Moncur still available?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:18:07
We'll have Nicky Hammond back please.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:18:19
I disagree. You need someone in a team who can weave a bit of magic and do something to turn a game on its head.
He has a bit of magic about him yes agree, he also plays for himself and whilst we are in the lower leagues can be a luxury, remember Zaboub.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:19:21
Sometimes he does look as though he's going through the motions, but he is a good player and can only get better, what you might find is he would then become the big fish and up his game even more.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wiggy on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:26:59
He has a bit of magic about him yes agree, he also plays for himself and whilst we are in the lower leagues can be a luxury, remember Zaboub.

I was a fan of Zaboub. In his last season he topped our assists list by a country mile, even though he had obviously fallen out with Byrne and the fans were on his back. If Macca could consistently cross as well as Zaboub he would be the real deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:27:57
Saw the other day he got another year at Walsall, so cant have done too bad for them.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:40:20
off the top of my head.

In his last year with us Zaaboub topped the assists list with 9. JPM was next with 7.

McNamee is top of our assist list this season with 12. Zaaboub at Walsall finished with 9 again this year.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:41:28
Cox is off to Porto for 4.2 million.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:41:59
Sauce?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Monday, May 11, 2009, 10:42:19
I had a dream


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, May 11, 2009, 12:09:33
I had a dream

Forums' Martin Luther King?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 11, 2009, 12:30:22
Forums' Martin Luther King?

Forums Lex Luther:


[url width=300 height=372]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e305/jamsolo13/Lex.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: donkey on Monday, May 11, 2009, 16:32:51
The kids at school try to wind me up by saying that Leicester are gonna buy him.  I tell them if they have £2.5m they can have him.  I like the idea of a cash plus a couple of players that was suggested earlier in this thread.

Oh, and I thought Lex Luther was in Superman (and older) or the chariman of Hibs (and older).


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, May 11, 2009, 17:26:22
That is Lex Luther from Superman or the T4 show, Smallville which is about Superman before he was famous.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: donkey on Monday, May 11, 2009, 17:30:46
That is Lex Luther from Superman or the T4 show, Smallville which is about Superman before he was famous.

Not Superman 3, then? :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, May 11, 2009, 18:03:44
I was talking to an Arsenal fan at the weekend, who lives in Peterborough.

He went to watch us play Peterborough on the last day (well, he might actually have gone to see Peterborough, but more fool him).

Anyway, he did say that he thought Coxy was Head & SHoulders above anything else on display that day.

So, putting two & two together, Cox to Arsenal for £10m :D







Only problem is that he's English so the French professor probably won't be interested


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, May 11, 2009, 18:11:06
Dunno they paid a lot for Walcott didn't they? :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 11, 2009, 18:54:00
Oh, and I thought Lex Luther was in Superman (and older) or the chariman of Hibs (and older).

It was just a comment on hairstyles (and a Luther link).

Si Pie is right, the one I llinked to was Smallville.  The older hair a like was in Superman Returns. The Superman 3 one had hair I think.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:12:01
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/gossip_and_transfers/default.stm

Bit about Cox on here..cant see him going to Leicester with Fryatt there though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:14:58
I can. Fryatts viewed by many to be not really that good, and his early season form was a bit of a fluke


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:20:45
So your saying they would play Cox instead of Fryatt?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:23:56
Fryatts a proven flop at that level. Cox hasn't had a chance and is younger. All i'm saying is that the fact they have fryatt will have no outcome on whether or not he goes to leicester.

Add in to the fact they are both two very different strikers


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:27:38
Cant see them playing in the same team Dave...West Brom looks a good shout though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:35:36
Steve Howard would be an excellent foil for Cox mind, plays much like Billy except a little bit better and with less of a propensity to get booked/give away free kicks by breathing.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bennett on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:38:32
Steve Howard would be an excellent foil for Cox mind, plays much like Billy except a little bit better and with less of a propensity to get booked/give away free kicks by breathing.

have you ever seen him play?!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:40:31
Yes, but I'm suspecting that was a rhetorical question. Which part do you disagree with?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:43:26
Yes, but I'm suspecting that was a rhetorical question. Which part do you disagree with?

id guess that Howard is just a brute who smashes everyone


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:45:03
I'm not denying that he's a dirty bastard, just seems to be better at getting away with it than poor old Billy.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bennett on Monday, May 11, 2009, 19:51:20
i think that's probably more to do with you having good fortune to see Billy more often.

howard is a monster, i'd love to have him here though!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 11:42:51
Quite interesting for  a bit to releive the tedium

 http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/FeaturesDetail/0,,10794~1654671,00.html

Blair seems to be a bit of a sporty type.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 12:54:57
Well we know what Blair will be doing after his football days are over.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 12:59:20
He might as well switch over now


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 13:40:19
Im not sure why but that interview makes him come across a bit too billy big head for my liking



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 16:33:45
Like every interview you mean?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: yeo on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 17:51:54
Favourite Program - Friends



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 18:10:55
Urgh.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 18:16:26
PNE should will sign cox. Him and Parkin up front, they'll be looking for that extra push after this seasons disappointment


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spy on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:08:30
I wouldn't want Kanu in part-exchange, young big head with lots of talent who is going nowhere in football. For me he has a poor attitude.

I agree. Against Rovers he looked like he had the "I'm off soon so it doesn't matter to me" attitude.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:20:56
He is 19 for fucksake. Some of his goals were vital. His arrival was as important as greers on reflection. Northampton and brighton away he was quality. Has played not even a season and people have him on the scrap heap already


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:23:40
And Colchester away, he was our most dangerous player, he wasn't bothered against rovers i agree, but no reason to write him off, i'd have him back without a doubt.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spy on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:29:45
I wasn't denying he had an impact or that he has skill. Just saying what I saw against Rovers.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:37:18
I was refering to Dell. Also dont forget he was carrying a injury


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 10:39:04
1st time I saw HRK was against Hartlepoo when I thought he was one of the worst players ever to grace the CG in a Town shirt.

The next 3 times I saw him he looked head and shoulders better than Macca/JPM/et al and at Yeovil we crumbled when he left the pitch after 20mins or so and couldnt put another attack together.

I would welcome im on a season long loan or a permanant deal.

He is a typical winger....inconsistant but IMO hes a lot better and more consistant than Macca.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 12:47:33
I was refering to Dell. Also dont forget he was carrying a injury
He is quite skillful, scored some important goals and yes he is very young.
When he has played a few more games and teams get to know him, he will be very easy to take out of the game, he always turns the same way with the ball at his feet, he couldnt tackle my grandmother, he cant be arsed if he loses the ball, doesnt play for anyone else but himself and for me has a big headed 'I come from a bigger club attitude' - the guy is going nowhere, well maybe here.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 13:38:02
the lad will have a future as a pro, dell.
he has talent.so what if he was a bit greedy and had a bit of arrogance about him.
i'd love wilson to sign him if he can.he scored goals, and always looked a threat when i saw him play


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 13:43:06
he needs some working on thats for certain, rough diamond and all that.

two things about him stick out for where he really lets himseld down. Tracking back, he just doesnt. When we get hit on the break he is always the last man forward as Paynter (other over looked attribute of his) and Cox get back to help defend on the edge of our own box whilst Kanu is still in there half. Second, is just knocking it past the full back and running. Down the right against Rovers he had their full back for pace but he kept cutting inside or doing step overs.

No co-incidense he came off. Amankwaah kept over lapping all he was doing was drawing the full back in, knocking it past him getting there first and crossing it in. Naturally thats where our winning goal game from.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 13:48:47
he needs some working on thats for certain, rough diamond and all that.

And for that reason, I can't see him being a part of Reading's plans for next season - he just isn't Championship playoff quality at the moment, he might be one day but not at the moment. I reckon we'd get him on a season long loan, if Wilson wants him that is.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 13:57:00
I'd certainly agree with that.

I cant see him getting into Readings first team squad next season


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 14:26:18
Can't help but feel Dell's being a bit harsh. 4 goals and 4 assists (I think it was) in 20 games isn't a bad return. He was getting better the longer the run in the team though I was more than annoyed by him against Rovers.

He can be frustrating but unlike players senior, he could actually develop and improve. If you think back to Zaaboub, Roberts and even McNamee, there's definitely a trend in that they're not good all round players and they have shortfalls in their gameplay and skills. I'm not going to say "that's why they play for Swindon" because as Cox has proved, we can get a gem of a player here. But there is a limited pool of talent you're going to get here and it's no coincidence that we haven't had any wingers here which are good all rounders.

Besides, I've seen Kanu track back and tackle in games. He just doesn't do it all of the time. I'm sure whoever his manager is can get him doing it more often.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 14:36:44
FWIW I agree with you Dell.  At least that's how I see him today.

But I do think he has the attributes to become a very good player.  I don't know if that will happen in a season or not.

Got to get his head down and work for the team.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Anteater on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 15:21:16
the lad will have a future as a pro, dell.
he has talent.so what if he was a bit greedy and had a bit of arrogance about him.
i'd love wilson to sign him if he can.he scored goals, and always looked a threat when i saw him play

Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 15:37:09
HRK does get himself into the box and has a go/may get a penalty, Macca should do that more instead of going outside and crossing at the first oppo.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Luci on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:25:13
Today, for some reason, I felt Cox might stay with us for 1 more year.

Its clear the board are showing their ambition by securing the services of Greer, and perhaps they can show it enough to get Cox to stay just a bit longer?

I don't know why i've suddently started feeling optimistic on this and have absolutely no sources so its just my opinion!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:33:42
I thought that and also thought if we refuse to sell and offer a contract would we more than likely get what we paid anyway at tribunal?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:43:23
Sell him back to Reading and take HRK on loan as part of the deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:45:22
Reading have a hatful of strikers: Doyle, Lita, Hunts 1 and 2 and Shane Long, plus Kitson wants to come back. Oh, and the young kiddie Church.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:46:24
CUNTS THE LOT OF YOU


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 16:51:22
Cunts are useful unlike you you bearded hippy twat


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 17:00:06
I was refering to Dell. Also dont forget he was carrying a injury
Dell was shocking at the Rovers game, injury or no.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 17:44:54
Dell was shocking at the Rovers game, injury or no.

I did my best, just lost my voice!!! :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:06:15
Posted this in the other thread but this is the main Cox transfer one... Leicester fans saying their local news is saying its a done deal he is heading to Leicester.

http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=59965


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: timmyg on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:39:42
They seem pretty excited on that forum, saying its a real show of ambition by the Leicester board (if it's true, of course).

Looks like the most likely destination, now...



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 18:41:03
Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?

I was on about Kanu because we were talking about Kanu.

If the thread he been about McNamee I would have said exactly the same thing though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: adje on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 19:19:59
Agree totally Arriba ! I think you're harsh DV. When you mention excessive step overs, not being able to beat the full back for pace and not tracking back are you sure you don't mean Macnamee ?

not to mention the countless assists eh,Ant?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 19:29:52
HRK does get himself into the box and has a go/may get a penalty, Macca should do that more instead of going outside and crossing at the first oppo.

That's my biggest criticism of McNamee, he must get nose bleeds or something if he goes in the penalty area as he does everything he can to avoid it. I'd like to see him going in more and taking players on, he can get past them and he's likely to get taken out a good few times. He needs to spend a few hours a day working on his finishing as well as he could do with scoring a few.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 19:35:56
I like Kanu..reminds me of Ham Bouazza alot in the fact some matches he looks great others poor...for me alot of that is down to management,ie playing players in the right positions,to me it seems to be a sign of the times and playing players out of position...Timlin being a case in point,it nearly finished him as a player...i like Kanu playing through the middle,dosnt always get it right but he isnt afraid of taking players on instead of passing and taking the easy route.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 21:32:19
Kanu has a lot of good attributes - he scores goals and is a fairly big lad and he's young and got a lot to learn. He played a good part in keeping us up - agree about his performance against Rovers but he's a young lad and he was playing in a shit side. He was certainly better than a lot of our permananet signings althuogh thats not saying much. On the negative side he scores goals because he's a greedy bastard but if you don't buy a ticket you won't win the lottery. Also some of the positions he takes up are shit. There was one game ( Hartleppol or 'Nam ) where he had acres of space but kept running up against the defender.
Overall, I'd welcome him back. He's not perefect but the love affair with Macca is over and he's be a good asset.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: blinkpip on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 21:41:03
Posted this in the other thread but this is the main Cox transfer one... Leicester fans saying their local news is saying its a done deal he is heading to Leicester.

http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=59965
knowitall who posts on there is a insider who rarely gets things wrong apparently. 80% done, unless cox has a change of heart.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 21:47:28
Surprised if it's done so quickly. Thought we'd/he'd wait until all the options are on the table before deciding. Maybe they are.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:01:44
knowitall who posts on there is a insider who rarely gets things wrong apparently. 80% done, unless cox has a change of heart.
'knowitall' said that Cox has been at their training ground, when he's actually on holiday right now....
I doubt this guy really knows anything.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:04:18
Unless he is on holiday in leicester. OK nobody goes to Leicester unless they have to


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:12:17
knowitall who posts on there is a insider who rarely gets things wrong apparently. 80% done, unless cox has a change of heart.

I love comments like this.........if he/she rarely gets things wrong why is it an 80% chance? That's not rare, it's slightly uncommon!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:16:17
I love comments like this.........if he/she rarely gets things wrong why is it an 80% chance? That's not rare, it's slightly uncommon!

It's hardly 6sigma.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:28:08
It's hardly 6sigma.

spelling mistake?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:37:47
spelling mistake?

No?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:39:33
you have lost me axs  :notworthy:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:40:42
you have lost me axs  :notworthy:

I'm 99.99997% certain of that.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:41:47
And for what it's worth I was backing up your statement.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:42:45
If this is a maths thing I only got to A level  :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:43:32
If this is a maths thing I only got to A level  :D

It's not really. Can't be arsed to explain, it's dull but google it if you're bothered.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:46:40
It's not really. Can't be arsed to explain, it's dull but google it if you're bothered.

Did as you said  :zzz:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 22:47:39
Did as you said  :zzz:

I did warn you.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 07:14:51
two bids have been turned down. One from Leicester and the other apparently Celtic


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:20:04
I don't think he will go north of the border.....yes its a huge club but I think he will opt to stay in the south of the country, well Brum/Leicester south anyway.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: A Gent Orange on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:32:23
two bids have been turned down. One from Leicester and the other apparently Celtic
West Brom will surely be in at some point too - perhaps when the season ends - as they've certainly had a good look. Then we've got a proper bidding war.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:46:13
I don't think he will go north of the border.....yes its a huge club but I think he will opt to stay in the south of the country, well Brum/Leicester south anyway.
Do you seriously think a 21 year old lad would turn down a chance to play champions league football for a team like celtic? If the club did accept a bid for him from celtic if i was cox i would jump at that chance.Playing in front of a packed house every week with a very good chance of winning the title and playing european football.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:47:31
Depends if Cox would actually get a game at Celtic or whether he'd end up a squad player. He's done the latter at Reading, hence why we got him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:49:44
Has the whole "Cox doesn't want to venture far" argument ended now? Because Leicester and Glasgow would surely not be Cox's ideal destination!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:53:49
I think he will go anywhere he thinks he will get success.Its ok saying he will get a game at leicester but thats no good if they finish bottom half of the table.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:59:02
Cox and Scott Macdonald are pretty similar types of players. I think Cox is better


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 08:59:56
Why not, if he scores 20 odd goals for a couple of seasons he'll end up in the Prem. Doesn't matter where Leicester finish.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 10:16:17
I thought that and also thought if we refuse to sell and offer a contract would we more than likely get what we paid anyway at tribunal?
I've never been convinced he'll go. He is under contract for another year at least so if we were offered £200 million the board could still reject the offer (unless there is a "trigger" clause in his contract). So it won't go to a tribunal.
From what I've heard AF will let him go IF the deal is right for STFC AND the player. That means a decent fee amongst other things, not a wedge in a paper bag as in previous boards. Even if a bid is accepted, Cox may not go. He loves playing for us  every week & if convinced we will push for promotion next year may prefer the near certainty of first team football at the top of Div 1 with a club he knows, rather than a squad player in mid table of the championship.
If he stays, he will get a new contract with us on higher wages, score more goals next season, & hopefully help get us up. If he is in demand now, he certainly would be after that.




Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07:23
Depends if Cox would actually get a game at Celtic or whether he'd end up a squad player. He's done the latter at Reading, hence why we got him.
That what I was getting at DRS, I cant see him being anwhere near playing in the first team at Celtic, if he only makes the bench and doesnt get regular games then he wont be anywhere near Champions League games.

I think at his current level of development then he will make the jump to championship level easily but the step up to the level expected at Celtic....more unlikely IMO.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:31:49
Let's be honest here, we don't have to sell Cox as we are not in financial trouble so that means that we can afford to turn down early bids knowing very well there are others clubs interested, and bigger than Leicester, so should offer a bigger fee, hopefully that will send a message to clubs that Swindon will only sell if the other is a "blow you out of the water" type of offer.

Bear in mind there is a reported 40% sell on to Reading so the offer has to be a really good offer for us to get in some real good money.

I think it would be a mistake for Cox to go to Leicester as at the moment they are still in development under Madaric and will probably not be a team that is likely to challenge, and Celtic Cox will be a squad player at best, if he has aspirations of playing in the prem then going to Celtic and getting forgotten about is the wrong move.

I expect Cox will also think of his gf as I beleive she works in Reading so it would mean her uprooting and leaving her job and freinds if he went up north...I'm sure that will be a factor on where Cox goes also.

On other note I hear that Celtic are also interested in Morrison but how refreshing for a stfc to turn offers down.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:06:38
For those who have made bids, Leicester look like the favourites, I'm sure he will be gone before the end of June.
I still think there are two clubs to play their hand yet and this is good news for us moneywise and they would also be preferred moves for Coxy - back to Reading and a move just down the motorway to QPR.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:08:59
why reading? they dont even have a manager at the moment


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:10:04
Yep. I'd be shocked if Q.P.R. weren't in for him. I also think Bristol City will try (and fail) to get him. They're in serious need of goals.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:13:55
For those who have made bids, Leicester look like the favourites, I'm sure he will be gone before the end of June.

If he is going to go (and he is), then I hope he is gone by the end of June.  Any later than that and his departure will overshadow pre-season preparations.  It would also give us a better shot at finding a suitable replacement.

I wouldn't even be surprised if Cox was gone by the end of May.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:25:17
why reading? they dont even have a manager at the moment
Kitson goes back from loan, according to what I'm hearing in Reading - Lita, Long and Hunt will all be sold pre-season that will accrue about £8m and Mr M needs the money to bring in new blood, they have to go up next season (last balloon payment from the Premier) or tumble down the division.
Cox is a Reading boy, and would be a good signing for them at a reasonable price, seeing they get 30% off the fee anyway.
He would also be a very popular choice with the fans, they couldn't believe Reading released him in the first place and kept Lita.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:35:55
Cox won't go back to Reading. I listened to a recent interview with him where he clearly stated that he still feels bitter about never being given a fair crack in the first team there.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wokinghamred on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:39:49
Kitson goes back from loan, according to what I'm hearing in Reading - Lita, Long and Hunt will all be sold pre-season that will accrue about £8m and Mr M needs the money to bring in new blood, they have to go up next season (last balloon payment from the Premier) or tumble down the division.
Cox is a Reading boy, and would be a good signing for them at a reasonable price, seeing they get 30% off the fee anyway.
He would also be a very popular choice with the fans, they couldn't believe Reading released him in the first place and kept Lita.

And Brendan Rodgers, the Watford manager, is an early favorite to take over at Reading. He was in charge of the Reading academy for 6 years while Cox was there. Maybe Coxy will hang around to see if anything happens with reading.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wokinghamred on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:49:13
Cox won't go back to Reading. I listened to a recent interview with him where he clearly stated that he still feels bitter about never being given a fair crack in the first team there.

Yeah, but the entire management team of Coppell, Downes & Dillon that didn't play him have now gone. I bet he could be tempted.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 13:58:24
I wouldnt be surprised if he went back to Reading, he is still a supporter of theirs and as stated above...the whole management structure may well be changed by the time he would return.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 15:50:50
He's a Liverpool fan, not a Reading fan.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 16:05:09
 The thought occurred to me also...would settle the add on clause.

 


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 19:37:03
Yep. I'd be shocked if Q.P.R. weren't in for him. I also think Bristol City will try (and fail) to get him. They're in serious need of goals.


My hunch is Swansea or Palace.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ronnie21 on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 19:43:19
My hunch is Swansea or Palace.
Swansea might not be a bad shout, I did read that somebody was offering £3.5 mill. for Jason Scotland!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, May 14, 2009, 19:46:18
He'd be a good replacement for Scotland. If not though I can't see Swansea having the financial clout to put in a decent enough offer for him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:00:06
I like the cut of Mr Fitton's jib...

Quote
ANDREW Fitton has again warned the clubs coveting Town player of the year Simon Cox that only a “very special offer’’ will prise the 32-goal striker away from the County Ground.

Cox looks likely to become the subject of a looming bidding war following Fitton’s confirmation that Town had two fresh offers for the 22-year-old, one from Coca-Cola League One champions Leicester City and the other believed to be from Scottish champions Celtic.

The Championship-bound Foxes look certain to test Town’s resolve again, chairman Milan Mandaric admitting that Cox was high on their list of summer transfer targets.

But Town chairman Fitton confirmed: “The club has had a number of contacts both verbal and in writing from interested parties, but none of those offers have been accepted.

“We’ve had two written offers and it’s true that those weren’t offers that we’d be likely to accept.

“It’s going to take a very special offer to prise Simon Cox away. He’s a class act and comfortably the best striker in the division.

“We have no need to sell him and we have no desire to sell him
, but equally it’s part of our job to help develop players and then allow them to move at the agreed time.”

Cox has a year to go on his current contract and the club have not given up hope of persuading him to extend his stay

But the future of the player has been at the centre of months of speculation with manager Danny Wilson admitting that it was “unrealistic’’ not to expect heightened interest in the ex-Reading frontman over the summer.

Last season Cox, who has scored 47 goals in 88 appearances for Swindon, was the subject of a believed £500,000 bid by League One rivals Huddersfield.

Town rejected that out of hand, but Premier League basement boys West Brom, Bolton, Hull City top flight-bound Wolverhampton Wanderers and Championship outfits Queens Park Rangers and Bristol City have also been among his suitors.

Celtic meanwhile, are also thought to be interested in Cox's teammate, teenage defender Sean Morrison.

Leicester though have made plain their interest, Mandaric saying: “He is a quality player and Nigel (Pearson, manager) and his staff think highly of him.

“We are interested but we are facing competition. He is on a shortlist.

“We are at a time when we are approaching that situation and I think we should know more in a few days.”

Meanwhile, Fitton has confirmed that defender Lescinel Jean-Francois has agreed the terms of a new contract, but has not yet signed it. Phil Smith and Craig Easton are still mulling over their offers.

http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/swindontown/news/4370540.Cox___the_wanted_man/


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:10:11
My hunch is Swansea or Palace.

No way palace, they are skint.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:18:16
“We have no need to sell him and we have no desire to sell him"

What a sexy sentence.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:18:18
Quote
“We have no need to sell him and we have no desire to sell him, but equally it’s part of our job to help develop players and then allow them to move at the agreed time.”

See I like the first part of this sentence then it starts to go down hill with the 'but'.
We all know that if the offer is right Mr Cox will no longer be a stfc player.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:22:46
See I like the first part of this sentence then it starts to go down hill with the 'but'.
We all know that if the offer is right Mr Cox will no longer be a stfc player.
Really it's saying 'If you want him, you'll have to match what we want'...I see it as a warning to other clubs that he won't be going on the cheap.

Every player's got their price, I just hope our board has placed a decent one on Simon's head. That said, if this drags out for ages it's going to piss me off if we sell him late July and are having to rush to bring in some kind of replacement.

If Reading want, they can give us Lita, Sodje, and and 500k for Cox, and we'll start to think about it  8)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:29:53
If he had more than a year i dont think fitton would of said that Sippo.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:31:19
is the reading sodje related to tea towel sodje?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:32:37
Think there are 3 or 4 of them in the leagues that are related, not sure if he's one of them though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:33:51
Every player has got his price, Fitton has set Coxy's at a higher level than has been bid, if someone bids £100 million for Gerrard it would be accepted so EVERY player has his price.

I am glad that Fitton has the bollocks to turn down bids that dont match his valuation which in the past Swindon's board has not done and sold players for peanuts.

Nice one Mr Fitton, I respect you.

If no club match our valuation then Cox does not need to be sold and is still under contract for another year so theres no need or rush to sell him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:50:32
If he had more than a year i dont think fitton would of said that Sippo.

I don't get it


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:52:58
Basically if we just said no sorry you aint leaving he would fuck off end of contract for fuckall.If Fitton says the right things saays look we have not had any bids that are suitable etc etc then if he is still here in january he is likely to sign a new contract.

Basically Fitton has to be nice


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, May 15, 2009, 08:53:30
Think there are 3 or 4 of them in the leagues that are related, not sure if he's one of them though.

All brothers. Sam is at Leeds, Efe (a.k.a. Tea-Towel) is at Bury and Akpo at Sheffield Weds.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:01:09
Basically Fitton has to be nice

But nice is rubbish. Why does he not come out and say 'Fuck off you cunts our Cox isn't for sale'.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:03:06
Basically if we just said no sorry you aint leaving he would fuck off end of contract for fuckall.If Fitton says the right things saays look we have not had any bids that are suitable etc etc then if he is still here in january he is likely to sign a new contract.

Basically Fitton has to be nice

Sure I read somewhere that Cox said he'd be happy to sign a new contract if he's still here in August


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:09:25
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/gossip_and_transfers/default.stm

Its hotting up...halfway down the Mail reckon.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:11:55
No way palace, they are skint.

So are Leicester..Warnock is buying 3 new strikers..


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:15:37
Leicester aren't skint. Mandaric has publicly stated he'll make money available


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:22:29
The mail are saying something about cox today. No link sorry


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:42:18
Leicester aren't skint. Mandaric has publicly stated he'll make money available
[/quote

Well..Warnock has been promised funds also...and Leicester are skint,they nearly went bust 3 years back and to be honest we are probably in a better financial situation than them...if they want to throw money about thats up to them..if they go down again which is possible it will all go tits up...they are trying to Cox on the cheap...and i for one dont think he will go there anyway.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:46:26
http://www.lcfc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10274~1532836,00.html

Of course this is a year ago...but not really in a position to buy 2 million pound strikers IMO.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Friday, May 15, 2009, 09:51:42
There reportedly offering close to or over a million for richie wellens of blackpool too, so theres definatly money there


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: land_of_bo on Friday, May 15, 2009, 10:55:49
The Mail are saying Leicester's bid could be scuppered by interest from top flight clubs...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, May 15, 2009, 12:38:30
Let's hope so. The more clubs we can get to bid the better.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Friday, May 15, 2009, 12:39:40
I think we need to wait for Derby & West Brom to enter the race, I'm sure there's a few clubs watching developments, and there are probably 1 or 2 that have asked Mr Fitton to be kept informed, so if Fitton accepts an offer from x club then y club may well come in and match that offer to be able to talk to Cox as well.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Friday, May 15, 2009, 12:46:39
leicester do have money for players leefer.i saw an interview with mandaric and he said funds were available


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ralphy on Friday, May 15, 2009, 13:26:51
Just been going through a load of threads on foxestalk.co.uk and the Leicester fans rate Cox very, very highly.

They are even talking about him using Leicester as a stepping stone to bigger things and an England call up !! soapy tit wank


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Friday, May 15, 2009, 14:22:47
Just been going through a load of threads on foxestalk.co.uk and the Leicester fans rate Cox very, very highly.

They are even talking about him using Leicester as a stepping stone to bigger things and an England call up !! soapy tit wank

That's not too far fetched, didn't Kevin Davies get a call up recently?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Friday, May 15, 2009, 14:24:53
I think that Cox is going to stay.

I have no facts or rumours whatsoever to back it up, it's just a hunch but I think that he will stay in the hope of playing championship football the season after next with STFC.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Friday, May 15, 2009, 15:48:11
That's not too far fetched, didn't Kevin Davies get a call up recently?

Exactly what I was trying to say a few days ago when I said bids of under 3.5 million should be rejected.
If the Arse can pay Southampscum 12 million for Walcott to warm the bench for years what is Cox really worth.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Friday, May 15, 2009, 15:54:36
So you want to compare cox to one of the prem league top goal scorers and theo walcot. Get a grip


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 16:24:03
leicester do have money for players leefer.i saw an interview with mandaric and he said funds were available

They may have funds available....didnt say they hadnt,but the fact is they are SKINT and wont have enough for Cox...most clubs have funds available for players,but have to cut there cloth accordingly..i bet they havnt even offered a million.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Friday, May 15, 2009, 16:32:31
They may have funds available....didnt say they hadnt,but the fact is they are SKINT and wont have enough for Cox...most clubs have funds available for players,but have to cut there cloth accordingly..i bet they havnt even offered a million.

Mandaric told Pearson there is £10m to spend on transfers. And he's been spending the dosh already. 400k for Jack Hobbs, 200k for Wayne Brown, about to sign Danny N'Guessan for a fee that will be set by tribunal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, May 15, 2009, 18:24:40
£400,000 for Jack Hobbs was a good bit of dealing.

N'Guessan will be a flop.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Friday, May 15, 2009, 18:33:47
Exactly what I was trying to say a few days ago when I said bids of under 3.5 million should be rejected.
If the Arse can pay Southampscum 12 million for Walcott to warm the bench for years what is Cox really worth.

You can't really compare Cox an Walcott. Whilst Walcott was still a bit of a rough diamond when he went to Arsenal, the potential was there for all to see - you can't say the same about Cox. Sure Cox scores a lot of goals and shows the occasional flash of brilliance, but its still a big jump to someone of Walcott's world class quality.

Maybe, in cloud cuckoo land, the bidding for Cox could hit £4 million but hell will freeze over before it goes above that. Best case scenario is £2 million, at which point we should bite their hands off and take the deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 19:34:21
Mandaric told Pearson there is £10m to spend on transfers. And he's been spending the dosh already. 400k for Jack Hobbs, 200k for Wayne Brown, about to sign Danny N'Guessan for a fee that will be set by tribunal.

So 600,000...wow,if you believe Leicester are going to spend 10 million,i would be looking at something abit more shinier than those 3 diamonds!...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Friday, May 15, 2009, 19:58:27
So 600,000...wow,if you believe Leicester are going to spend 10 million,i would be looking at something abit more shinier than those 3 diamonds!...
They have plenty more on their shortlist (including Cox).
The problem Leicester have is that unless they become a stable Premiership club, when Mandaric decides to call it a day they'll be back in financial meltdown. They're making heavy losses every year, and he won't be paying them off forever. It's another reason why I'm so grateful for having Fitton & Co in charge here.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 20:11:43
I may have to eat humble pie on this....but i cant see them paying what we want for Cox,i think they may struggle next year..i go to Leicester alot and half the fans dont like the manager..anyway chap ime hoping we offer him big bucks to stay for another season.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Friday, May 15, 2009, 20:31:57
I hope so too Leefer, I really do. But you can't deny a player the opportunity to go onto bigger and better things these days. And Cox sounds like the type of guy who wants to get to the Premiership for 'the flashy motors and the mansions' as soon as possible, so I can't see him being willing to stay another year. I really hope that I'm proved wrong though. Whatever happens I just hope it's sorted ASAP, Fitton can't afford to sell him too long down the line and leave us with little time to replace him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 20:35:36
Also with only one year left weve got to cash in,i reckon it will be around 1.5 million.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindon-chap on Friday, May 15, 2009, 20:38:26
I'm hoping for a little more than that. About £2m and I would accept it with no hesitation at all.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Friday, May 15, 2009, 20:41:48
I think Fitton would too...lets hope its not one of these undisclosed deals!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: IC89 on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 12:39:02
Hello

Leicester fan here, I have been reading up on your views of Cox, and I just wanted to put in my two pennies worth.

Firstly, it is quite right that you should be looking for as much as possible. Cox is an exceptional striker at this level, and you should try and get the biggest fee and sell on clause possible.

As for us, well a lot of our fans do rate Cox highly, he was awesome when you outplayed us at the Walkers Stadium last season. I personally would like to see him. Fryatt was awful at CCC level, and to rely on him and the ageing Howard would be tough, we would love to see Cox here.

Fee? well I think that if Pearson was desperate enough, he would get Mandaric to pay £2m for him. We will pay that. I am baffled that we seem to have a lot of money, but Milan has and is making money, from a combo of his own money, season ticket sales and TV money, available.

Of course, that £2m may not be enough to secure his signature, as you may (rightly) demand more.

We don't need that many players really. We want to keep the squad as settled as possible, so it is feasable that we will be going for Quality rather than quantity, and as you know, Cox is quality.

If we do get him (and one of the insiders at the club says the deal is 80% done, though i'd take that with a pinch of salt after the story of your chairman rejecting bids) then I am sure there will be a 20% sell on clause in the contract.

I wish you well for next season, especially if you give us your best player  :D

NB: regarding our finances... we did lose £14m last year, but Mandaric will not leave us without making a profit. He will invest heavily, even with his own money, to get us to the Premier League (not that we will get there any time soon  :() so he will spend... problem for us, is that he will sack if he needs to, and Pearson is the best thing to happen to this club in years.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ronnie21 on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 13:18:11
Hello

Leicester fan here, I have been reading up on your views of Cox, and I just wanted to put in my two pennies worth.

Firstly, it is quite right that you should be looking for as much as possible. Cox is an exceptional striker at this level, and you should try and get the biggest fee and sell on clause possible.

As for us, well a lot of our fans do rate Cox highly, he was awesome when you outplayed us at the Walkers Stadium last season. I personally would like to see him. Fryatt was awful at CCC level, and to rely on him and the ageing Howard would be tough, we would love to see Cox here.

Fee? well I think that if Pearson was desperate enough, he would get Mandaric to pay £2m for him. We will pay that. I am baffled that we seem to have a lot of money, but Milan has and is making money, from a combo of his own money, season ticket sales and TV money, available.

Of course, that £2m may not be enough to secure his signature, as you may (rightly) demand more.

We don't need that many players really. We want to keep the squad as settled as possible, so it is feasable that we will be going for Quality rather than quantity, and as you know, Cox is quality.

If we do get him (and one of the insiders at the club says the deal is 80% done, though i'd take that with a pinch of salt after the story of your chairman rejecting bids) then I am sure there will be a 20% sell on clause in the contract.

I wish you well for next season, especially if you give us your best player  :D

NB: regarding our finances... we did lose £14m last year, but Mandaric will not leave us without making a profit. He will invest heavily, even with his own money, to get us to the Premier League (not that we will get there any time soon  :() so he will spend... problem for us, is that he will sack if he needs to, and Pearson is the best thing to happen to this club in years.
I think we will only get two mill. if a bidding war breaks out - and it must be remembered that Coxy has stated that he doesn't want to move too far away from his home in Reading.  He will be a good signing for any championship club although I have a few reservations as to wether he will go further than that, his inability at times to control the ball wil eventually let him down.  Other than that he has been a pleasure to watch and although I would love him to stay, wish him good luck wherever he moves on to.  Sadly I believe we have a 30% sell on fee to pay to Reading, so it will have to be a good offer to tempt us.  Best scenario for us is to persuade him to sign an improved contract, another season in league 1 learning his trade and then sell him off at the end of next season if we don't achieve championship football - and I am not expecting us to do so.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 13:25:59
£2m sounds fair to me too.

Also not sure he's ready for the top level. Things that will currently stop Cox getting to the prem:
-Suspect first touch
-Missed sitters (!)
-Not quite got the killer pace over the first 5 yards.

Sounds like I'm picking holes in a player who is clearly miles to good to stay in our team. I'm not! His work rate, vision, technique, goals and more goals should be more than enough to take him through the transition to championship football. Then he can work on his weaknesses and we'll see if he can step up again.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 13:26:49
I thought he meant we would put a sell on clause in if we sold him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC G-DOGG on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 14:36:32
Big clubs are willing to pay big money for top quality young players, like coxy. however, when a club like swindon in league one are offered 2 mil for one player, the tempation to accept such a lot of money is too much to resist. for all we know, cox could be at his peak in a years time and end up another flop with huge promise. danny wilson should snatch any offer at 2 mil or above while he has the chance, and maybe go into non league for a potential replacement. (andy mangan of forest green is always worth a try)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 14:50:48
Nah, I'm going to stick to what I think is fair & that's 3.5 Million. I didn't say he was better or as good as Walcott, but if the Arse can pay 12 mill for someone to warm the bench we can demand 3.5 mill for Coxy.
Still I'm not the chairman, but if he goes for any less I would want a real good sell on clause.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC G-DOGG on Saturday, May 16, 2009, 14:53:09
3.5 mil probably is fair, but we arent gonna get it no matter what clubs bid for coxy. swindon will cave into a bid around the 2 mil mark, and DW wont really have much of a say in the matter.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Monday, May 18, 2009, 15:49:47
Thats where I beg to differ. Remember Diamandis has gone & we now have a decent board in place. Of couse AF will be swayed by a bid of 2 mill, but he will also know that with the number of clubs interested he could hold out for more & get it. If not Coxy stays & hopefully signs a new contract, increasing his value next season even more.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: RobertT on Monday, May 18, 2009, 18:39:22
I think £2m would be more than enough to turn our Boards collective heads.  Lets not forget our place in the food chain here, that's around 40% of our turnover in a good year.  Granted we won't keep it all, but we are in no position to be turning down bids that cover 2 years Season tickets proceeds, especially when all and sundry are being released on free's as clubs finally seem to be reigning in the budgets.

Another factor is Fitton's desire to create a sort of Crewe style acamdemy style club, bringing on youngsters and selling them for profit.  To do that, we need to show players we'll give them a chance to shine, and when they do and decent enough clubs and bids come in, we'll let them go.  If we frustrate Cox, then other players will be much more wary about signing on permanently.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Monday, May 18, 2009, 18:54:23
If we can bank a million after all other dues are paid then I'd be satisfied, anything over that would be a bonus.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 18, 2009, 19:16:48
If we can bank a million after all other dues are paid then I'd be satisfied, anything over that would be a bonus.
Anything less would be a joke.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: axs on Monday, May 18, 2009, 19:19:49
Anything less would be a joke.

But to get that much we'll be verging on a £2m fee.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 18, 2009, 19:29:32
Correct axs....its about time this club showed its balls regarding transfer fees,we dont need to sell,hes under contract,if he has to stay another year because we refuse offers so be it...we get him for another season,and with him we have a sniff of the championship...and who knows he may decide to give it another season with us if we make the promised land.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: nochee on Monday, May 18, 2009, 19:50:53
with him we have a sniff of the championship...and who knows he may decide to give it another season with us if we make the promised land.

I do like what you are saying but dont forget we need to sort out the players behind him to get any sort of look in at promotion.

Cox could not have done much more for us this past season and we still only just hung on. Lets not get carried away with CCC talk just yet.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: michael on Monday, May 18, 2009, 22:39:01
Nah, I'm going to stick to what I think is fair & that's 3.5 Million. I didn't say he was better or as good as Walcott, but if the Arse can pay 12 mill for someone to warm the bench we can demand 3.5 mill for Coxy.
Still I'm not the chairman, but if he goes for any less I would want a real good sell on clause.


But Arsenal didn't pay £12m for Walcott, they paid about £5m.

Which makes £1.5m for Cox an excellent price for all parties involved :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Westwood on Monday, May 18, 2009, 22:49:36
if we can sell Lucas Jucawatsit and Tozer for a million then 1.5 is far too cheap.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 00:28:41
But Arsenal didn't pay £12m for Walcott, they paid about £5m.

It was more than that. The initial deal was for £5m, rising to £12m based on club / international appearances and other such stuff. Except as Southampton were broke they cut a deal with Arsenal two years after the transfer, for a lower but immediate payment and the final price was £9m.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 07:09:18
Swindon Town warned Celtic they will have to double their offer to land prolific striker Simon Cox.
Sportsmail understands that the Parkhead club approached the League One side with a package worth around £1.2million for Cox, plus teenage central defender Sean Morrison.
With a raft of English Premier and Championship clubs also interested in 36-goal striker Cox, however, Swindon rejected the proposal before slapping a £2.5m price-tag on the pair.
Chairman Andrew Fitton believes Champions League football would be a fitting stage for 22-year-old Cox, in particular.
 Wanted: Celtic are keen to land Swindon's prolific striker Simon Cox but have been told to double their bid if they are serious
Adamant that he is in no rush to sell a player he signed for just £200,000 from Reading last summer, however, Fitton said: 'We value Simon at £2.5m. We have made no secret of what we think his value is.
'I'm not surprised Celtic's interest is not going away because Simon is a class player. We have had two approaches from clubs, but nothing in writing.'
   More...Celts hit the wall: Caldwell blames negative Hibs for costly title slip
Kit parade: Celtic join Toon, City, Chelsea, Liverpool, United and Arsenal
CELTIC FC NEWS FROM ACROSS THE WEB
Celtic have yet to declare their hand on the future of Jan Vennegoor of Hesselink, with PSV interested in taking the Dutchman back to his homeland, but interest in Cox suggests there will be places up for grabs irrespective of this weekend's SPL climax.
'There is interest from one club in England. But what they cannot offer the player, unlike Celtic, is European football and playing in front of crowds of 60,000,' said Fitton.
Celtic have also enquired over 19-year-old defender Morrison.
Swindon recently had a bid of around £80,000 for Celtic defender Scott Cuthbert - who is on loan at St Mirren - rejected and a swap deal for the duo remains an option.
Another Parkhead loan star Paul McGowan, meanwhile, has warned Hamilton teammate James McCarthy to think carefully before holding out for a move to his boyhood idols.
 Target man: Hamilton rejected Celtic's bid for rising star James McCarthy
Celtic bid £500,000 for the Hamilton prospect last week and are expected to return with an increased offer after manager Gordon Strachan confirmed his interest in the player.
McGowan fears McCarthy could struggle for first-team football at Parkhead, saying: 'James is young and needs to be playing football. It certainly wouldn't be a bad thing if he stayed at Hamilton.
'I'm sure he is good enough to make it at Celtic but it can be difficult - you just have to look at what happened to Derek Riordan.'
Meanwhile, Celtic coach Neil Lennon assured worried fans last night that Scott Brown should be okay for Sunday's vital home clash with Hearts - and allayed fears that he may need surgery.
The Scotland midfielder has been struggling with an ankle injury and was substituted in the closing stages of the 0-0 draw against Hibernian at Easter Road.
But Lennon told Celtic TV: 'Scott should be ready for the weekend, but he won't do a lot this week.
'He has had an ongoing ankle problem, but he had been getting through okay, although he struggled a bit in the last 20 minutes against HIbs.
'Hopefully, after a week's rest he should be OK. I wouldn't have thought it would go as far as an operation.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1184354/Celtic-told-double-bid-land-Swindon-striker-Simon-Cox.html?ITO=1490


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 07:17:18
Quote
Swindon rejected the proposal before slapping a £2.5m price-tag on the pair.

Quote
We value Simon at £2.5m. We have made no secret of what we think his value is.

So is it 2.5 mil for Cox, or 2.5 Mil for both?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 07:19:02
imagine 2.5 for Cox to be honest.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: stfctownenda on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 07:26:36
Sounds like he is saying 2.5million for Cox which is very encouraging, I would of been quite happy at 2 million but 2.5 million would be a great deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Summerof69 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 08:35:49
I cannot believe the cheek of Celtic £1.2m for Cox and Morrison. They got to be havin' a laugh !!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:07:01
I cannot believe the cheek of Celtic £1.2m for Cox and Morrison. They got to be havin' a laugh !!!

Will scare those big boys from Leicester off then!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:10:36
As someone else said to me, we should sell Coxy and Morrison to Celtic for a combined fee of 2.5 million.

2 Million for Morrison, 500,000 for Cox. Stitch up Reading's sell on clause!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:11:30
As someone else said to me, we should sell Coxy and Morrison to Celtic for a combined fee of 2.5 million.

2 Million for Morrison, 500,000 for Cox. Stitch up Reading's sell on clause!!

That's a cracking idea... i wonder if Fitton has thought of that?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:14:50
That would be an excellent way of making sure we never sign a player from Reading again.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Chubbs on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:14:50
That's a cracking idea... i wonder if Fitton has thought of that?

sod that 2.5mill for morrison and throw cox in a a freebie. a gesture of good will.
:-)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Weasel on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:15:58
As someone else said to me, we should sell Coxy and Morrison to Celtic for a combined fee of 2.5 million.

2 Million for Morrison, 500,000 for Cox. Stitch up Reading's sell on clause!!

or 2.35m for Morrison and throw in Coxy for free... we'd still end up 50k better off and Reading get nothing....



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Maguire11 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:17:40
let celtic sign cox on a freebie but they have to sign Yinka Casal for 2.5million, both parties win then.
we get rid of more deadwood and loads of cash and celtic get Cox on the cheap.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:19:38
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1184354/Celtic-told-double-bid-land-Swindon-striker-Simon-Cox.html

Just to confirm what a few other TEFFERS have posted...ime begining to really warm to Mr Fitton.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Luci on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:26:00
can someone post the content in here? :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:26:17
That's a cracking idea... i wonder if Fitton has thought of that?

If I were a betting man, I'd say he had...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:27:20
Swap Cox for Jan Vennegoor of Hesselink.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:39:13
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1184354/Celtic-told-double-bid-land-Swindon-striker-Simon-Cox.html



can someone post the content in here? :D

Quote
Swindon Town warned Celtic they will have to double their offer to land prolific striker Simon Cox.

Sportsmail understands that the Parkhead club approached the League One side with a package worth around £1.2million for Cox, plus teenage central defender Sean Morrison.

With a raft of English Premier and Championship clubs also interested in 36-goal striker Cox, however, Swindon rejected the proposal before slapping a £2.5m price-tag on the pair.

Chairman Andrew Fitton believes Champions League football would be a fitting stage for 22-year-old Cox, in particular.
Wanted: Celtic are keen to land Swindon's prolific striker Simon Cox but have been told to double their bid if they are serious

Wanted: Celtic are keen to land Swindon's prolific striker Simon Cox but have been told to double their bid if they are serious

Adamant that he is in no rush to sell a player he signed for just £200,000 from Reading last summer, however, Fitton said: 'We value Simon at £2.5m. We have made no secret of what we think his value is.

'I'm not surprised Celtic's interest is not going away because Simon is a class player. We have had two approaches from clubs, but nothing in writing.'
 
 
More...

    * Celts hit the wall: Caldwell blames negative Hibs for costly title slip
    * Kit parade: Celtic join Toon, City, Chelsea, Liverpool, United and Arsenal
    * CELTIC FC NEWS FROM ACROSS THE WEB

Celtic have yet to declare their hand on the future of Jan Vennegoor of Hesselink, with PSV interested in taking the Dutchman back to his homeland, but interest in Cox suggests there will be places up for grabs irrespective of this weekend's SPL climax.

'There is interest from one club in England. But what they cannot offer the player, unlike Celtic, is European football and playing in front of crowds of 60,000,' said Fitton.

Celtic have also enquired over 19-year-old defender Morrison.

Swindon recently had a bid of around £80,000 for Celtic defender Scott Cuthbert - who is on loan at St Mirren - rejected and a swap deal for the duo remains an option.

Another Parkhead loan star Paul McGowan, meanwhile, has warned Hamilton teammate James McCarthy to think carefully before holding out for a move to his boyhood idols.
Target man: Hamilton rejected Celtic's bid for rising star James McCarthy

Target man: Hamilton rejected Celtic's bid for rising star James McCarthy

Celtic bid £500,000 for the Hamilton prospect last week and are expected to return with an increased offer after manager Gordon Strachan confirmed his interest in the player.

McGowan fears McCarthy could struggle for first-team football at Parkhead, saying: 'James is young and needs to be playing football. It certainly wouldn't be a bad thing if he stayed at Hamilton.

'I'm sure he is good enough to make it at Celtic but it can be difficult - you just have to look at what happened to Derek Riordan.'

Meanwhile, Celtic coach Neil Lennon assured worried fans last night that Scott Brown should be okay for Sunday's vital home clash with Hearts - and allayed fears that he may need surgery.

The Scotland midfielder has been struggling with an ankle injury and was substituted in the closing stages of the 0-0 draw against Hibernian at Easter Road.

But Lennon told Celtic TV: 'Scott should be ready for the weekend, but he won't do a lot this week.

'He has had an ongoing ankle problem, but he had been getting through okay, although he struggled a bit in the last 20 minutes against HIbs.

'Hopefully, after a week's rest he should be OK. I wouldn't have thought it would go as far as an operation.'

it's a bit all over the place.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Chubbs on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:46:23
Swap Cox for Jan Vennegoor of Hesselink.
nah whilst at celtic JVOH has scored 34 in 74
cox is 35 in 62 (not including the loan period)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:55:11
nah whilst at celtic JVOH has scored 34 in 74
cox is 35 in 62 (not including the loan period)

And of course against much tougher opposition!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 11:55:54
But you've got to remember, Cox had better players around him


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ahounsell on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 17:56:59
As someone else said to me, we should sell Coxy and Morrison to Celtic for a combined fee of 2.5 million.

2 Million for Morrison, 500,000 for Cox. Stitch up Reading's sell on clause!!

The only problem with this ruse is that is seriously undervalues Morrison.

I really dont think people appreciate what a valuable asset we have there. There are some seriously big clubs taking an interest in his progress, and Celtic are not the biggest of them.

Personally I would put fair value for Cox at £1.5m, but given the number of clubs interested Fitton is quite right to wait and see the colour of their money before he is prepared to do business. If we play our cards right we could get £2m or even £2.5m although I dont see it going higher than that.

With another season of first team footbal behind him I believe Morrison could fetch a similar fee on his own in a years time.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 17:59:57
The only problem with this ruse is that is seriously undervalues Morrison.

I really dont think people appreciate what a valuable asset we have there. There are some seriously big clubs taking an interest in his progress, and Celtic are not the biggest of them.

Personally I would put fair value for Cox at £1.5m, but given the number of clubs interested Fitton is quite right to wait and see the colour of their money before he is prepared to do business. If we play our cards right we could get £2m or even £2.5m although I dont see it going higher than that.

With another season of first team footbal behind him I believe Morrison could fetch a similar fee on his own in a years time.


Exactly...spot on....dont need to sell.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:05:04
Dont wish too long, wait until early June, the serious bids will come in when all the laddies have had a break - chairman, players, managers.

Cox is a gonner.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:23:23
We know what morrison would be worth but would the tribunal?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:27:59
Wouldn't any tribunal money for Morrison be cut down because we nicked him off plymouth? It's supposed to be compensation for developing players isn't it?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:38:06
was he realeased from pmuff or did we nab him?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:50:04
Released i think


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 18:58:18
Wouldn't any tribunal money for Morrison be cut down because we nicked him off plymouth? It's supposed to be compensation for developing players isn't it?

That isn't how it works in England (it does work differently under FIFA/UEFA rules though), this is from the Football League website (the Premier League are signed up to it as well) - how the tribunal sets fees for players under the age of 24:

Quote
In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:09:22
we didnt steal Morrison from Plymouth, hes wasnt contracted to Plymouth he was playing for the college which had a link up with Plymouth academy i think, bit like how New College have their best players playing for Supermarine.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:20:30
But the fact he hasn't been with us that long would still affect how much we'd get under the rules jonny72 posted wouldn't it? We'd certainly get less from a tribunal than we would if we sold him properly?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:22:51
why are we talking about tribunal when hes under contract?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:23:22
I'm not sure.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:24:23
the under 24 rule applies when they are out of contract


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:27:56
I think everybody knows that.

Does his contract run out next year? Were we discussing cashing in now instead of waiting a year?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:28:24
Yes....I think the original point from jonny72 was we dont have to sell Morrison this summer.

the counter point was, well if we dont sell him this summer than next year he will be out of contract which is where the under 24 tribunal rules kick in.

what with Morrison having only been here for what 2, 2 and a half years we wont be credited with much of his development and we wont get much money for him that.

If it was a direct choice between the two financially wise we'd be better of selling him. Of course the best solution would have been to get him to sign a long term contract last year but for whatever reason that didnt come back

well thats how i've read it anyway


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:29:27
Yes....I think the original point from jonny72 was we dont have to sell Morrison this summer.

the counter point was, well if we dont sell him this summer than next year he will be out of contract which is where the under 24 tribunal rules kick in.

what with Morrison having only been here for what 2, 2 and a half years we wont be credited with much of his development and we wont get much money for him that.

If it was a direct choice between the two financially wise we'd be better of selling him. Of course the best solution would have been to get him to sign a long term contract last year but for whatever reason that didnt come back

well thats how i've read it anyway
oh ok i didnt really read all of it, goes back to same arguement of why we didnt offer him a longer deal


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:29:36
Not enough manatees.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:30:17
oh ok i didnt really read all of it, goes back to same arguement of why we didnt offer him a longer deal

....or why didnt Morrison want a longer deal?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:32:09
if he was offered a longer deal he would have signed it, same with Lloyd, yet we give them 1 year deals and will lose out in the long run


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:42:49
Do you know that a fact


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:44:36
Do you know that a fact

i know for a fact only 1 year deals were offered, same with Callum


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:48:36
Fair enough


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:48:57
Do you think that you are sometimes a bit trusting of what you are told?

I've got a mate who works in an office somewhere I can't remember. He was chatting to me on msn on his blackberry one day and told me he'd spotted a bird with the most amazing tits ever, yet he refused to follow her around for a bit and get a couple of phone camera snaps because he was scared that he might get fired. I remain suspicious of the possibility that the wonderfulness of the tits was exaggerated somewhat.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:51:15
i know for a fact only 1 year deals were offered, same with Callum

Sure it said on the O/S that Macklin was given a 2 yr deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: girlyred on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:57:08
Sean Morrison was with Plymouth Argyles U16 youth side he was released along with many of that side when Mike Pejik arrived, Dave Burns who knew him from Argyle offered him along with Tozer and Joyce a apprentiship with STFC :(


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:58:03
Do you think that you are sometimes a bit trusting of what you are told?

I've got a mate who works in an office somewhere I can't remember. He was chatting to me on msn on his blackberry one day and told me he'd spotted a bird with the most amazing tits ever, yet he refused to follow her around for a bit and get a couple of phone camera snaps because he was scared that he might get fired. I remain suspicious of the possibility that the wonderfulness of the tits was exaggerated somewhat.

im only saying what im told, true or not i dont know


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 19:59:09
if he was offered a longer deal he would have signed it, same with Lloyd, yet we give them 1 year deals and will lose out in the long run

Not really. Chris Allen, Ben Joyce, Tom Evans, Sam Morris, Jake Hyde. The number released far outweighs the number who stayed on.

The current youth players will probably sign new deals, and if they dont we will still get compensation if other clubs sign them.

Only thing I would say is that football nowadays does miss out on the late developers.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 20:01:24
Not really. Chris Allen, Ben Joyce, Tom Evans, Sam Morris, Jake Hyde. The number released far outweighs the number who stayed on.

The current youth players will probably sign new deals, and if they dont we will still get compensation if other clubs sign them.

Only thing I would say is that football nowadays does miss out on the late developers.

but Morrison & Macklin are 2 of the best players we have had through the youth team in a long long time, Hyde Morris etc had no business being given contracts in the first place were never good enough


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 22:19:39
Yes....I think the original point from jonny72 was we dont have to sell Morrison this summer.

the counter point was, well if we dont sell him this summer than next year he will be out of contract which is where the under 24 tribunal rules kick in.

what with Morrison having only been here for what 2, 2 and a half years we wont be credited with much of his development and we wont get much money for him that.

If it was a direct choice between the two financially wise we'd be better of selling him. Of course the best solution would have been to get him to sign a long term contract last year but for whatever reason that didnt come back

well thats how i've read it anyway

No good young player will sign a long term deal now...they are advised by there agents...all clubs have people involved who are involved in SPIN..like politicians they are at the club mainly to spout rumours and counter rumours its nothing new..my dad was a pro and it happened in his time as well..in those days injuries were different and not treatable like todays..so a good player carrying a bad injury would be circulated to other clubs,they would sign him more or less unaware they were getting a dud...not many youths make the grade now with there hometown clubs...Ryan Giggs was at Man City for years before going to Man U...its all fate and luck...Crewe tried it for years,ware are they now?
Plymouth and Southampton have spent small fortunes on developing youth..look at them..is it really worth the gamble,have they benefited,maybe getting dosh in for them has kept them afloat but not braught success...ime hoping for the first time in years theres no pressure on us to sell,if we do its got to be for the right price for us.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spy on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 09:56:29
Do you think that you are sometimes a bit trusting of what you are told?

I've got a mate who works in an office somewhere I can't remember. He was chatting to me on msn on his blackberry one day and told me he'd spotted a bird with the most amazing tits ever, yet he refused to follow her around for a bit and get a couple of phone camera snaps because he was scared that he might get fired. I remain suspicious of the possibility that the wonderfulness of the tits was exaggerated somewhat.

 :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 11:54:24
My point was actually that we won't get as screwed over by a tribunal as some people think we will and that we won't have to share that money with any other clubs (ie Plymouth). He's been with us for a few years and is likely to have played a lot of games by the time his contract is up next summer, add on us then offering a decent contract and we should do ok from a tribunal - especially if he goes to a big club.

I don't see why it should come to that though - he could have walked this summer if he wanted, by not signing a new contract. Plus with a number of clubs already interested if he does want to go we should be able to sort out a decent deal with one of them without it going to tribunal. Who knows, he might sign a longer contract over the summer?

I still think he will be bloody stupid to want to leave. The last two youth players to leave have disappeared off the map, if they'd stayed at Swindon they'd likely be 1st team regulars and playing lots of games just as Morisson will next season. He'll learn a lot more and get a lot better by playing a season or two alongside Greer.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 11:57:33
I think we should have a squad of two players next year and keep Cox and Morrison as those two.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 13:48:30
Not sure if this has been posted elsewhere yet

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/8059535.stm

"Meanwhile, a Celtic source told BBC Scotland that, despite recent reports, the club had not made enquiries about Hearts midfielder Bruno Aguiar, Austrian striker Mark Janko, or Swindon forward Simon Cox.

Earlier on Wednesday Cox's agent, Alex Cowdy, told BBC Scotland that Celtic and Leicester City had both had offers rejected for the 22-year-old.

"Throughout the season, there have been a lot of clubs watching Simon, including Celtic," said Cowdy.

"As far as I understand, there have been two offers put to Swindon that have been rejected - an offer from Celtic and an offer from Leicester City.

"The Swindon chairman has come out in the press and said that Simon remains a Swindon player and it's going to take something special to get him away from the club and I think he values Simon at around £2.5m.

"But Simon has made no secret that he would like to play at the highest level and Celtic come into that bracket."

Cox has another year of his contract to run, but his agent believes he would score at the top level, having netted 32 times this season despite playing in a side that this season struggled to avoid relegation from England's League One. "


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 13:57:15
Saw that on the BBC, tagged onto a direct denial by Celtic that they had made an offer, so not sure what to believe there, i guess wait and see.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 16:27:01
fucking agent saying its hard to imagine how many he would have scored in a team that wasnt struggling. we were only struggling because our defence was so shit.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 16:31:29
How many goals did we get from midfield? Genuine question.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 16:37:54
Top of my head, HRK-6 OTJ-1  Timlin 1 or 2 Macca-0, Peacock-2 thats about it i think


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 16:39:27
Agent trying to arrange a move for Cox then?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 16:40:24
Well OTJ got one, Kanu got 3 or 4, Peacock a couple I think, Timlin a couple I think, JPM prob about 3 - not many more than that I don't suppose, could really do with a midfielder bagging 10 next season, Grant Smith made a real difference once he found his shooting boots in the play off season.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:04:30
League only:

Kanu 4
Peackock 2
Easton 2
Timlin 2
McGovern 2
Tudur Jones 1


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:19:57
Thats fuckin awful


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:25:03
Well OTJ got one, Kanu got 3 or 4, Peacock a couple I think, Timlin a couple I think, JPM prob about 3 - not many more than that I don't suppose, could really do with a midfielder bagging 10 next season, Grant Smith made a real difference once he found his shooting boots in the play off season.

Smith didn't score 10 goals until the season after we made the play-offs. He barely featured that season actually.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:31:40
Smith didn't score 10 goals until the season after we made the play-offs. He barely featured that season actually.

 Correctomundo....if Sniff had any sense, he'd have realised that Kingy had made him a player, and stayed at STFC.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:32:42
So a few more goals from midfield, a tighter defence and a 15-20 goal/season replacement for Cox and we could more than compensate for losing Cox's goals.

But then I'm just spouting rhetoric really innit!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:37:32
I reckon we are interested in Theo Robinson as a replacement for Cox. He's young and his record is similar to Cox's before he joined us on loan. Interesting. I can't see any other reason Fitton would claim interest in a player but not launch a bid.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:37:51
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/8059272.stm

Audio of the radio interview with BBC Scotland.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:39:25
Smith didn't score 10 goals until the season after we made the play-offs. He barely featured that season actually.

Of course you're right... still my point remains, if you can get one midfielder bagging 10 then it's a major bonus


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:40:14
Of course you're right... still my point remains, if you can get one midfielder bagging 10 then it's a major bonus

Deffo Tom. We haven't had once since Smith by all accounts.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:47:54
Of course you're right... still my point remains, if you can get one midfielder bagging 10 then it's a major bonus

Why do those goals have to come from just one player?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 17:49:00
Defenders could also chip in in a well organised team. Look at how many Oooh Shaun Taylor used top put away for us.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 18:04:42
Defenders could also chip in in a well organised team. Look at how many Oooh Shaun Taylor used top put away for us.

Don't forget Morrison scored a well taken goal. Though I still don't understand what the fuck he was doing on the edge of the area when the ball came to him. Very cool finish for a 18 year old defender in one of his first games.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 18:06:15
Jack Smith was our third top scorer in the league with 5 (2 were penalties).
Amankwaah got 2 but I think 1 was from right wing.
Morrison got 1
Ifil got 1
Greer got 1

Edit: Forgot Kanyuka scored 1 too


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 18:11:41
Defenders could also chip in in a well organised team. Look at how many Oooh Shaun Taylor used top put away for us.

That promotion season saw Maskell, Mitchell, White, Bodin and Taylor all get double figures (I think).


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 18:55:13
Having said that, when we were promoted from league two Roberts and Peacock both had 10 and the rest were all 2's, 3's and 4's with Jutkiewicz getting 5. Hardly amazing, we just had a good defence.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 19:10:40
Why do those goals have to come from just one player?

Just because you can usually rely on most midfielders to get 2 or 3 a season meaning that you'd maybe get 10-15 out of an average midfield, if you had one getting 10 on his own you'd be up to 20-25, it would be harder to get 5 or 6 goals from every midfielder, so one with an eye for goal is a big, big bonus.  That's how I see it anyway...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Thursday, May 21, 2009, 07:44:09
This whole saga is boring me now. Is the adver going to print the 'same' story every day?!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 21, 2009, 08:00:28
Danny Wilson is/was on holiday they should of done a diary of his trip.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spy on Thursday, May 21, 2009, 08:38:18
This whole saga is boring me now. Is the adver going to print the 'same' story every day?!

Exactly thats what I said about a week ago. What if he doesn't go for a few weeks. Are then still going to run a Cox story every day? (answer - yes)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, May 21, 2009, 08:42:07
Solution- DONT FUCKING READ IT THEN


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, May 21, 2009, 08:44:26
To be fair, most local rags switch to Cricket for their sports sections in the summer, the adver don't really have that option- only so many articles one can run on Liam Dawson and Jon Lewis.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:16:46
Now Newcastle have bitten the dust they may renew interest in Cox....Martins,Ameobi,Owen,Viduka wont want championship football...maybe a swop deal?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:20:55
Solution- DONT FUCKING READ IT THEN

I don't, but some cunt called News Monkey keeps posting the shit up on here, so it's kinda difficult to avoid.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:22:13
Now Newcastle have bitten the dust they may renew interest in Cox....Martins,Ameobi,Owen,Viduka wont want championship football...maybe a swop deal?

they wont want championship football but will play in league one? what planet you on? :-)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:24:16
they wont want championship football but will play in league one? what planet you on? :-)

I meant a a younger player not one of those you muppett


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:30:30
They have a big squad Chubbs bound to have to get rid of some...maybe a chance to get a few of them in on the cheap...obviously not those i mentioned.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 19:40:44
I don't, but some cunt called News Monkey keeps posting the shit up on here, so it's kinda difficult to avoid.

What the fuck happened to the future news Monkey? I thought that he came back from Brizzle already.

Fucking pirates.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: monkey on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 20:18:05
you are all cunts.  cunty cunts


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 20:27:26
Ameobi

I don't think he has a choice.

Their relegation will benefit Andrew Carroll and no doubt Nile Ranger.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Chubbs on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 20:42:12
i can see newcastle playing the whole of the season with a team made up of predominantly youngsters with the odd 33+er
Saying that they do have a lot of up and comming youngsters
Carol, Ranger, Kadar, Tozer, Danquah, Ngo Baheng, Krul, Lua Lua amongst others who would be able to cut it in the Championship


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 20:44:31
Newcastle would be a good move for Cox - plus I think we'd get the desired fee too.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Future News Monkey on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 21:54:00
you are all cunts.  cunty cunts

Who the fuck are you?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 22:31:16
Newcastle would be a good move for Cox - plus I think we'd get the desired fee too.
Apart from the wages any player going near Newcastle needs a lobotony. They are an absolute fucking car crash and a players graveyard - apart from the money.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 22:32:19
True, but ultimately I couldn't care less where he went as long as we got a good fee. Prefer it if he stayed obviously.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Sunday, May 24, 2009, 22:37:26
Agreed. The only thing about it is the fee. I'd like to see him do well, but I'd like it even more to maximise the fee for him. If we could convince Toon he was Spanish then we'd be looking £5m plus. As it is he'll probably go to a decent side for £2m.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Monday, May 25, 2009, 09:11:36
Agreed. The only thing about it is the fee. I'd like to see him do well, but I'd like it even more to maximise the fee for him. If we could convince Toon he was Spanish then we'd be looking £5m plus. As it is he'll probably go to a decent side for £2m.

El Cimon ... sorted!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 25, 2009, 10:13:16
Newcastle would be a good move for Cox - plus I think we'd get the desired fee too.

Why didnt i word it like that.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Monday, May 25, 2009, 17:34:05
Agreed. The only thing about it is the fee. I'd like to see him do well, but I'd like it even more to maximise the fee for him. If we could convince Toon he was Spanish then we'd be looking £5m plus. As it is he'll probably go to a decent side for £2m.
:) If we could convince Liverpool he was Spanish, we'd be looking at £12m. Rafa doesn't do deals under 10m, it's beneath his dignity and he'd be worried Alex might laugh at him


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:07:53
Strachan looks odds on for Sunderland....will Cox be following him i wonder..they have loads of money now so possibly would get a better deal than if he went to Celtic.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:11:08
Its bloody cold up in that north country, Coxy is a southerner through and through, not sure he would want to move his family to one of the ugliest places on earth.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:18:02
This not moving stuff is bollocks. Cox will go where he thinks he will progress


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:19:43
Do you think he may progress with us DRS.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:21:13
This not moving stuff is bollocks. Cox will go where he thinks he will progress

 :no: - Midlands he might, up tut north and into heathen land he wont.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:27:22
I think he could leefer but doubt it. Dell if celtic offer what we want cox would crawl there imo


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: RobertT on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:27:58
He'll go where the money or opportunities lead him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:30:29
He would freeze his nuts off up there on the bench. No-way will he go to Celtic to do that. Cox will only move to a side who guarantees him first team football.

Leicester, QPR, maybe WBA and of course Reading.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:36:14
I think he could leefer but doubt it. Dell if celtic offer what we want cox would crawl there imo

Agree as Champions lge footy will attract any player....cos most teams who play champions lge have to rotate the squad and he will play.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:36:52
Agree as Champions lge footy will attract any player....cos most teams who play champions lge have to rotate the squad and he will play.
They are not in the Champions League!!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:37:18
Qualifying rounds surely?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:39:06
Correct Nemo


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:41:24
Yes maybe...but if you bang em in...and Cox will it wont do him any harm....you cant tell me he wont score in the SPL.....stays fit he will run riot.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:43:23
If Coxy goes to the SPL he will be the leagues top scorer remember where you read it,because hes better than Boyd.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:45:40
Ah but as dell said he would rather go to leicester


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:48:49
I stated he was off to Leicester before a bid came in and before it was even mentioned, so lets wait and see.
I will have a bet with anyone who wants it, he will not go to Jock land.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:52:36
If Celtic offer the right amount,hes off Champions League football,his next move then could be even better,because he will score goals.Dell you didnt even realise that Celtic were in the champions league.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:54:45
If Celtic offer the right amount,hes off Champions League football,his next move then could be even better,because he will score goals.Dell you didnt even realise that Celtic were in the champions league.

Sir, they are not, Scotland only have one side who automatically qualify and Rangers have that slot. Celtic will qualify if they win their preliminary round which this year is a hell of a lot harder than normal because it is not seeded.

Please keep up.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:56:24
Correct but they will still play in the competition CL qualifier,still in the comp.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 19:58:37
Sir, they are not, Scotland only have one side who automatically qualify and Rangers have that slot. Celtic will qualify if they win their preliminary round which this year is a hell of a lot harder than normal because it is not seeded.

Please keep up.
Thats like saying the non league teams dont compete in the FA cup,you need to keep up my son.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 20:10:19
Good comparison - Scottish football is for playrs who cant get a game in the Premiership.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 20:15:06
Good comparison - Scottish football is for playrs who cant get a game in the Premiership.
Henrik Larsson,Caldwell Fletcher just to name 3 that played Scottish football.Please keep up.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: dell boy on Monday, May 25, 2009, 20:16:09
Henrik Larsson,Caldwell Fletcher just to name 3 that played Scottish football.Please keep up.

You are too good for me, I think I'll retire and have a lemonade! :bye:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 20:22:00
You are too good for me, I think I'll retire and have a lemonade! :bye:
Put a large Vodka in that lemonade CHEERS


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Monday, May 25, 2009, 21:37:42
So if you play in a world cup qualifier does that mean you played in the world cup competition?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 21:42:09
So if you play in a world cup qualifier does that mean you played in the world cup competition?
Yes they are all part of the competition.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 21:57:03
I think vodka is the reason dell believes cox would join leicester or reading instead of celtic Nige.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Girlslikefootballtoo on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:06:05
I don't think he'll go to Celtic, yes he's a great goal scorer but I don't think he has what it takes to play for a scottish side, he's not aggressive enough, defenders will wipe the floor with him! 


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:06:44
Your rite DRS


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:09:03
To be fair what cox lacks in strengh he makes up for with tennacity. He is a shit to play against


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Girlslikefootballtoo on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:13:15
Yeah, I understand where you're coming from DRS but I still think he'll get clobbered.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:15:03
Coxys all round game is very good,he does lack in 1-2 areas but the end product is hes an out n out goal scorer and they are worth their weight in gold.Lambert,Beckford,Fryatt dont score the type of goals that Coxy scored this season,thats why hes worth the 2 mill the club are looking for.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:19:10
Agree with that and bar beckford those strikers you mention i would not be confident any would make the step up to championship.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Girlslikefootballtoo on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:20:42
That's in his current comfortable surroundings, each player plays differently with each team he plays for, look at David Platt when he went abroad to play, he was useless!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Monday, May 25, 2009, 22:21:50
Agred not to many hunting them at the moment,not that ive read anywhere.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 07:53:46
Yeah, I understand where you're coming from DRS but I still think he'll get clobbered.

Scott Macdonald is hardly built like a giant brick shithouse but has still scored plenty for Celtic both in the league and in Europe. The fact is that Celtic create chances (especially at home).


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: swindonbob on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 09:36:12
Coxys all round game is very good,he does lack in 1-2 areas but the end product is hes an out n out goal scorer and they are worth their weight in gold.Lambert,Beckford,Fryatt dont score the type of goals that Coxy scored this season,thats why hes worth the 2 mill the club are looking for.

What do you mean they dont score the type of goals Cox does?

I have seen Beckford quite a lot this year, as the bloke I sit next to at work is a Leeds fan and we have been arguing about who is better. Beckford scores some very similar goals to Cox....left foot, right foot, probably even better than him at heading, big fan of lobs etc. And he has scored more goals in total this season (albeit for Leeds).

Admittedly, he is a lazy cunt, so I see where you are coming from there and I would still rather have Cox in my team - but I dont understand how "type of goal" will add on money?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 09:49:23
That's in his current comfortable surroundings, each player plays differently with each team he plays for, look at David Platt when he went abroad to play, he was useless!


I wouldn't have said Platt was useless when he went to Italy.  At the time it was the toughest league in Europe, and he managed 4 years scoring 30 odd goals for Bari. Juve and Sampdoria.  Sampdoria thought highly enough of him to make him coach.

Maybe he didn't set the world alight, but useless is something like Andrea Silenzi at Forest 2 years nil goals....Newcastle have specialised in them...Xisco this season, how about Albert Luque...10 mill 5 year contract 1 goal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 09:50:33
I wouldn't have said Platt was useless when he went to Italy.  At the time it was the toughest league in Europe, and he managed 4 years scoring 30 odd goals for Bari. Juve and Sampdoria.  Sampdoria thought highly enough of him to make him coach.

Maybe he didn't set the world alight, but useless is something like Andrea Silenzi at Forest 2 years nil goals....Newcastle have specialised in them...Xisco this season, how about Albert Luque...10 mill 5 year contract 1 goal.

That spiderman fella they signed was utter garbage everytime I saw him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Chubbs on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 09:59:11
That spiderman fella they signed was utter garbage everytime I saw him.
jonas has been one of their better performers, quality player, very similar style ro riera at liverpool.
very good on the ball


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: strooood on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 10:18:33
I wouldn't have said Platt was useless when he went to Italy.  At the time it was the toughest league in Europe, and he managed 4 years scoring 30 odd goals for Bari. Juve and Sampdoria.  Sampdoria thought highly enough of him to make him coach.

Maybe he didn't set the world alight, but useless is something like Andrea Silenzi at Forest 2 years nil goals....Newcastle have specialised in them...Xisco this season, how about Albert Luque...10 mill 5 year contract 1 goal.
Funnily enough i really rated Luque when they got him for Depor - once again Newcastle ruined a thoroughly good football player.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 10:27:20
beckford has been transfer listed


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 10:29:19
He's just turned down a 3 year contract, and they say they want people who are committed to staying at the club. Fair enough if they can get a decent price for him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 12:00:42
Same position as we are with Cox, i.e. both could walk for (vrtually) free end of next season. If he won't sign a contract they have to cash in.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 13:27:32
Talk of them losing Snodgrass and Delph next season, too. They could be a lot weaker next season, depending on replacements of course.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 16:50:37
Leeds could easily replace them players. Especially if the rumoured amout for Delph is true. They were talking about £5 million at one point.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 17:28:11
Who with?

It's League 1.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 12:55:03
Isn't it funny to hear Fitton saying there has been no written offer for Cox from Celtic....just the adver were so sure they run stores over 2 days on it !!



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 17:20:36
Why would people pay £5m for Delph. He's a great player, but surely Leeds would bite people's hands off for half of that?!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: michael on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 17:22:18
I suspect that Delph's best ever game was against us at the County Ground.

Every time I have seen him since he has been average.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 17:26:00
I suspect that Delph's best ever game was against us at the County Ground.

Every time I have seen him since he has been average.
In that case, £2.5m is too high!
To be fair, the only time I've seen him play well was that game at the County Ground.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: A Gent Orange on Thursday, May 28, 2009, 17:47:19
I wouldn't have said Platt was useless when he went to Italy.  At the time it was the toughest league in Europe, and he managed 4 years scoring 30 odd goals for Bari. Juve and Sampdoria.  Sampdoria thought highly enough of him to make him coach.

Reg is exactly right. Platt was adored at Samp and when he moved between those three clubs Bari, Juve and Samp it was for £5 million a time, back when five million was enough to buy you any player in the world - bar Lentini. Yes he wan't great at Juventus but he played in a deeper role. At Sampdoria he play a full part in about the second best Sampdoria team ever.

Crap pundit though. (Sorry to go back a page - new job, not allowed the internet).


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Saturday, June 6, 2009, 08:37:11
Bump - Seems now that Tony Mowbray is going to be the new Celtic manager. Now, this is quite interesting as 2 of the clubs seemingly leading the chase for Coxy were both Celtic and West Brom. Mowbray is a big fan of Cox (oo er missus) so the Cox to Celtic rumours could now resurface.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/8086779.stm


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pumbaa on Saturday, June 6, 2009, 08:45:58
I wouldn't be surprised to see rumours linking Coxy to Wigan (should Martinez go there) in due course.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, June 6, 2009, 09:55:03
Cox to reading, as they have appointed Brendan Rodgers as manager, Rodgers having been Coxy's mentor and boss through his academy years at Reading.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ibelieveinmrreeves on Saturday, June 6, 2009, 10:08:02
Sorry, thought I was in the rumours thread!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Monday, June 15, 2009, 11:05:59
With the imminent arrival of Mowbray at Celtic I'm guessing we can expect a revised offer for Mr Cox?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Monday, June 15, 2009, 18:24:58
With the imminent arrival of Mowbray at Celtic I'm guessing we can expect a revised offer for Mr Cox?

I dont think so. Mowbray didnt seem 100% convinced of Cox. At a club like WBA, where he was well established he could take a risk. But I dont think he would at Celtic.

Mowbray's move could have killed off the interest from both clubs.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: michael on Monday, June 15, 2009, 18:26:12
Very true.

We can cross Celtic and WBA off the list of suitors for S.Cox's signature.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, June 15, 2009, 18:30:30
Soon as you here we have been linked to someone ....the writing will be on the wall,thats how it usually happens....my money is on Derby or Sheff Utd though a driver from Reading i chat to reckons they are trying to get him back.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ron Burgundy on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 09:39:12
I have a feeling he will stay (but that feeling could just be hope). The offers seemed to have gone silent. He may want regular football rather than sitting on a bench in a higher league. Again this could just be the "hope" voice in my head talking


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 12:45:40
I must admit that I do wonder if he will stay, I think a few of the clubs that he may have been interested in going to have had managerial changes and priorities have changed.

Time will tell though, it will be July before any transfer activity really kicks in though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 16:39:36
Not a hope in hell of him staying


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 16:47:31
Not a hope in hell of him staying

I don't believe in hell.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 16:55:44
You said that in january Jpc when Cox left us for Leeds.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 17:15:11
You said that in january Jpc when Cox left us for Leeds.
it wasnt down to him that the deal didnt happen


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Dazzza on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 17:18:38
What I would say and a lot of credit to him is Cox has kept reasonably stum on the subject of a move unlike a few other players who were chiruping to the media about moving  in recent seasons.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Luci on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 17:19:36
Its never just solely down to the player whether a deal happens or not.  I'd have thought someone of your apparent behind the scenes knowledge JPC would know that.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 17:24:57
They didnt bid for him though did they


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 19:29:01
JPC you know fuck all how do you know that Leeds came in for him.At no time have i read that Leeds had shown any interest in Coxy,so please enlighten me and everyone else where you got your info,probably from one of your young bum chums you keep spouting on about.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 19:30:38
JPC's wind-up has worked it seems.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 19:52:41
This one wasnt a wind up Rich. He was adamant it was done. Fairly sure i got a pm telling me so. Anyway fwiw i do think Cox will leave.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 19:56:00
I think he will too. It's not as if it'll be a case of "I told you so" by anyone - it's more-or-less inevitable.

Do board members or coaches talk to youth players - surely, they hear through the grapevine just like us? (obviously with better sources!)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: yeo on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 20:00:28
I think Jpc say stuff that he's heard and believes to be true and people on here get all wound up cos he might know somthing that you dont know. :)



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 20:02:55
saucy dick waving.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 20:10:54
I think most interested parties will play their trump card. Which is watching Cox's reaction at being asked back to training at Swindon. Watching how itchy his feet are.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 20:19:16
I dont think he will cause a stink spence. If he dont go now he will be in line for a big fat contract for next season at least.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 22:30:38
I wonder where he will go. Anyone got any leads?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Doore on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 22:39:14
He's going to Newcastle.  You heard it here first.  Mainly because I made it up.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 06:57:19
He's going to Newcastle.  You heard it here first.  Mainly because I made it up.
They've certainly made enquiries!  Fitton talking on RS stated that talks were ongoing with interested parties.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:10:44
I keep telling you people, he's off to Real Zaragoza.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:21:24
I wonder where he will go. Anyone got any leads?

Myself, Bushy, Yeovil, there must be loads of us with dogs.

What a stupid question


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: flammableBen on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:22:06
Sporting Lisbon or Kilmarnock.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:23:35
The New Saints or Bangor


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:24:10
They've certainly made enquiries!  Fitton talking on RS stated that talks were ongoing with interested parties.

He also hinted that we are looking for somewhere in the region of £2.5m for him


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bennett on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 07:32:56
Airbus UK


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 08:24:44
Myself, Bushy, Yeovil, there must be loads of us with dogs.

What a stupid question

Bushey hasn't a dog, its a rat.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 09:06:22
Unlike most I don't see him going as inevitable. I am under the impression that he has ambition, but is also very happy with us. With us he is a bid fish in a small pond, & gets regular football. He no doubt remembers that he was warming the bench at a so called bigger club. I also think that if nothging happens he will sign a new extended contract (with a release clause in it)
So, IMHO the follwoing criteria will apply:
Any club interested will have to be able to stump up 2 - 2.5 million to get permission to speak with him.
AF has proved he is very good at selling Swindon & our ambition. He is no doubt saying to Cox, that he could move to the championship with us.
He will have to be moving up a league at least. to a club on the up. (ie top half of the Championship or lower premier)
He will have to be convinced that he will be getting regular football. (Rules some clubs out who could afford him.).
 



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Danjackson10 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:00:37
my gut (which is pretty large) thinks he will stay!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:08:50
A quote from this months 442

"I'd love to play as high as i possibly can... blah de blah... but i'm also happy where i am....blah de blah.... if a team from the premier league comes in for me then i'd love to give it a go. We'll just have to wait and see"



Dum Dum Derrrr


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:29:05
I heard he lost his game of rock, scissors, paper with Fitton and has to stay.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:30:59
I heard he lost his game of rock, scissors, paper with Fitton and has to stay.

It's a flawless method.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:48:35
All the new signings we make can only improve the chances of him staying, if he thinks we could challenge for promotion. Playing week in week out in a successful team, albeit at a lower level, must be enticing. Whether he rates Wilson as a manager will probably make a big difference as well.

I reckon he'll stay, sign a two year extension with a reasonable release clause and a nice pay rise - everyone's a winner. Though if we get Theo Robinson from Watford I won't be too bothered if Cox goes.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:50:56
Where is all the money coming from for backroom staff, poaching youth players and potentially Theo Robinson?

Either Fitton has won the rock, scissor, paper world championship and is using his prize money wisely or a deal for Cox is already done.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:53:06
....or maybe (unlikely) he's pulled some strings and got the boys to dig deeper and ensure a better season?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:54:30
Court pay off money


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 20:55:17
Fitton & co have always come up with the cash when they needed to. Maybe they are just putting some more money in and spending it wisely rather than pissing it away on expensive has beens.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 21:22:26
What's it going to cost long term though? Fitton wants us to be self sustaining, Cox on bigger wages, buying players for six figure sums and extra money for youngsters doesn't really hold true.

I'd love it if the owners are digging deeper though, but I just can't see it.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 21:30:35
I dont understand what you mean Si.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 22:21:12
I think he's trying to say they've already sold Cox and are spending the money.

Or that Fitton has won the world rock, paper, scissors tournament.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 22:28:48
If thats the case then we are self sustaining. We paid for cox and any profit will go back into the club and hopefully get a few players who are hopefully going to improve us and in the long run make us some cash.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 22:39:59
If thats the case then we are self sustaining. We paid for cox and any profit will go back into the club and hopefully get a few players who are hopefully going to improve us and in the long run make us some cash.

But people are saying we are keeping Cox. If we've sold him and spending the money elsewhere then that's great.

If we're keeping him on higher wages and doing all this extra stuff then brilliant. I just think it contradicts Fitton's thinking on how the club should be run so I can't see it.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 22:55:48
I suppose if he stays then it will be on a longer deal meaning we still have a asset on our books. Fitton and co have to outlay some cash at the begining to get what they want in the end. Realistically with cox and morrison here we have a potential 2.5m at least if we sell. Fwiw i think this lad is a replacement for cox.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 23:48:52
I just think it contradicts Fitton's thinking on how the club should be run so I can't see it.

There is a contradiction in Fitton's approach anyway - the club has to be self sufficient but they keep putting more money in. I'd imagine the club is still losing £1m or so a year, they'd have come up with the cash (albeit temporarily) for the court case and other bits and pieces.

But lets remember that they're not pissing their money away. Spending say £200k on Theo Robinson is a pretty safe investment in football terms, buy 10 players like that and you only need to find one Cox to get your money back. Same with investing in youth development, that has already turned a good profit recently and if they invest more sensibly it should do even better.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 00:58:53
I really don't see how we can lose by keeping Cox. The worst case senario is a career ending injury which will be insured against. (I would hope so any way). He could lose form, but not the Cox I've seen playing in a relegation threatened team.
No if I were Fitton, I'd not let him go for a penny less than 2.5 million. I'm confident if he stays we will be pushing for the playoffs at least which will increase the gate & cover his wages easily. PLUS if we were to be promoted we have a striker who is ready for the championship. If we don't go up, then another season of 20-25 goals will only increase his value, assuming that he signs an extention to the contract.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 06:06:23
If Cox is here for the first game of next season I will eat my left bollock (That was the one I was going to eat if Lukas ever started a Premiership game for Everton)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 07:02:18
If Cox is here for the first game of next season I will eat my left bollock

Just for posterity, like. You never know...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 07:32:46
Just for posterity, like. You never know...

Reply to your texts!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 07:53:01
If you add those player salaries into the equation then we'd be talking 5 players. Given the fact we've spent money on McNamee, Casal and McGovern (I know these weren't all under Fitton's reign) then the scenario is far riskier than we think. Sell on clauses will take a fair chunk of the money too. Also, Cox isn't going to be worth £2m+ unless he sings a new deal and we haven't heard anything yet.

I agree with the logic completely I just think we've been very very lucky with Cox and the fans may be getting carried away. Don't get me wrong, if Fitton is going to me risk taking I'd love it from a footballing aspect, so no complaints there. I'd just be very surprised if there is a change of policy.

I guess the one hope is that Wilson and Fitton have both said playoffs at least so may spend more cash but you've only got to look at our playoff season to see these gambles don't pay off a lot of the time. If you look at teams like Leeds and Forest (I know they got out eventually but it could have been very different) then even more so. We don't have the fan base to even contemplate Championship sustainability at the moment and Fitton doesn't want a yo yo team.

I await to be pleasantly surprised but I think I'd be less surprised with a promotion and pay rise at work in the summer than Cox staying. I'm not going to put any of my bollocks on the line though :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Riddick on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 08:24:20
See in todays Adver Fitton reckons it was between us and Norwich for OTJ, so that would have been another 250k we were shelling out! Has the cox deal been done, or should we have real cause to be optimistic for this season, now that we are spending a bit of cash.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 10:57:21
Umm, he's always said he would spend money on players who could realise a future return.  We dabble in the free's for the other types of player.  Spending £200k a time on young talent that is already sought after isn't as risky as spending 200k on league 1 perrenials.  it's why we spent money on Casal, it was a calculated risk.  If 1 out of 5 lets say come off, then you'll make a profit.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 11:35:11
The fact that we'd offered £250k for OTJ puts an extra spin on things, that's £500k or so they're willing to spend (OTJ and Robinson) without a deal for Cox in place (as far as we're aware). Provided Fitton was being honest when he said they want to keep Cox and that he doesn't have to be sold to raise funds, then surely it is a promising sign as it sounds like they have other signings lined up as well.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 11:47:06
We'll have to wait and see, I think Cox is deciding on at least one deal at the moment but that's just a hunch and could be massively wrong. My only other point would be that if we can't realise a suitable return for Cox who finished top goalscorer and had a brilliant season, then hoping for a suitable return on other players is unrealistic.

One thing is for certain, if we're spending money on players (even if it is from funds raised by the sale of Cox) then we need to back manager and chairman 100%. A lot of people have doubted Fitton's unwillingness to spend i.e. with cutting the squad size down; but player purchases would mean investment or reinvestment which we have not seen since our playoff season.

I'm more excited about who we're going to bring in rather than preying Cox will stay, probably because I'm so sure he'll be gone, but nevertheless it's exciting for a change!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 11:54:04
One thing is for certain, if we're spending money on players (even if it is from funds raised by the sale of Cox) then we need to back manager and chairman 100%. A lot of people have doubted Fitton's unwillingness to spend i.e. with cutting the squad size down; but player purchases would mean investment or reinvestment which we have not seen since our playoff season.

Has Fitton ever said he won't spend? He always seems to come up with the money if he thinks its worth it. Sure, they're cutting the size of the squad but that's pretty much just a case of getting rid of the shit we didn't want and didn't play. Which comes back again to Fitton being sensible with the money.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 11:56:34
I'm just reiterating some of the general comments fans have made about his prudent approach.

I think Fitton has his financial policies spot on.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 12:05:23
I'm just reiterating some of the general comments fans have made about his prudent approach.

I think Fitton has his financial policies spot on.

I agree Si.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Mplanney on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 13:06:34
I'm glad we didn't spend the £250,000 on OTJ, personally think we could get a better player for that sort of money, he was good but not that good on my opinion.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 13:32:37
I'm glad we didn't spend the £250,000 on OTJ, personally think we could get a better player for that sort of money, he was good but not that good on my opinion.

I'm inclined to agree with you. Tudur Jones did alright after a slow start and scored the goal at Carlisle but £250,000?

However, I'm applauding the intent of our manager and board. Charlie Mulgrew was the only significant financial transfer rumour last season and that was a good £100,000 less (Casal and Marshall both cheaper signings) - this season there's a few bids going in.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 13:43:47
Dunno about anyone else but I'm loving being a Town fan at the moment. Making decent cash bids for players, poaching youth teamers from higher division sides, solid and dependable board of directors. It's all good.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 13:45:04
A bit of on pitch success would be good though ;)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Paolo69 on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 13:45:33
Totally agree and makes a refreshing change after all those years since the Prem season


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:15:49
I'm inclined to agree with you. Tudur Jones did alright after a slow start and scored the goal at Carlisle but £250,000?

Me too. Far better players available on free transfers, compare us signing Greer to Norwich signing OTJ and I'd say Norwich got totally screwed paying that for him. OTJ was better than what we had but I didn't see anything from him to suggest he is worth paying a fee for. He seems to have already peaked to me and won't get any better, I can't see Norwich ever selling him for a profit.

Though Fitton was quoted as saying OTJ wasn't their first choice midfielder and that they've got someone else lined up. Not sure whether this player is viewed as being better or worse, difficult to tell from what Fitton said (that they didn't think OTJ would be an option for them).

It is nice to see us making bids though - £250k for a player is decent money at League 1 level.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:49:04
I'm not saying it's not the case but who are these players everyone keeps saying are cheaper and better than OTJ.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:56:44
I'm not saying it's not the case but who are these players everyone keeps saying are cheaper and better than OTJ.

I still think we need to keep a closer eye on the Blue Square Conference. For example, Peterborough spent £150,000 on Aaron McLean and £125,000 on Craig Mackail-Smith.

My opinion on Owain Tudur Jones is that this is his level, maybe lower end of the Championship (which isn't bad). For Fitton to want to make profit on players they have to look like they've got a potential Premiership future ahead of them.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spy on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:56:55
I'm not knowledgable enough to give you names DRS but I've said it before and I'll say it again now - we can get better than OTJ.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:58:10
Diagoraga was better and cost less. The bloke who was on loan for cheltnumb from leeds was better


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 14:59:03
Westlake?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 15:09:49
I'm not saying it's not the case but who are these players everyone keeps saying are cheaper and better than OTJ.

I haven't got a clue, but I'd say Greer was cheaper and is a lot better. Sure he plays in a different position but I think it shows there are better bargains to be had.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 15:22:26
Diagourha went to championship Dave and i assume you seen the other one who's name you don't know play alot then ;-). Jonny solid young midfielders are alot harder to come across than centre halves with experience in my opinion mate. As i said no doubt there is cheaper and better but off the top of my head i can't think of any.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 15:25:50
The one who i don't know his name played really well at the county ground, and even though its not saying much the cheltenham fans seemed to rate him. Is more of a ball player than a midfield enforcer though


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 15:28:56
Josh wright is a good prospect by all accounts too, the were raving about him on the radio during the play-off final. Not sure about charltons financial state with regards to a price, but he'd certainly fit in with fittons "sell on for a profit" plan


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 15:34:00
I imagine that Josh Wright, along with that Jonjo Shelvey, will be regulars for Charlton this season.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 17:18:13
What happened to David Noble?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 17:18:45
Nothing as of yet.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 17:46:56
Wonder if he's the target then?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 18, 2009, 17:52:29
He was linked to Bristol Rovers and Yeovil - the former have dismissed the link and I doubt Yeovil could afford his wages... I guess we could be interested given geography et al.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Sunday, June 21, 2009, 10:18:57
Saw Simon Cox in McKenzies last night (pointless, irrelevant but atleast still wants to be here)!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:38:54
he's hardly going to move away until a contract is signed with a new club. Just because he was in a bar in swindon, doesn't mean he wants to stay.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Danjackson10 on Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:43:04
Leave the straw clutcher alone sippo :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Sunday, June 21, 2009, 12:52:02
Leave the straw clutcher alone sippo :)

It's way past clutching straws... clutching blades of grass now! :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 12:58:44
If as it seems we are missing out on targets we should break the wage structure and offer cox a deal he can't refuse. Although saying that if we do not get improvements on last year you could not blame him for leaving.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC Bart on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:09:09
We aint going to get promoted by paying peanuts.

Peterborough didnt spend on transfer fees last season- but they pushed the boat out on wages- the only way to reach our objectives is investment in the team.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:11:10
We aint going to get promoted by paying peanuts.

Peterborough didnt spend on transfer fees last season- but they pushed the boat out on wages- the only way to reach our objectives is investment in the team.

Who said we are paying peanuts?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:19:22
We aint going to get promoted by paying peanuts.

Peterborough didnt spend on transfer fees last season- but they pushed the boat out on wages- the only way to reach our objectives is investment in the team.

'boro's turnover was also much bigger than ours because their chairman exploited a loop-hole in the wage structure rules by sponsoring the club with his own company for much more than a club of their stucture would have got anywhere elseI seem to remember - we can't go breaking the bank like they did because we'd be breaking rules.

Also, we're not going to get promoted anyway, no matter how much we spend, like it or not we simply will not attract the best players, L1 has quite a few clubs that are a lot bigger than us.

How about you just wait and see what happens instead of just getting on your soapbox and regurgitating the same old material you've been peddling for the last few seasons?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:27:46

How about you just wait and see what happens instead of just getting on your soapbox and regurgitating the same old material you've been peddling for the last few seasons?

What the kinky one said.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:29:30
it is still way to early to have a pop.but we will need to spend if we are to progress out of div 3.
i see no reason why we wont


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:33:06
Agree Arriba. Bart got crucified last pre season but was proved right tbf


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:36:06
I don't think Bart was proven right at all, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

And whose to say we won't spend anyway? We are clearly willing to after all but oh wait, shock and horror...... players might actually choose a team with a better chance of promotion than us.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:42:16
I didn't say we wont spend. I'm just saying that he gets alot of shit for saying what others also post.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:50:37
You have to speculate to acumalate (is that the right saying?!)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 13:54:32
Yep you are right. Part of me thinks scrap the fee's we are paying and pay bigger wages but i know it is not that easy.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:17:36
The point is that Bart doesn't manage his expectations at all, he's like a Man Ure fan trapped inside a Swindon fan's body - the way he bangs on about finances etc. is as though he thinks he has a god given right to support a team that brings success and that eveyone involved in the club is doing their best to make sure that doesn't happen to make him miserable.

He should have gone out there and made a fortune for himself, no doubt he would have ploughed it all into the club himself by now and we'd be champions of the universe but he didn't did he.

We're a small club, success if we get it will be a slow evolving beast not some over night flash in the pan.  We've got the rest of our lives to follow this club, there will be ups and downs but we will never be a big club and as such expectations should reflect this.

I don't think it's fair on those in charge to be forever castigated by people like him for how they spend their money, they really are doing what they see as best for the club after all.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:26:20
I do agree mate it just seems we are missing out on targets again so maybe we should look at what we are doing. Saying that i wouldnt expect us to compete with Norwich and hudders.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:33:47
We've only missed out on OTJ so far, people will say we missed out on Nelson but I don't suppose we ever tried to get him I don't see another CB on big wages as a proirity, if Rose doesn't come I suspect that will be a location issue - if we lose out on Theo I'll be more worried admittedly given that he'd have to up sticks to go up there.

We've got a good set up off the field now so the team will be more organised anyway - there hasn't been much business done in L1 just yet so I don't think we're too far behind in that respect and the season is a month and a half off, bit too soon to be panicking about transfers for me.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:35:13
Is Bart aka the Changeling on the adver comments section they seem to be reading from the same hymn sheet


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:40:58
Is Bart aka the Changeling on the adver comments section they seem to be reading from the same hymn sheet

Think most people over there subscribe to the same school of thought on this issue.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 14:44:39
Surely not the user Shirtliffter seems to be a reasonable guy he does not seem to be winding them up in any way  :D :D :D :D :D :D ;)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 15:47:19
You have to speculate to acumalate (is that the right saying?!)

correct saying, incorrect spelling  (accumulate)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 17:33:56
We've only missed out on OTJ so far, people will say we missed out on Nelson but I don't suppose we ever tried to get him I don't see another CB on big wages as a proirity, if Rose doesn't come I suspect that will be a location issue - if we lose out on Theo I'll be more worried admittedly given that he'd have to up sticks to go up there.

We've got a good set up off the field now so the team will be more organised anyway - there hasn't been much business done in L1 just yet so I don't think we're too far behind in that respect and the season is a month and a half off, bit too soon to be panicking about transfers for me.

Spot on Tom


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 18:29:10
When Bart doesnt post, you know things are on the up.

Last season was the worst season Ive ever seen at Swindon. I dont need someone ramming it down my throat on the internet.

My hunch is that Theo Robinson wont be signing though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: newmarket red on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 18:33:51
When Bart doesnt post, you know things are on the up.

Last season was the worst season Ive ever seen at Swindon. I dont need someone ramming it down my throat on the internet.

My hunch is that Theo Robinson wont be signing though.
Theres plenty of other strikers out there im sure :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 19:04:45
Theres plenty of other strikers out there im sure :)
Oh yes like who?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Devon Nige on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 19:06:47
We've only missed out on OTJ so far, people will say we missed out on Nelson but I don't suppose we ever tried to get him I don't see another CB on big wages as a proirity, if Rose doesn't come I suspect that will be a location issue - if we lose out on Theo I'll be more worried admittedly given that he'd have to up sticks to go up there.

We've got a good set up off the field now so the team will be more organised anyway - there hasn't been much business done in L1 just yet so I don't think we're too far behind in that respect and the season is a month and a half off, bit too soon to be panicking about transfers for me.
Weve also missed out on Robinson hes off to uddersfield


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 19:12:40
Weve also missed out on Robinson hes off to uddersfield

Not confirmed anywhere, and I also cover that in the post you quoted...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 07:19:45
Not confirmed anywhere, and I also cover that in the post you quoted...

Southend have ruled out signing him as Watford want a fee of £275,000


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SouthDevonRed on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 08:48:49
Looks like we can't / won't compete with Huddersfield on the wages front. That can be the only reason Robinson would go there.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 08:52:39
Robinson hasn't gone anywhere yet....


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 10:23:47
Apparently the Daily Star is reporting Celtic are about to sign Cox for £2.5m.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 10:29:28
Hopefully we'll put a 40% sell on clause for when he moves from Celtic to Liverpool for £25m


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 10:30:49
Apparently the Daily Star is reporting Celtic are about to sign Cox for £2.5m.
They probably saw it on a 3-week-old rumour thread somewhere


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 12:50:33
Has he left yet?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 12:59:49
Some Celtic fan on 606 in the last hour seems to think that it is a done deal for £2.3 Million if that is the case then it is great result for both parties and hopefully Wilson can go shopping.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 13:44:35
Looking at some other news articles, it looks like Cox is one of three strikers Celtic are chasing - Diomansy Kamara  from Fulham and Marc Antoine-Fortune from Nancy. Looks like they might not be able to afford the other two with Cox being the cheapest option.

Celtic must be a pretty likely outcome seeing as they were interested before Mowbray went there.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 13:59:41
If true, I think the deal will be worth £2.5m but may include a/some fringe/youth players coming our way so as to minimise the sell clause amount to Reading


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:02:45
Some Celtic fan on 606 in the last hour seems to think that it is a done deal for £2.3 Million if that is the case then it is great result for both parties and hopefully Wilson can go shopping.

Except he's ruined his exclusive by saying the price is £2300, pinch of salt, there isn't anything at all about Cox on their main forum.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:04:07
Except he's ruined his exclusive by saying the price is £2300, pinch of salt, there isn't anything at all about Cox on their main forum.
Typical Scot


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC Bart on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:32:57
If Cox goes we will need 3 strikers as it will only leave Paynter.

Goals will be essential from all plus stop leaking them if we are to have any chance of staying up. Remember Cox goals kept us up this year


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:37:12
Shit yeah didn't think of that


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: fatbury on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:39:22
at present we only have Billy Paynter .... we appear to have missed out on Robinson ... Id expect one loan signing to bring us up to 2 players and one permanent with maybe a youth making up the 4th striker option ...

Any suggestions as to which striker to buy for half a mil?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:41:01
Reuben Reid.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:43:20
Beat me to it Scm


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:50:22
Shit yeah didn't think of that

It's obvious now he's said it though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:55:43
Where is it reported that Robinson is gonig to 'uddersfiled and not us then ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:59:15
Shit yeah didn't think of that

Fucking hell my sarcasm detector shot off the scale then DRS!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 14:59:45
Fucking hell my sarcasm detector shot off the scale then DRS!

Really?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 15:03:56
Me?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Doore on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 15:39:15
Where is it reported that Robinson is gonig to 'uddersfiled and not us then ?

Maybe its in the Daily Star, apparently that's where we are taking our "facts" from these days. 


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 15:40:56
Really?

A tad.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 15:59:12
If Cox goes we will need 3 strikers as it will only leave Paynter.

Goals will be essential from all plus stop leaking them if we are to have any chance of staying up. Remember Cox goals kept us up this year

Fucking hell! really?

has someone told Danny Wilson this?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 16:11:00
Where is it reported that Robinson is gonig to 'uddersfiled and not us then ?

I don't think there is any other than someone having a laugh on Wikipedia. And that's gone now too.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 16:23:54
If Cox goes we will need 3 strikers as it will only leave Paynter.

Goals will be essential from all plus stop leaking them if we are to have any chance of staying up. Remember Cox goals kept us up this year

I'm pleased you've gone from the earlier nonsense about what we need for promotion, to the much more sensible, if we're to have a chance of staying up.

Apparently Wilson was interested in the boy Green at Torquay...but he preferred a loan move to the Scum.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 16:27:22
Of course he did


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 16:42:11
I'm pleased you've gone from the earlier nonsense about what we need for promotion, to the much more sensible, if we're to have a chance of staying up.

Apparently Wilson was interested in the boy Green at Torquay...but he preferred a loan move to the Scum.

Where did that one come from ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 16:45:17
I guess I'm cynical but I assume that Bart has returned because it's rumoured that we've missed out on a decent player?

Welcome back Bartholomew :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 17:43:01
Anywho...

I imagine we might get that Cuthbert chap in any deal between Celtic and Cox.

Also, I don't think I want that Reuben Reid for the same reason as clubs won't pay £2.5million for Cox - Reid has had one season in League 2.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 18:17:28
Someone text Fred about this news please.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 18:20:54
There isn't any news just a rumour still.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pumbaa on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 18:33:55
Absolutely not. We have positive evidence that Bart is back......


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 18:36:54
Yeah but why irritate him with that?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bennett on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 06:48:06
perhaps we can see if peacock fancies playing up front this year to replace cox?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 07:24:21
perhaps we can see if peacock fancies playing up front this year to replace cox?

Wasn't Peacock supposed to return as a striker for next season anyway ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 07:37:44
Yeah - but he was supposed to be a striker last season as well.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 07:58:42
If Peacock makes double figures in appearances, i'll go support Palace. If he does feature will be off the bench, and i cant even see that.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:20:03
Just looking at the player sponsorship taken/available. Cox's was most apt given his expected transfer:

Simon Cox - Transportation Planning Ltd

What other companies could be matched to players?

(slow work day...)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:25:15
I like David Lucas' - Divorce Online


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:30:18
Looking at this site:

http://www.thecareerbreaksite.com/fun/funny-names-places/funny-company-names.php

I'd say Casal - Krapko


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 10:32:29
Didn't we used to be owned by the company directly below Krapko?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 11:55:40
Just looking at the player sponsorship taken/available. Cox's was most apt given his expected transfer:

Simon Cox - Transportation Planning Ltd

What other companies could be matched to players?

(slow work day...)

Look to me like this is a place holder in case he is sold - no such company listed at companies house.

It's a sensible move, if he goes then his 'sponsor won't be dissappointed. if he stays then I would auction his sponsorship off to the highest bidder or do something similar to the 'Stand by me' sponsorhip - they could even tie in with a match ball sponsorship and call it the 'Cox and ball' package :nod:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 12:43:32
Look to me like this is a place holder in case he is sold - no such company listed at companies house.

There is a; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: @MacPhlea on Thursday, June 25, 2009, 14:07:38
yes, but not a TRANSPORTATION PLANNING LIMITED...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: spacey on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:12:38
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1196114/Cox-set-2-5m-West-Brom-switch-Blackburn-Forest-close-deals.html What most Daily Mail readers will be wondering is 'How will this affect house prices?'

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/2009/06/29/deal-for-irvine-in-the-bagg-115875-21479908/ What Daily Mirror readers will be thinking is 'I wish I could read.'

If this has already been posted then you can kiss my arse.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:15:29
Be a great move for him,lets hope we can get a player or two on loan chucked in with that.

It has not been posted spacey but can i still kiss that ass?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:16:35
Great move for him, he can help lead a team who generally yo-yo's between the championship and the premiership. Good luck to him. :(


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:17:55
Fucking great deal for us Gazza let alone him mate.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Riddick on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:18:35
It always seemed likely he would go to WBA, and if we get £2.5 million its great work from Fitton. Never expected him to stay but from a publicity point of view we really need to get some players in and stop losing out on players (OTJ and possibly Robinson)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:19:20
Fucking great deal for us Gazza let alone him mate.

Oh totally agree, dont get me wrong. Great for all involved. Good replacement for Marc-Antoine Fortune at WBA. Let's hope we can get someone here with a goalscoring pedigree to compliment Paynter's 15 goals....


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: spacey on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:19:45
Be a great move for him,lets hope we can get a player or two on loan chucked in with that.

It has not been posted spacey but can i still kiss that ass?

Yeah, why not.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:20:44
Good move if true.

Cox gets his chance in the championship and we get our valuation met.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:26:42
Good deal, but probably bad timing for us the day before that Season Ticket thingy (that is tomorrow, isn't it?)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:27:23
Good deal, but probably bad timing for us the day before that Season Ticket thingy (that is tomorrow, isn't it?)

Maybe why it has been kept hush hush at our end?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:28:54
Maybe it's not as close as it suggests.Anyway if true and the board come out and say they will re invest some in the squad then that should help


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:29:51
cox you judas cunt. hope we get them in the cup so i can boo him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:31:04
perhaps teh WBA friendly was part of the deal then?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC Bart on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:53:24
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: mexico red on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:54:44
hahaha


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC4LIFE on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:55:22
Haha, hello Bart.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:57:58
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox

Simple Answer: Cox is 3 times the player Lambert is or every will be and by the way Welcome back, yeah what a lack of ambition how dare the board sell our prized assett for £2.5M instead of letting him walk away for free next season, Bastards. FITTON OUT!  >:(


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:58:52
He actually made me laugh with that. I now await eagerly his serious reply stating it was serious and that we are going no where and have no ambition made worse that his bloke only left soya milk in the fridge which made it impossible to enjoy his shredded wheat.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:04:57
He actually made me laugh with that. I now await eagerly his serious reply stating it was serious and that we are going no where and have no ambition made worse that his bloke only left soya milk in the fridge which made it impossible to enjoy his shredded wheat.
I expect something along the lines of "oh well if we lose Cox we will get relegated costing us more than 2.5M (when  I think it is 250k) or how we should signed him to a long term contract last season (which we tried  to do). This is actually the best deal we have had for a player in ages... well in terms of money, new record transfer fee which is not a bad return from 250K last year (admittedly Reading get a decent cut). i am sure some bollocks about how all the 2.5M should be used on players etc..

I would say maybe 750k at the very most spent towards wages, playing squad etc combined. and  1M to reading (approx) and the rest towards paying the shortfall that we will have for this season so we break even for once! :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:05:15
Good deal for player and club. I'm sure Wilson will get some of the money to spend but lets not get carried away. We're still a loss making club and i'm sure Fitton will want to address that!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Summerof69 on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:07:12
Wouldn't West Brom wait for a new manager to be employed before buying Cox ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:08:46
Its official(ish)   http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/headlines/4463645.BREAKING_NEWS__West_Brom_s___2million_Cox_bid_accepted/


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: DiV on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:10:38
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox

....because teams want to sign Cox yet no one wants Lambert.

Plus - Lambert wasnt L1s top scorer


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:21:35
Bye Bye Cox, Cheers for the goals! Good Luck at WBA!! See you in pre-season!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:27:29
Inevitable I suppose. He is too good for what we can offer him right now. So thanks for the goals and the cash Cox, and good luck.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:29:14
Wonder what Ibon Arrieta is up to these days? :D


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: wokinghamred on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:30:57
Interesting comment from Fitton.

"We have earmarked some of the money to strengthen the squad, and you should assume that we are already on the case in finding a replacement."

Sounds like Robinson may not be viewed as the replacement.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:39:09
Well we knew this was going to happen. 2 million is a good deal really on the face of it. Let's just hope we actually sign some decent players with the money.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: tans on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:44:15
I see the spazzers on the comments page have already started!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: alanmayes on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:49:26
Good luck Coxy! It's much better for us to have this deal sorted now rather than in august.

However,there's now an awful lot of pressure on Wilson and Fitton to get the right players

in and to actually get them signed up! As well all know we've had a few problems in that

regard.I really hope that they can achieve this in all areas of the team.


I've just checked the WBA OS and it brings home the difference between the 2 clubs.

WBA's opening match of the 09/10 season is a home game with Newcastle.

They report back for training next friday,nice new Umbro Kit as well.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:50:43
Away at the Pikeys is better surely though?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: alanmayes on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:54:52
Away at the Pikeys is better surely though?

Maybe for you and me mate,but i see that BBC will have Championship Highlights that evening.
Coxy the new star on MOTD has a good feel to it.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Maguire11 on Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:55:10
Good luck Coxy, you put more effort in just one game than most the squad did in the entire season.
you will be missed by every single Town fan.

I got a feeling he will be quality in the championship now.
you will get a great reception for the Town faithful when ever you play against us im sure.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: sonicyouth on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:14:19
maybe he won't want to leave  :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:32:25
Reading on the WBA forum, they aren't exactly inspired by his signing.

Quote
Oh and Cox....not exactly Zidane is he? It not as if it is an earth shattering transfer.

Good luck to him, a good move if it finalises.

Wierd that they are signing him without having a manager in place though.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:33:51
Yeah it is especially after it was Mowbray who was interested as well. Wonder if Celtic will try and hijack the deal?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: santasdead on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:34:43
Wierd that they are signing him without having a manager in place though.

I read from one of the links posted earlier today, in this thread, that they are announcing someone today. Unless i just made that up,which i probably did.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:36:01
One of the reports I ahve seen says the deal is done for Cox but WBA need to confirm with their new manager whomever that is (rumoured to be PNE's gaffer) whether he wants the player.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:40:31
It's alan irvine who was interested in Cox at Preston but did not have the finances


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, June 29, 2009, 10:49:34
It's alan irvine who was interested in Cox at Preston but did not have the finances

Well putting 2 + 2 together and getting 5 we have the new WBA manager then mate.

I know Irvine has been touted as new manager but I understood Preston refused permission tor talks.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, June 29, 2009, 11:07:09
I am pleasantly surprised by the £2 million fee (accepting, of course, that we will not see all of that sum with payments to Reading FC etc.)  If he had gone for £1.25 million, I would not have batted an eyelid.

A very tidy piece of business that would not have been possible if we still had cowboys in the boardroom.  Good luck Simon, and well done Messrs Fitton and Watkins.  We seem to be doing business like a proper football club again.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, June 29, 2009, 11:11:32
The old board would have taken Huddersfield's 500K offer


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Monday, June 29, 2009, 12:54:49
As long as we get told the fee and that it is not 'undisclosed' it sounds like it is x up front and then the rest over a period of time with 500k worth of add on's(promotion, goals scored etc) hopefully we will have sell on clause as well.
 
It may even prompt other clubs that may have been waiting and watching to see what happen into making offers.

WBA are probably in a decent location for Coxy as well to be able to travel to and keep his current home

Good luck to him


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC Bart on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:00:43
Anyone any ideas on who could replace him? Loook slike Robinson is dead in the water


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:09:31
We're going to but lambert


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:10:07
Anyone any ideas on who could replace him? Loook slike Robinson is dead in the water
Christ, was it a boating accident or something?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: alanmayes on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:23:19
Christ, was it a boating accident or something?

Drowned by the weight of expectations of the Huddersfield fans  :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Berniman on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:28:47
We're going to but lambert

Headbutt?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Monday, June 29, 2009, 13:30:07
2 mill is a decent price for him.about time we got proper value for one of our players


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, June 29, 2009, 16:05:37
Heard today from my sauce (Samdy Look!!) that he is going to Celtic.....deal done next week.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Spencer_White on Monday, June 29, 2009, 16:55:22
Going to be a record transfer in our history, in or out. That says it all.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:01:41
Wont happen but would love to see us go out and get kanu and that reuban reid.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:05:34
I heard a little birdie (no not budgie!) saying we had made an offer for Jem Karacan and Hal Robson-Kanu both on season long loan from Reading.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:09:05
Jem karacen


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Kinky Tom on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:12:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UTnz47YRAA


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:15:42
He shinned it.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:19:23
Fuck knows what happened to my last post. Anyway karacen is highly rated


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Danjackson10 on Monday, June 29, 2009, 17:19:59
Shinnnnnyyyyy!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: blinkpip on Monday, June 29, 2009, 19:04:26
Kanu, I forgot about him. I would love to have him back for the season.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: SCM on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 01:36:22
Rumours that Irvine has failed to agree terms at WBA. Surely they won't sign him without a manager?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 07:28:09
I would be extremely surprised if Cox wanted to to WBA while they have no manager, what happens if the new manager came in and didn't rate him or took exception to the board signing players for him.

I would have thought Cox would wait see who the new manager is and want to have talks with him first to see where the manager see's him fitting in (and of course he won't know not knowing what type of squad he is inheriting)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: tans on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 07:46:48
I would love it if Karacan and Kanu come, but cant see it happening.

As for WBA isnt it the chairman behind the Cox deal, so as to fuck Celtic off?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 08:10:16
I would be extremely surprised if Cox wanted to to WBA while they have no manager, what happens if the new manager came in and didn't rate him or took exception to the board signing players for him.

I would have thought Cox would wait see who the new manager is and want to have talks with him first to see where the manager see's him fitting in (and of course he won't know not knowing what type of squad he is inheriting)
Of course its inconceivable that West Brom have already spoken to their preferred candidate as manager, that he may have said "I'd quite like that young lad from Swindon, if I become your manager will there be funds available?" and having received a positive answer, that said hypothetical future Baggies gaffer has spoken to Cox and said "Hello, I'm lined up to be the next West Brom manager would you like to come and play for me?". Because that would breach all kinds of etiquette about poaching managers, not lining things up before you've done the deal etc and that would never happen in English football :)


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 08:19:42
Also the fact that Jeremy Peace is well known for signing players then presenting them to the manager.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 09:44:40
Alan Irvine has said no to West Brom.

The plot thickens! Maybe Cox will be their new boss?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:11:12
Fuck knows what happened to my last post. Anyway karacen is highly rated

and is also best mates with one of our players!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:14:42
Alan Irvine has said no to West Brom.
Oooh, in which case maybe P2P has a point - I was assuming Irvine was nailed on and it was all agreed in advance of actually concluding the formalities.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:17:04
Oooh, in which case maybe P2P has a point - I was assuming Irvine was nailed on and it was all agreed in advance of actually concluding the formalities.

I think that at one point it was a done deal.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:18:00
Alan Irvine has said no to West Brom.

The plot thickens! Maybe Cox will be their new boss?
Di Matteo is the new favourite


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:20:20
I think the deal was agreed ages ago in principle, before the manager fucked off to Celtic.

Which is why we suddenly had a pre season friendly with West Brom, not Bournemouth.

Now the ex Baggies boss is at Celtic, who knows what's gonna happen?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 12:21:48
if the chairman is trying to sign players,no wonder managers are turning them down.i just wish cox would hurry up and leave.the longer he's still here,the longer until we get a replacement


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 13:13:25
Looks like Roberto Di Matteo is going to be the new baggies boss within the next 48hours


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 13:55:42
Looks like Roberto Di Matteo is going to be the new baggies boss within the next 48hours

I hope franchise get someone shit to replace him.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: lambourn red on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 14:00:14
I hope franchise get someone shit to replace him.

There is one safe bet they wont come after Wilson soapy tit wank


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 14:15:27
I hope franchise get someone shit to replace him.

Malpas hopefully!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 14:30:50
That would be great if they went backwards

Big risk for WBA though appointing someone with limited experience


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 14:40:09
Malpas hopefully!

No ones daft enough to do that surely?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: alanmayes on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 14:46:43
Seeing as it's Franchise,they're hoping to sign a very promising midfielder Stephen Gleeson from Wolves.
Let's nip in and sign him up whilst they're in limbo with the departure of Di Matteo.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 15:04:22
if the chairman is trying to sign players,no wonder managers are turning them down.i just wish cox would hurry up and leave.the longer he's still here,the longer until we get a replacement

I dunno, I reckon I could wait three or four years...


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 15:06:05
Seeing as it's Franchise,they're hoping to sign a very promising midfielder Stephen Gleeson from Wolves.
Let's nip in and sign him up whilst they're in limbo with the departure of Di Matteo.

Huddersfield will already be on the case.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 11:48:23
Di Matteo has agreed the deal, WBA have agreed personal terms and Cox will have a medical next week

http://www.wba.co.uk/page/News/0,,10366~1711269,00.html


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:35:32
But if they have agreed terms why is he not having a medical etc straight away and signing, I wonder what the delay is ?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 12:54:08
There is no delay.  Di Matteo is being presented to the media today.  He hasn't really started yet, so next week is probably the earliest time it can happen.



Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: pauld on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:03:50
But if they have agreed terms why is he not having a medical etc straight away and signing, I wonder what the delay is ?
His leg fell off and it's going to take till next week to sellotape it back on convincingly enough that West Brom don't notice during the medical


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:33:02
He's verbally agreed but and told them that he'll complete the deal next week but what WBA don't know is that he's really going to Huddersfield.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: strooood on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:52:40
I recon he's holding out for another move.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 13:59:00
Told ya its Celtic..........they are keeping it under wraps....


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: santasdead on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:02:33
In one of my sillyest posts to date - i recon he's holding out for us to offer him a contract extension, with a pay rise.

Clutching at straws is always fun.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:04:39
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/huddersfield_town/8130763.stm

Lambo is too old....

Thats what you get for ruining my promotion party in league 2!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:07:44
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/huddersfield_town/8130763.stm

Lambo is too old....

Thats what you get for ruining my promotion party in league 2!

Maybe they're not as stupid as they seem.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Summerof69 on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:13:39
It says he his unproven above League 1 level.

Can someone tell Huddersfield, that is where they are...in League One !!!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Phil_S on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:15:48
Concerned about resale value at the end of the contract ? What bollocks It would be nil who ever it was if he is over 21 as he would be on a free !


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 15:59:42
See Mandaric is spouting off again..just cos ware a big club Swindon upped there value,ware not a club who throws money about willy nilly....is this the same bloke who let Harry Wideboy Redknapp spend millions on nobodys at Portsmouth...have another glass of sour grape wine you tosser...and i would love Coxy to score the winner in both matches they play next year v West Brom.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 16:22:34
mandaric is right.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 16:32:46
mandaric is right.

And a sour faced old Leicester cunt........how i hate that club!!!

Glad Coxy isnt going there.......Bristol City would of been more bearable....


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 17:01:21
How is he right Arriba. We did not value him higher just because they made a bid


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 17:14:59
I am 100% sure that if Leicester bid exactly the same as WBA then that bid will be accepted also.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 19:09:04
I like the way Coxy wasnt interested in em anyway..truth be known WBA was probably a done deal ages ago.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 19:16:07
Contradictions, contradictions, contradictions.

How dare Swindon Town look after their best interests.
How dare Simon Cox not want to join Leicester City.

Once Simon Cox leaves Swindon it's irrelevant to me how well he does - sure, it's nice to see them do well but if it's not in a Town shirt, meh :)

I recall Ruper Lowe whinging about bigger clubs poaching young talent RE: Theo Walcott - even Southampton fans said "didn't we take this kid from Swindon?"

There are good football owners out there - they tend to be the ones who don't whine to the national media.

The fact is, even without a major bidding war, Fitton got what he wanted for a Cox bid to be accepted.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Thursday, July 2, 2009, 19:17:20
Contradictions, contradictions, contradictions.

How dare Swindon Town look after their best interests.
How dare Simon Cox not want to join Leicester City.

Once Simon Cox leaves Swindon it's irrelevant to me how well he does - sure, it's nice to see them do well but if it's not in a Town shirt, meh :)

I recall Ruper Lowe whinging about bigger clubs poaching young talent RE: Theo Walcott - even Southampton fans saying "didn't we take this kid from Swindon?"

There are good football owners out there - they tend to be the ones who don't whine to the national media.

The fact is, even without a major bidding war, Fitton got what he wanted for a Cox bid to be accepted.

Thats what i meant to say Rich!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, July 6, 2009, 18:27:21
In the most shocking development of the day, Simon Cox has passed his medical. Will be unveiled at West Brom tomorrow!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Monday, July 6, 2009, 19:20:31
Presumably Mandaric is sat there thinking West Brom have paid double what Cox is worth, and got ripped off because they are a big club. It'll be interesting to see how he does this season.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: leefer on Monday, July 6, 2009, 19:23:02
WBA will score loads...Cox will get twenty if he plays all season..personally i think he will be a prem player sooner rather than later and the dosh WBA are splashing out is money well spent.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Maguire11 on Monday, July 6, 2009, 19:39:20
im thinking of a fiver on Cox to be top goal scorer in CCC, should get quite good odds on that though!


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, July 6, 2009, 20:12:27
im thinking of a fiver on Cox to be top goal scorer in CCC, should get quite good odds on that though!

Depends what kind of run he gets in the team, logic would say he is on a good side, will get plenty of service with the type of football they play and I can hardly see them paying £2m to sit on the bench. Could be a good shout although I think Jason Scotland will finish top..


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Monday, July 6, 2009, 20:18:28
I'd imagine Cox is going there as their first choice striker - none of their players even got in to double figures last season. I know they were shit and in the Premier League, but that is still a pretty bad statistic. I confidently predict Cox will be in the Premier League the season after next, most likely with West Brom when they get promoted.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: 4D on Monday, July 6, 2009, 21:41:16
I see WBA have Histon away in a friendly on Saturday.  :-[


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:25:20
What is the hold up with this transfer, most deals are done quite quickly, offer accepted, players talks terms, player has medical deal done but this has been gonig on for weeks, ok granted they have not had a manager so that was a dealy but surely with Di Matteo saying he wanted cox and cox having a chat and medical then it should be deal done...but it still seems to be dragging on


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:28:50
What is the hold up with this transfer, most deals are done quite quickly, offer accepted, players talks terms, player has medical deal done but this has been gonig on for weeks, ok granted they have not had a manager so that was a dealy but surely with Di Matteo saying he wanted cox and cox having a chat and medical then it should be deal done...but it still seems to be dragging on
We don't know how long it took for them to agree the terms of the contract, and the medical only happened yesterday. They then have to get all the relevant paperwork sorted and arrange a press conference (if they so wish) before Cox will be revealed as their player. I'm sure it'll happen today or tomorrow.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 16:46:25
I wonder if one of the high street bookies will give odds on a double; Cox to be Championship top scorer next season then Premier League top scorer the following season. Got to be about 500/1 plus, more likely 1000/1.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 16:51:20
 Roman Bednar can always help out Cox, if he's having problems scoring.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 18:42:12
Roman Bednar can always help out Cox, if he's having problems scoring.

what, goals or coke?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 19:24:53
I wonder if one of the high street bookies will give odds on a double; Cox to be Championship top scorer next season then Premier League top scorer the following season. Got to be about 500/1 plus, more likely 1000/1.
There's a reason for that


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 19:39:34
what, goals or coke?

 Charlie or weed, Roman don't care...got to have something to spend your vast weekly wage on.


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: yeo on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 21:48:54
Has he actualy officially gone now?


Title: Re: Simon Cox
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 22:19:38
Roman Bednar can always help out Cox, if he's having problems scoring.

Jambos legend!!